Krest

Krest — CS2 Stats

76561199218440767[U:1:1258175039]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

387Tracked matches56%Win rate2023Tracked since
818Hours in CS45Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,109 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 2 Sep 2026 (58 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,109 → 1,109
+74Tracked matches · now 387
−20.3ppWin rate · 75.9% → 55.6%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,512 +1,010 12 Apr – 2 Sept · 4 days played
13,40014,512peak 14,51212 Apr2 Sept
14,512Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,109Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
35Days played since 2026-03-19

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,109
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 — 92 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,525), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate62.3%46.8%48.2%above
Shot accuracy0.8%13.0%13.2%12.4% short
Kill/death ratio0.681.061.070.39 short
Match win rate42.9%46.3%46.9%4.0% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGKrestFACEITLevel 8 · 1,109 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPEAK ELO1,109csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim91
Positioning62
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT71–24–5Last 10071%Win rateTWWWWWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +50pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating · −6.4pp headshot accuracy · +2ms reaction

Win rate up 50pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–0–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.08
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 505ms

Last 10

  • 7–2–1 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 519ms

Last 20

  • 9–9–2 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 518ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim9.1
Utility4.8
Positioning6.2
Opening Duels2.9
Clutch3.8

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 91 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Counter-strafing. 91% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.1
Positioning6.2
Utility4.8
Mechanics9.0
Opening Duels3.1
Win Impact6.9

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time556ms−60ms
first ⅓ avg 616ms → last ⅓ avg 556ms
Headshot accuracy17.7%−2.8%
first ⅓ avg 20.5% → last ⅓ avg 17.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.25Best match rating · 13–0 · anubis, 21 Oct →
46%Best headshot accuracy · 6–13 · italy, 15 Sept →
438msFastest reaction time · 16–13 · anubis, 18 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · anubis, 21 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

12Longest win streak
3–3In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 100% over 6dust2Weakest map · 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA1912–763%0.03
anubisS1510–567%0.05
dust2D124–833%0.03
infernoS1110–191%0.06
nukeS108–280%0.03
officeS64–267%-0.00
vertigoS66–0100%0.05
overpassS54–180%0.01
ancientS54–180%0.04
italy—43–175%-0.00
cache—21–150%0.01
stronghold—22–0100%0.14
train—11–0100%-0.02
alpine—11–0100%0.08
warden—11–0100%0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

26,598Lifetime kills
0.68K/D
890Matches
42.9%Match win rate
62.3%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 8 players
0.8%Shot accuracy
1,677MVPs
1,670Hours (in match)
683Bombs planted
157Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,180dust2
975nuke
725inferno
280vertigo
76office
62train
46italy
2cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

221Matches
55%Win rate
1.24Avg K/D
82.3ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
34%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage7149%1.2216.4
Nuke3063%1.5917.2
Anubis2948%1.1717.4
Dust22767%1.3219.8
Inferno2756%1.0916.2
Ancient2157%1.0716.7
Overpass978%1.1516.0
Cache425%0.8915.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.9%Headshot accuracy
40.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
45.4%Spray accuracy
90.5%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
536msReaction time
42.3%T opening success
42.7%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
8.6%Flash assists
6.36HE damage / grenade
7.20Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust215–150.0221%24 Oct →
inferno13–30.0816%24 Oct →
mirage13–60.0213%24 Oct →
anubis13–00.2518%21 Oct →
dust213–30.0512%19 Oct →
anubis16–13-0.0216%18 Oct →
mirage7–130.0213%18 Oct →
mirage13–70.0417%18 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.018%18 Oct →
mirage11–130.0413%27 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0118%21 Sept →
anubis10–130.0425%16 Sept →
office12–12-0.0514%15 Sept →
italy6–13-0.0346%15 Sept →
anubis9–130.0018%14 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0212%12 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0218%12 Sept →
anubis19–150.0615%8 Aug →
nuke13–5-0.0320%13 May →
mirage9–13-0.0025%13 May →
cache7–13-0.0428%9 May →
nuke4–00.070%9 May →
cache13–10.057%9 May →
inferno13–90.0722%18 Apr →
overpass7–130.0432%18 Apr →
inferno13–70.0422%18 Apr →
overpass13–20.0110%18 Apr →
mirage6–130.0423%18 Apr →
nuke12–120.0923%18 Apr →
mirage13–60.0624%17 Apr →
mirage13–10-0.084%16 Apr →
mirage13–70.0410%14 Apr →
dust213–80.0922%12 Apr →
mirage16–13-0.0117%12 Apr →
anubis6–130.0014%12 Apr →
italy13–10-0.0628%10 Apr →
overpass13–9-0.0414%10 Apr →
office13–10-0.0112%10 Apr →
nuke9–13-0.0416%10 Apr →
vertigo13–70.0820%10 Apr →
vertigo13–7-0.0021%10 Apr →
vertigo13–60.0124%10 Apr →
vertigo13–60.0418%10 Apr →
mirage13–60.0318%9 Apr →
mirage13–50.0526%6 Apr →
dust29–130.0017%6 Apr →
office13–50.0518%6 Apr →
mirage11–130.0319%4 Apr →
anubis13–100.0515%4 Apr →
nuke13–90.045%4 Apr →
anubis13–100.0319%3 Apr →
anubis3–13-0.0417%3 Apr →
office8–130.0234%2 Apr →
anubis13–110.0313%2 Apr →
dust213–50.1123%30 Mar →
ancient13–60.0816%30 Mar →
stronghold13–20.2233%30 Mar →
overpass13–90.0530%30 Mar →
nuke13–90.0220%30 Mar →
inferno13–00.1317%28 Mar →
ancient13–70.068%27 Mar →
dust211–130.1418%27 Mar →
inferno13–70.0417%27 Mar →
dust213–90.0922%26 Mar →
dust25–13-0.0233%26 Mar →
dust212–120.0021%26 Mar →
inferno13–90.1413%26 Mar →
ancient8–130.0320%25 Mar →
mirage13–10.0526%25 Mar →
anubis13–110.0621%24 Mar →
mirage13–80.0323%23 Mar →
mirage13–50.1218%23 Mar →
train13–7-0.0217%23 Mar →
alpine13–50.0822%23 Mar →
italy13–40.1124%23 Mar →
office13–10-0.0327%23 Mar →
ancient13–30.0210%23 Mar →
overpass13–70.019%23 Mar →
warden13–50.1015%23 Mar →
vertigo13–70.0923%23 Mar →
dust27–13-0.0235%23 Mar →
inferno13–10-0.0040%23 Mar →
nuke13–80.0729%22 Mar →
anubis13–40.1720%22 Mar →
mirage0–4-0.010%22 Mar →
office13–5-0.0114%21 Mar →
italy13–2-0.0228%21 Mar →
dust212–12-0.0537%21 Mar →
nuke13–6-0.0133%21 Mar →
anubis13–90.0524%21 Mar →
stronghold13–50.0612%21 Mar →
inferno13–80.0521%21 Mar →
inferno13–50.137%21 Mar →
vertigo13–80.0617%21 Mar →
nuke13–50.0313%21 Mar →
inferno1–8-0.0017%21 Mar →
ancient13–30.0220%20 Mar →
anubis13–40.1022%20 Mar →
nuke13–20.1112%20 Mar →
mirage13–90.0520%19 Mar →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches12-Win StreakAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.