FkN | Mj2.WasteOfSpace

FkN | Mj2.WasteOfSpace — CS2 Stats

US76561199219060510[U:1:1258794782]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

13,826Tracked matches55%Win rate2022Tracked since
11,926Hours in CS79Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.9 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating4,820Grey band · top ~79.6% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSilver III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+977Premier CS Rating · 3,843 → 4,820
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 14 days played since 29 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 4,820 -462 29 Aug20 Sept · 16 days played
3,0596,963peak 6,96329 Aug20 Sept
6,963Peak Premier in tracked matches
14Days played since 2026-08-29

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,143 below peak (6,963)
  • Next: Light Blue band at 5,000 180 to go
  • Reached: Light Blue band
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 2 among CSDB-tracked players (n=5,399), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 2 medianLevel 3 medianvs Level 3
Headshot rate46.7%41.3%41.9%above
Shot accuracy10.2%12.6%12.2%2.0% short
Kill/death ratio0.940.950.980.04 short
Match win rate39.5%42.5%43.3%3.8% short

This profile matches the typical Level 3 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 3 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGFkN | Mj2.WasteOfSpaceFACEITLevel 2STANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedPREMIER4,820 · Grey bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim57
Positioning65
Utility2

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT46495Last 10046%Win rateWWLWWWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +50pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +1.7pp headshot accuracy · +41ms reaction

Win rate up 50pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 731ms

Last 10

  • 73 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 745ms

Last 20

  • 9101 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 724ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+3.8 against its own average).

Aim5.7
Utility0.2
Positioning6.5
Opening Duels4.3
Clutch0.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 69% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 69% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 69% on T to 49% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 712ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.7
Positioning6.5
Utility0.2
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels7.3
Win Impact6.7

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time714ms+58ms
first ⅓ avg 656ms → last ⅓ avg 714ms
Headshot accuracy22.8%+0.3%
first ⅓ avg 22.5% → last ⅓ avg 22.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–4 · dust2, 8 Sept
61%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · mirage, 11 Sept
516msFastest reaction time · 13–3 · nuke, 20 Sept
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 15 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W2Current streak
65In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 67% over 6ancientWeakest map · 27% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B40211953%0.01
nukeC1881044%0.00
mirageD134931%-0.04
ancientD113827%-0.00
anubisA74357%0.03
cacheS64267%0.01
infernoC52340%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

282,067Lifetime kills
0.94K/D
18,085Matches
39.5%Match win rate
46.7%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 2 players
10.2%Shot accuracy
30,304MVPs
7,493Hours (in match)
8,578Bombs planted
2,277Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AWP78,192
AK-4741,862
Glock-1822,004
SSG 0821,825
Galil AR12,328
MAC-105,851
FAMAS3,848

Lifetime map wins

51,024dust2
24,276nuke
10,106inferno
7,163vertigo
2,317train
1,055office
335italy
261lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

17Matches
18%Win rate
0.47Avg K/D
84.0ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
1Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Vertigo10%0.7915.0
Dust21100%1.1317.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.2%Headshot accuracy
33.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.1%Spray accuracy
81.4%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
712msReaction time
69.4%T opening success
49.0%CT opening success
0.12Enemies flashed / flash
2.3%Flash assists
0.04HE damage / grenade
0.27Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Settings

    Slow first shots are as often a setup problem as a reflex one — framerate, sensitivity and crosshair visibility all move this number.

    Reaction time 712.281ms — above the 700ms mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.1225 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage10–30.0014%20 Sept
dust213–9-0.0120%20 Sept
dust211–130.1023%20 Sept
nuke13–30.0928%20 Sept
nuke13–7-0.0535%20 Sept
dust216–120.0629%20 Sept
cache13–30.0020%20 Sept
dust213–80.0619%20 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0422%19 Sept
anubis4–13-0.0619%19 Sept
nuke6–13-0.0318%19 Sept
dust213–50.0012%19 Sept
mirage15–15-0.0825%18 Sept
dust29–130.0121%18 Sept
dust213–70.0120%18 Sept
ancient6–130.0629%18 Sept
ancient10–13-0.0517%17 Sept
dust29–13-0.0320%17 Sept
dust27–130.0216%17 Sept
dust26–13-0.0532%17 Sept
ancient13–90.0226%17 Sept
ancient4–13-0.0820%17 Sept
ancient13–60.0014%17 Sept
nuke13–110.0019%17 Sept
anubis13–90.1213%17 Sept
nuke13–10-0.0138%17 Sept
nuke13–90.0418%16 Sept
dust26–13-0.0126%16 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0619%16 Sept
dust213–20.0329%16 Sept
cache7–13-0.0331%16 Sept
dust22–13-0.0921%16 Sept
mirage13–11-0.0241%15 Sept
anubis13–10.0217%15 Sept
dust23–13-0.0821%14 Sept
dust27–130.0421%14 Sept
nuke14–16-0.0415%14 Sept
ancient13–9-0.0033%14 Sept
dust211–13-0.0812%14 Sept
dust213–30.0625%14 Sept
mirage4–13-0.0516%13 Sept
dust213–90.0421%13 Sept
dust215–150.0526%13 Sept
anubis8–130.0727%13 Sept
ancient9–13-0.0418%13 Sept
nuke13–40.0124%13 Sept
anubis13–9-0.0222%13 Sept
dust213–80.0318%13 Sept
cache13–80.0031%13 Sept
mirage13–10.0331%13 Sept
dust21–13-0.0228%13 Sept
mirage13–40.0316%12 Sept
nuke7–130.0726%12 Sept
dust215–150.0318%12 Sept
dust213–90.0422%12 Sept
nuke8–13-0.0429%12 Sept
dust213–10.0221%12 Sept
dust21–13-0.0717%12 Sept
dust213–100.0131%12 Sept
cache13–30.0745%11 Sept
mirage3–13-0.0929%11 Sept
dust216–140.0221%11 Sept
dust212–12-0.0433%11 Sept
mirage5–13-0.0520%11 Sept
mirage4–130.0161%11 Sept
dust213–7-0.0234%11 Sept
nuke13–110.0029%11 Sept
dust213–11-0.0127%11 Sept
mirage3–13-0.0919%11 Sept
anubis13–70.0015%11 Sept
inferno13–60.0422%10 Sept
nuke15–15-0.0714%10 Sept
dust213–4-0.028%10 Sept
cache13–20.0910%10 Sept
dust211–130.0128%10 Sept
dust213–80.0325%10 Sept
inferno11–130.0315%10 Sept
nuke9–130.0319%10 Sept
nuke13–9-0.0219%9 Sept
dust27–13-0.0029%9 Sept
nuke7–13-0.0230%9 Sept
nuke8–130.0122%9 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0915%9 Sept
anubis10–130.0640%9 Sept
nuke7–13-0.0017%8 Sept
ancient7–130.0732%8 Sept
dust22–13-0.0622%8 Sept
inferno5–130.0125%8 Sept
dust213–40.1333%8 Sept
dust213–10-0.0124%8 Sept
cache6–13-0.0535%8 Sept
nuke9–130.0229%8 Sept
dust213–80.0919%8 Sept
inferno7–130.017%8 Sept
ancient6–130.0021%8 Sept
dust210–13-0.0422%7 Sept
dust213–11-0.0327%7 Sept
ancient7–130.0333%7 Sept
inferno13–60.0613%7 Sept
ancient7–13-0.0424%7 Sept

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →