Drayky 2.0

Drayky 2.0 — CS2 Stats

FR76561199212019925[U:1:1251754197]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

864Tracked matches60%Win rate2024Tracked since
927Hours in CS31Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating11,894Blue band · top ~44.9% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 2 Nov 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 11,894 +3,316 31 Aug – 2 Nov · 44 days played
8,57813,075peak 13,07531 Aug2 Nov
Faceit ELO: 812 +0 31 Aug – 25 Sept · 4 observations
812812peak 81231 Aug25 Sept
13,384Peak Premier in tracked matches
812Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
42Days played since 2026-08-31

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,181 below peak (13,075)
  • -639 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 3,106 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-21
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=10,505), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate53.9%41.8%42.7%above
Shot accuracy0.4%12.2%11.2%10.9% short
Kill/death ratio0.860.980.990.13 short
Match win rate47.2%43.3%43.9%above

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDrayky 2.0FACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER11,894 · Blue bandPEAK ELO812csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim76
Positioning63
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT53–44–3Last 10053%Win rateWWWWWWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.07 avg rating · −1.2pp headshot accuracy · −41ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 5–0 · 100% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 550ms

Last 10

  • 8–2 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 519ms

Last 20

  • 14–6 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 539ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim7.6
Utility5.5
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels4.5
Clutch2.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 66% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 66% on T to 44% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6
Positioning6.3
Utility5.5
Mechanics6.5
Opening Duels6.3
Win Impact8.3

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time535ms−30ms
first ⅓ avg 565ms → last ⅓ avg 535ms
Headshot accuracy24.0%+3.5%
first ⅓ avg 20.5% → last ⅓ avg 24.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–4 · inferno, 29 Oct →
45%Best headshot accuracy · 9–1 · inferno, 1 Nov →
367msFastest reaction time · 13–4 · inferno, 29 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 2 Nov →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W6Current streak
6–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 64% over 22anubisWeakest map · 29% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2515–1060%-0.01
dust2A2214–864%0.01
infernoB2110–1148%-0.01
anubisD144–1029%-0.02
ancientA74–357%-0.01
cacheC52–340%-0.01
nuke—42–250%-0.02
vertigo—22–0100%0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

16,319Lifetime kills
0.86K/D
1,190Matches
47.2%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 3 players
53.9%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 3 players
0.4%Shot accuracy
2,342MVPs
842Hours (in match)
987Bombs planted
177Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,369inferno
2,189dust2
835nuke
639vertigo
77train
62office
40lake
27italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

77Matches
44%Win rate
0.97Avg K/D
70.8ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust22540%0.9312.8
Mirage2442%1.0613.6
Inferno1560%0.9312.1
Ancient714%1.0315.7
Nuke560%0.9112.0
Overpass1100%0.7911.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.6%Headshot accuracy
32.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.5%Spray accuracy
79.4%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
533msReaction time
66.2%T opening success
44.5%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
10.0%Flash assists
8.14HE damage / grenade
9.25Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–10.0318%2 Nov →
dust213–50.0723%2 Nov →
mirage13–100.0031%2 Nov →
vertigo13–70.1522%1 Nov →
inferno9–7-0.0216%1 Nov →
inferno9–10.0845%1 Nov →
mirage9–13-0.0738%1 Nov →
inferno6–13-0.0213%31 Oct →
anubis13–70.0326%31 Oct →
inferno13–40.1725%29 Oct →
mirage13–4-0.0229%29 Oct →
vertigo13–70.0238%29 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.0411%29 Oct →
inferno13–6-0.0526%28 Oct →
dust213–3-0.0528%28 Oct →
dust216–140.0323%28 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0433%28 Oct →
mirage13–7-0.0234%28 Oct →
inferno7–13-0.0330%27 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0117%26 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0021%26 Oct →
anubis13–11-0.0024%25 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0314%25 Oct →
mirage13–30.0532%23 Oct →
dust213–60.1027%23 Oct →
dust213–70.0530%23 Oct →
anubis9–13-0.0415%23 Oct →
mirage13–6-0.0612%23 Oct →
inferno3–13-0.0916%23 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.126%23 Oct →
cache10–130.1127%23 Oct →
anubis5–130.1019%22 Oct →
anubis9–13-0.0624%22 Oct →
ancient13–3-0.036%22 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0115%22 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0825%22 Oct →
nuke8–30.0136%22 Oct →
nuke10–13-0.0226%19 Oct →
inferno8–130.0321%19 Oct →
ancient13–30.0520%18 Oct →
cache3–13-0.1314%17 Oct →
mirage13–20.0914%16 Oct →
mirage13–110.0715%16 Oct →
inferno7–13-0.0514%16 Oct →
ancient16–130.0320%15 Oct →
ancient1–13-0.0910%15 Oct →
ancient13–5-0.0110%15 Oct →
dust29–130.0624%15 Oct →
dust213–7-0.0611%15 Oct →
dust213–90.0713%15 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0631%15 Oct →
mirage13–6-0.0116%14 Oct →
mirage13–30.1222%14 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.056%13 Oct →
inferno13–90.0416%12 Oct →
anubis6–130.0122%12 Oct →
anubis13–80.0121%11 Oct →
mirage13–20.0616%10 Oct →
mirage15–15-0.0113%9 Oct →
cache4–13-0.0921%7 Oct →
dust213–70.0127%7 Oct →
inferno8–130.0110%6 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0614%5 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0034%5 Oct →
mirage2–13-0.1611%4 Oct →
inferno3–13-0.0826%1 Oct →
inferno13–9-0.1014%1 Oct →
nuke13–10-0.0313%30 Sept →
mirage3–130.0032%30 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0118%29 Sept →
anubis15–15-0.0815%28 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0414%26 Sept →
anubis13–50.054%26 Sept →
cache13–100.0121%26 Sept →
dust213–50.0625%25 Sept →
dust213–20.0224%25 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0926%25 Sept →
inferno13–40.0231%24 Sept →
mirage13–50.0318%24 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0113%24 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0118%22 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0322%22 Sept →
dust213–90.0220%21 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.0224%20 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0624%20 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0224%19 Sept →
cache13–40.0619%19 Sept →
dust215–15-0.0022%19 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0123%18 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.0330%17 Sept →
mirage13–5-0.0032%17 Sept →
dust216–120.0117%17 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0214%15 Sept →
mirage8–130.0320%15 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0017%14 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0415%13 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0421%13 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0919%10 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0126%10 Sept →
dust211–130.0016%10 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.