koky 2.0

koky 2.0 — CS2 Stats

CZ76561199203562325[U:1:1243296597]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

707Tracked matches45%Win rate2023Tracked since
647Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.9 DevelopingPositional Player
FaceitLevel 4 · 1,019 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 8 Sep 2026 (67 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,019 → 1,019
+27Tracked matches · now 707
+10.3ppWin rate · 34.5% → 44.8%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 4,548 -6,662 20 Mar – 2 Jul · 28 days played
4,54811,488peak 11,48820 Mar2 Jul
11,528Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,019Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
47Days played since 2026-03-20

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,019
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 — 32 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-08
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-09-08

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,630), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate49.9%42.7%43.8%above
Shot accuracy3.6%11.2%12.0%8.5% short
Kill/death ratio0.960.991.020.06 short
Match win rate47.7%43.9%44.7%above

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGkoky 2.0FACEITLevel 4 · 1,019 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPEAK ELO1,019csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71
Positioning47
Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY39–57–4Last 10039%Win rateLWLLWWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −4.2pp headshot accuracy · +8ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 581ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 598ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 595ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+0.8 against its own average).

Aim7.1
Utility4.5
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels2.8
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 609ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1
Positioning4.7
Utility4.5
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels3.4
Win Impact3.3

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time608ms−35ms
first ⅓ avg 643ms → last ⅓ avg 608ms
Headshot accuracy24.1%+2.6%
first ⅓ avg 21.5% → last ⅓ avg 24.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–2 · dust2, 23 Apr →
67%Best headshot accuracy · 7–13 · mirage, 26 Apr →
328msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · mirage, 26 Apr →
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 11 Apr →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
5–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 75% over 8mirageWeakest map · 35% over 37
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC3713–2435%-0.00
dust2C187–1139%0.01
nukeC145–936%0.03
anubisB105–550%0.00
infernoC83–538%0.01
ancientS86–275%0.02
poseidon—30–30%-0.05
cache—20–20%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (35% over 37). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

24,303Lifetime kills
0.96K/D
1,518Matches
47.7%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 4 players
49.9%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 4 players
3.6%Shot accuracy
3,386MVPs
647Hours (in match)
1,845Bombs planted
439Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,152dust2
1,627inferno
1,292nuke
345train
268vertigo
17cbble
15office
12lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

314Matches
49%Win rate
1.00Avg K/D
73.2ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage12654%1.0615.3
Dust25740%0.8913.2
Ancient4048%1.1115.2
Anubis2756%0.9614.0
Nuke2339%0.9614.7
Inferno2143%0.7712.5
Cache650%1.0116.0
Overpass540%1.0716.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.1%Headshot accuracy
31.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.6%Spray accuracy
81.6%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
609msReaction time
39.5%T opening success
48.0%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
9.9%Flash assists
10.09HE damage / grenade
5.64Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.4966% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

35% win rate across 37 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage11–13-0.0413%10 Nov →
mirage13–40.0824%9 Nov →
inferno8–13-0.0822%4 Nov →
dust213–16-0.0119%3 Nov →
mirage13–10-0.0318%2 Nov →
inferno13–70.0726%2 Nov →
dust28–130.0519%2 Nov →
inferno10–13-0.0417%2 Nov →
dust28–13-0.0126%2 Nov →
dust213–30.0730%2 Nov →
dust213–80.0832%31 Oct →
dust25–130.0423%31 Oct →
dust213–90.0232%30 Oct →
mirage13–70.0126%28 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0230%20 Oct →
anubis13–8-0.0517%30 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0633%11 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0415%2 Jul →
anubis9–13-0.0423%28 Jun →
anubis13–6-0.0026%22 Jun →
inferno7–9-0.0621%6 Jun →
nuke8–8-0.0624%6 Jun →
mirage9–130.0016%19 May →
mirage10–130.0316%14 May →
cache3–13-0.0217%29 Apr →
cache3–13-0.0321%28 Apr →
mirage13–70.0322%28 Apr →
mirage13–80.0126%28 Apr →
nuke13–40.0515%28 Apr →
mirage7–13-0.1067%26 Apr →
mirage13–50.0322%26 Apr →
mirage12–120.1325%23 Apr →
mirage1–13-0.0135%23 Apr →
dust213–20.1522%23 Apr →
mirage12–16-0.0224%22 Apr →
nuke9–130.0321%21 Apr →
dust28–13-0.0617%20 Apr →
poseidon2–9-0.076%19 Apr →
dust24–12-0.070%13 Apr →
mirage11–130.0019%12 Apr →
nuke6–130.0621%11 Apr →
mirage13–10.0318%11 Apr →
inferno9–4-0.0133%11 Apr →
mirage7–120.0441%9 Apr →
dust25–80.0225%8 Apr →
mirage13–20.010%8 Apr →
mirage11–13-0.0212%6 Apr →
inferno13–60.1031%6 Apr →
dust213–10-0.0230%6 Apr →
anubis7–13-0.0213%6 Apr →
poseidon4–9-0.1511%4 Apr →
dust213–11-0.0317%3 Apr →
nuke13–8-0.0132%2 Apr →
mirage10–130.0213%2 Apr →
nuke13–110.1121%2 Apr →
mirage10–130.0120%2 Apr →
inferno8–80.1130%2 Apr →
mirage3–130.0425%1 Apr →
mirage1–13-0.0824%1 Apr →
ancient13–90.0911%31 Mar →
mirage10–130.0418%31 Mar →
anubis13–80.0122%31 Mar →
nuke9–130.0728%30 Mar →
anubis9–130.0530%30 Mar →
ancient13–80.0419%30 Mar →
nuke13–50.0318%30 Mar →
mirage13–90.0522%30 Mar →
mirage13–11-0.0423%30 Mar →
dust216–140.0138%29 Mar →
mirage7–13-0.0615%29 Mar →
dust23–13-0.0720%29 Mar →
inferno9–130.0224%29 Mar →
dust23–13-0.0447%29 Mar →
mirage3–13-0.0126%29 Mar →
anubis11–130.0718%28 Mar →
mirage7–13-0.0726%28 Mar →
dust26–130.1029%28 Mar →
mirage9–13-0.0514%28 Mar →
ancient13–100.0116%27 Mar →
mirage9–13-0.0342%27 Mar →
poseidon6–90.078%27 Mar →
nuke11–130.0110%27 Mar →
anubis13–80.0217%27 Mar →
mirage13–8-0.0426%27 Mar →
mirage13–50.0332%27 Mar →
ancient13–4-0.0120%27 Mar →
mirage4–13-0.0224%26 Mar →
nuke14–160.1417%25 Mar →
mirage13–10.0815%24 Mar →
ancient13–100.0013%24 Mar →
nuke15–15-0.0026%23 Mar →
ancient12–160.0011%23 Mar →
ancient3–130.0514%23 Mar →
mirage6–130.0315%22 Mar →
nuke11–130.0215%22 Mar →
nuke13–11-0.0329%21 Mar →
ancient13–6-0.0213%21 Mar →
anubis6–13-0.0227%21 Mar →
mirage3–13-0.0329%20 Mar →
anubis13–90.0015%20 Mar →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.