Tettiläinen kirkas.kives

Tettiläinen kirkas.kives — CS2 Stats

FI76561199198948472[U:1:1238682744]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,861Tracked matches47%Win rate2022Tracked since
4,064Hours in CS62Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating19,999Top 50% of 204,150 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~8.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#81748 of 251272 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 1,858 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 7 Oct 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,999 -1,266 7 Aug – 7 Oct · 21 days played
19,87822,716peak 22,7167 Aug7 Oct
23,753Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,858Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
42Days played since 2026-08-05

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,858
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 143 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-03
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-03

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,717 below peak (22,716)
  • -1 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 1 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-03
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=29,304), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 10 median
Headshot rate46.5%50.9%
Shot accuracy4.4%13.7%
Kill/death ratio0.971.09
Match win rate45.5%48.4%

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTettiläinen kirkas.kivesFACEITLevel 10 · 1,858 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER19,999 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,858csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82
Positioning53
Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47–49–4Last 10047%Win rateWLWLWWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +10.5pp headshot accuracy · −82ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 546ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 492ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 533ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim8.2
Utility5.1
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels1.1
Clutch4.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 566ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2
Positioning5.3
Utility5.1
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact3.9

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time571ms−37ms
first ⅓ avg 608ms → last ⅓ avg 571ms
Headshot accuracy20.3%+4.2%
first ⅓ avg 16.1% → last ⅓ avg 20.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 12–12 · nuke, 15 Sept →
100%Best headshot accuracy · 1–13 · ancient, 1 Oct →
438msFastest reaction time · 16–12 · mirage, 5 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 7 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
5–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 61% over 18infernoWeakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA1810–856%0.01
nukeA1811–761%0.02
mirageB178–947%0.03
anubisB147–750%-0.00
cacheC135–838%0.01
infernoD92–722%-0.01
dust2B84–450%-0.02
vertigo—20–20%0.02
train—10–10%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

115,516Lifetime kills
0.97K/D
5,647Matches
45.5%Match win rate
46.5%Headshot %
4.4%Shot accuracy
16,107MVPs
2,519Hours (in match)
4,983Bombs planted
3,520Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4745,616
AWP11,230
MP92,534
MAC-102,109
FAMAS1,899

Lifetime map wins

10,899nuke
7,397inferno
6,736vertigo
4,696dust2
1,732train
258cbble
166lake
54office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,274Matches
53%Win rate
1.10Avg K/D
79.1ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage28546%1.0415.5
Anubis22355%1.1517.1
Ancient19658%1.1316.3
Nuke16459%1.1916.6
Dust213646%0.9914.6
Inferno11158%1.0816.1
Vertigo7363%1.3718.6
Cache1127%0.8812.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.1%Headshot accuracy
35.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.5%Spray accuracy
82.1%Counter-strafing
8.7°Preaim
566msReaction time
43.3%T opening success
35.9%CT opening success
0.45Enemies flashed / flash
4.9%Flash assists
12.61HE damage / grenade
9.64Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4507 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 35.8931% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–90.0616%7 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0422%7 Oct →
ancient28–250.0117%6 Oct →
nuke12–16-0.0615%5 Oct →
nuke13–60.0121%4 Oct →
nuke13–70.0015%4 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0229%1 Oct →
ancient1–13-0.03100%1 Oct →
inferno13–9-0.0014%30 Sept →
mirage13–90.0416%29 Sept →
ancient13–80.0112%29 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0215%29 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0313%27 Sept →
anubis13–80.0417%27 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0424%27 Sept →
mirage13–16-0.0111%26 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0316%26 Sept →
anubis13–1-0.0715%25 Sept →
mirage13–160.0315%25 Sept →
cache5–13-0.0223%24 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0715%24 Sept →
ancient13–90.0413%24 Sept →
cache13–60.0120%23 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0527%22 Sept →
inferno1–13-0.0624%22 Sept →
dust21–13-0.0424%22 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0720%21 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0310%21 Sept →
nuke13–3-0.0727%17 Sept →
ancient13–60.0117%15 Sept →
nuke12–120.1922%15 Sept →
nuke2–7-0.0113%14 Sept →
ancient13–30.0015%9 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0116%8 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0414%8 Sept →
ancient14–160.027%7 Sept →
mirage13–00.1715%7 Sept →
mirage16–120.0513%5 Sept →
dust22–13-0.0526%4 Sept →
cache8–130.0520%4 Sept →
nuke13–110.0420%1 Sept →
dust213–110.0118%30 Aug →
nuke8–130.0119%29 Aug →
anubis0–13-0.039%25 Aug →
inferno3–130.0412%25 Aug →
ancient13–60.0227%25 Aug →
dust213–20.0811%25 Aug →
cache13–50.0234%25 Aug →
vertigo12–120.0318%24 Aug →
cache8–130.1328%24 Aug →
nuke0–13-0.0512%24 Aug →
anubis19–16-0.0119%24 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.056%24 Aug →
ancient4–13-0.0212%24 Aug →
mirage9–130.0624%24 Aug →
nuke13–70.1117%24 Aug →
anubis11–130.0112%23 Aug →
nuke13–30.0618%22 Aug →
cache11–130.0524%22 Aug →
vertigo12–120.0123%21 Aug →
nuke13–80.0246%21 Aug →
train6–110.0431%21 Aug →
mirage13–40.0516%21 Aug →
inferno8–130.0417%20 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.0227%20 Aug →
cache8–130.0218%20 Aug →
ancient6–130.0617%20 Aug →
anubis13–100.0217%20 Aug →
nuke13–110.0213%19 Aug →
mirage8–130.0017%19 Aug →
cache13–7-0.0414%19 Aug →
nuke3–13-0.0117%19 Aug →
cache4–13-0.0713%18 Aug →
dust25–13-0.1333%18 Aug →
inferno6–130.0123%17 Aug →
ancient8–130.0412%17 Aug →
anubis13–40.0817%17 Aug →
mirage13–60.0621%17 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.0313%16 Aug →
cache1–13-0.0719%16 Aug →
anubis13–3-0.0214%16 Aug →
dust213–70.0530%15 Aug →
nuke13–30.0213%15 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0216%15 Aug →
anubis11–130.0112%15 Aug →
anubis14–160.0118%14 Aug →
cache13–20.0748%14 Aug →
dust213–8-0.0419%14 Aug →
ancient13–90.0414%14 Aug →
ancient14–160.029%14 Aug →
anubis13–60.0115%14 Aug →
ancient16–140.0714%9 Aug →
nuke13–80.0414%9 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0111%8 Aug →
ancient13–100.0216%7 Aug →
nuke13–60.0412%7 Aug →
ancient12–12-0.037%6 Aug →
mirage11–00.090%6 Aug →
inferno13–70.0111%5 Aug →
cache13–30.099%5 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.