eks.

eks. — CS2 Stats

76561199223949203[U:1:1263683475]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,537Tracked matches83%Win rate2022Tracked since
656Hours in CS
CSDB Rating7.9 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating25,381Top 10% of 201,197 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#17347 of 248007 tracked
FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 20 Sep 2026 (13 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,381 -1,702 8 May – 20 Sept · 24 days played
24,99929,220peak 29,2208 May20 Sept
29,509Peak Premier in tracked matches
33Days played since 2026-05-08

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,839 below peak (29,220)
  • -2,103 over 30 days · declining
  • -1,793 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 4,619 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-15
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-15

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches27——
Win rate78%——
K/D2.46——
Headshot %76%——

Measured 4 Sep 2026 → 3 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=29,304), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 10 median
Headshot rate42.4%50.9%
Shot accuracy9.6%13.8%
Kill/death ratio1.291.09
Match win rate56.9%48.4%

Share this profile

CSDB.GGeks.FACEITLevel 10STANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER25,381 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim100
Positioning61
Utility33

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT65–34–1Last 10065%Win rateWLWWWWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −27.9pp headshot accuracy · +97ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.09
  • Avg headshot accuracy 45%
  • Avg reaction 444ms

Last 10

  • 9–1 · 90% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.08
  • Avg headshot accuracy 44%
  • Avg reaction 384ms

Last 20

  • 18–2 · 90% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.10
  • Avg headshot accuracy 58%
  • Avg reaction 336ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim10.0
Utility3.3
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels5.8

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 100 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

T openings. 63% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 39 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim10.0
Positioning6.1
Utility3.3
Mechanics7.9
Opening Duels6.6
Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.9/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.07+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg 0.07
Reaction time438ms−100ms
first ⅓ avg 538ms → last ⅓ avg 438ms
Headshot accuracy48.0%+24.7%
first ⅓ avg 23.3% → last ⅓ avg 48.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.27Best match rating · 4–13 · dust2, 12 Sept →
100%Best headshot accuracy · 13–0 · ancient, 12 Sept →
164msFastest reaction time · 13–1 · dust2, 12 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 12 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

11Longest win streak
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 79% over 24infernoWeakest map · 43% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2S3222–1069%0.06
mirageS2419–579%0.05
ancientA106–460%0.00
nukeA95–456%0.05
cacheB84–450%0.02
infernoC73–443%-0.02
anubis—22–0100%0.03
office—22–0100%0.01
train—20–20%0.01
vertigo—10–10%-0.07
overpass—11–0100%0.06
poseidon—10–10%-0.05
sanctum—11–0100%0.21

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

36,580Lifetime kills
1.29K/D · Top 25% of Level 10 players
1,669Matches
56.9%Match win rate · Top 10% of Level 10 players
42.4%Headshot %
9.6%Shot accuracy
4,891MVPs
656Hours (in match)
1,234Bombs planted
464Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

4,867dust2
2,925inferno
1,236nuke
917vertigo
399train
99office
62cbble
35lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

52.7%Headshot accuracy
61.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.2%Spray accuracy
85.3%Counter-strafing
6.9°Preaim
396msReaction time
63.2%T opening success
49.4%CT opening success
0.40Enemies flashed / flash
5.7%Flash assists
13.31HE damage / grenade
1.73Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4018 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–80.0430%20 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0724%20 Sept →
mirage13–80.2076%20 Sept →
nuke13–100.0736%19 Sept →
mirage13–40.2261%19 Sept →
inferno13–40.0750%19 Sept →
ancient13–20.0639%19 Sept →
mirage12–30.1052%19 Sept →
nuke13–70.1547%19 Sept →
anubis13–5-0.0126%19 Sept →
dust24–130.2788%12 Sept →
dust213–00.0950%12 Sept →
dust213–20.2256%12 Sept →
ancient13–00.10100%12 Sept →
dust213–40.0675%12 Sept →
dust213–10.1586%12 Sept →
mirage13–20.0163%12 Sept →
anubis13–20.0779%12 Sept →
dust29–10.0644%12 Sept →
nuke13–00.1080%11 Sept →
dust213–60.1779%11 Sept →
mirage13–40.1071%11 Sept →
cache5–13-0.1228%9 Sept →
cache6–10.0227%3 Sept →
mirage3–0-0.120%3 Sept →
dust28–10.0223%3 Sept →
mirage13–1-0.0215%3 Sept →
mirage2–13-0.0533%3 Sept →
cache6–130.1243%26 Aug →
cache13–60.0942%26 Aug →
dust29–130.0229%26 Aug →
ancient3–13-0.0313%19 Aug →
ancient13–10.0120%19 Aug →
nuke13–10.0219%19 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0638%19 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.0129%12 Aug →
mirage13–00.0739%12 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0233%12 Aug →
vertigo4–9-0.0724%12 Aug →
mirage13–90.1225%8 Aug →
mirage13–90.0424%5 Aug →
dust216–130.0119%5 Aug →
ancient13–20.0016%3 Aug →
dust27–130.0928%3 Aug →
mirage3–130.0642%3 Aug →
dust20–13-0.03100%3 Aug →
ancient4–13-0.0438%3 Aug →
mirage13–00.0936%29 Jul →
inferno3–13-0.0413%29 Jul →
nuke7–13-0.0219%29 Jul →
mirage13–7-0.0719%29 Jul →
dust213–4-0.0331%29 Jul →
dust213–80.0327%22 Jul →
nuke13–80.0916%22 Jul →
dust213–50.0532%17 Jul →
mirage13–00.0235%17 Jul →
dust213–110.0114%16 Jul →
cache13–90.0314%15 Jul →
office13–30.0860%8 Jul →
office13–7-0.0628%8 Jul →
cache13–50.0523%7 Jul →
cache2–11-0.0422%7 Jul →
train6–130.0218%7 Jul →
mirage15–150.0732%2 Jul →
inferno3–9-0.0738%1 Jul →
inferno0–9-0.210%1 Jul →
ancient13–50.0013%1 Jul →
mirage13–10.0715%1 Jul →
dust213–60.0217%24 Jun →
dust213–20.1023%24 Jun →
dust213–90.0517%24 Jun →
ancient0–8-0.0910%24 Jun →
overpass9–30.0614%17 Jun →
inferno9–20.1950%17 Jun →
poseidon5–9-0.0533%17 Jun →
inferno9–7-0.0433%17 Jun →
train7–13-0.0032%17 Jun →
dust211–130.0415%17 Jun →
dust28–130.0625%10 Jun →
nuke7–130.0926%10 Jun →
dust213–10-0.0214%10 Jun →
mirage6–13-0.0419%10 Jun →
nuke2–13-0.0335%10 Jun →
mirage13–60.1132%7 Jun →
dust29–130.0216%6 Jun →
inferno10–13-0.0217%6 Jun →
dust213–10.0814%28 May →
mirage7–00.1429%28 May →
sanctum9–20.2117%27 May →
dust213–30.1227%23 May →
dust213–30.0634%23 May →
ancient13–20.0323%22 May →
nuke6–130.0033%22 May →
mirage13–90.029%16 May →
mirage2–5-0.0210%16 May →
cache11–130.0424%16 May →
mirage13–50.1032%15 May →
dust213–90.1022%8 May →
dust213–30.1930%8 May →
dust213–90.0520%8 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches11-Win StreakAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.