LeviisBetter

LeviisBetter — CS2 Stats

76561199171509101[U:1:1211243373]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

630Tracked matches50%Win rate2023Tracked since
663Hours in CS45Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.8 StrongOpening Duellist
Premier CS Rating19,319Top 50% of 205,416 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~11.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#92461 of 252583 tracked
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Oct 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,319 +244 31 Aug – 14 Oct · 20 days played
17,91019,622peak 19,62231 Aug14 Oct
19,623Peak Premier in tracked matches
29Days played since 2026-08-31

Premier CS Rating

  • 303 below peak (19,622)
  • +215 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 681 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,220), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate71.7%45.7%46.8%above
Shot accuracy0.8%12.7%13.0%12.2% short
Kill/death ratio2.271.051.06above
Match win rate38.7%45.7%46.3%7.6% short

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLeviisBetterFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER19,319 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim92
Positioning86
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–44–4Last 10052%Win rateWLWWWLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −3.2pp headshot accuracy · −1ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.12
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 527ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.09
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 523ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.10
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 523ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Opening Duellist — Winning opening duels is what stands out in this profile (+2.7 against its own average). How often you WIN the first duel — CSDB cannot yet see how often you take it.

Aim9.2
Utility5.2
Positioning8.6
Opening Duels10.0
Clutch5.4

Sharp aimerStrong positioning

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 75% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: higher opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 92 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 63% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

T openings. 89% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 89% on T to 63% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.2
Positioning8.6
Utility5.2
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels9.2
Win Impact5.0

Composite 7.8/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.10+0.06
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.10
Reaction time520ms−14ms
first ⅓ avg 534ms → last ⅓ avg 520ms
Headshot accuracy20.2%+2.6%
first ⅓ avg 17.6% → last ⅓ avg 20.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.29Best match rating · 13–11 · nuke, 10 Oct →
32%Best headshot accuracy · 9–13 · ancient, 28 Sept →
398msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · ancient, 6 Sept →
13–2Biggest win · mirage, 13 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
6–2In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 71% over 14anubisWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeC198–1142%0.09
dust2A1811–761%0.03
infernoB157–847%0.06
mirageS1410–471%0.05
cacheA138–562%0.07
ancientC125–742%0.03
anubisD51–420%0.03
office—10–10%0.02
vertigo—11–0100%0.14
overpass—10–10%-0.03
train—11–0100%0.13

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

44,053Lifetime kills
2.27K/D · Top 1% of Level 7 players
954Matches
38.7%Match win rate
71.7%Headshot % · Top 1% of Level 7 players
0.8%Shot accuracy
2,328MVPs
343Hours (in match)
525Bombs planted
329Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,268nuke
901dust2
724inferno
294train
225office
167vertigo
5italy
4ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

43Matches
58%Win rate
1.43Avg K/D
93.5ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

47%1v1 clutch win
40%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1258%1.3922.2
Dust21060%1.2715.0
Nuke838%1.3920.0
Anubis560%1.6517.8
Inferno450%1.3821.3
Ancient2100%1.3817.0
Cache1100%1.8018.0
Vertigo1100%2.5623.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.0%Headshot accuracy
43.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.9%Spray accuracy
83.7%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
512msReaction time
88.6%T opening success
63.2%CT opening success
0.46Enemies flashed / flash
6.7%Flash assists
8.85HE damage / grenade
8.99Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4597 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–50.1630%17 Oct →
inferno10–130.1526%17 Oct →
inferno13–30.1915%15 Oct →
inferno13–100.0219%15 Oct →
inferno5–00.0711%15 Oct →
mirage2–13-0.0110%15 Oct →
nuke9–130.1716%15 Oct →
mirage4–130.0321%15 Oct →
cache2–130.0723%15 Oct →
office10–130.0213%15 Oct →
cache13–90.1125%15 Oct →
dust24–130.0316%14 Oct →
cache13–90.1222%13 Oct →
mirage13–20.2016%13 Oct →
nuke13–40.0822%13 Oct →
inferno3–130.0215%12 Oct →
mirage7–130.0715%12 Oct →
mirage13–60.1525%10 Oct →
nuke13–50.0732%10 Oct →
nuke13–60.2028%10 Oct →
nuke13–110.2914%10 Oct →
nuke3–130.1926%10 Oct →
inferno13–40.0812%10 Oct →
inferno8–130.0723%10 Oct →
nuke4–130.1622%9 Oct →
anubis8–130.1418%9 Oct →
cache3–130.0822%7 Oct →
vertigo13–90.1420%5 Oct →
ancient13–110.0419%5 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0119%5 Oct →
mirage13–100.0320%5 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0529%5 Oct →
cache13–40.0825%5 Oct →
cache13–8-0.0313%5 Oct →
cache7–130.0424%5 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0223%4 Oct →
ancient15–150.0520%3 Oct →
nuke8–130.0416%3 Oct →
dust216–120.0920%3 Oct →
dust213–100.0725%1 Oct →
inferno7–130.0514%1 Oct →
overpass6–13-0.0312%30 Sept →
train13–50.1319%30 Sept →
inferno11–130.0220%29 Sept →
inferno13–50.1320%29 Sept →
cache13–20.118%29 Sept →
anubis9–130.0218%28 Sept →
mirage13–100.0212%28 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0432%28 Sept →
inferno13–90.0212%28 Sept →
dust213–70.1014%28 Sept →
ancient10–20.0117%28 Sept →
cache5–13-0.0215%28 Sept →
dust213–70.1522%28 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0019%24 Sept →
dust213–4-0.0311%24 Sept →
dust210–130.0220%21 Sept →
mirage13–60.029%21 Sept →
ancient5–130.1117%21 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0520%20 Sept →
ancient13–60.0812%17 Sept →
nuke6–130.0625%16 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0811%16 Sept →
cache13–60.1015%16 Sept →
nuke8–130.0412%15 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0510%14 Sept →
cache5–00.1723%14 Sept →
cache13–30.0920%14 Sept →
mirage13–100.049%13 Sept →
nuke13–100.0213%8 Sept →
ancient15–150.0315%8 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0215%7 Sept →
ancient16–130.0211%7 Sept →
dust213–50.0415%7 Sept →
mirage13–110.0621%7 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.0532%7 Sept →
dust213–110.0622%7 Sept →
mirage13–40.0219%7 Sept →
dust213–110.0525%7 Sept →
inferno8–80.0912%7 Sept →
nuke9–40.1517%7 Sept →
nuke9–130.0522%7 Sept →
anubis7–130.0817%6 Sept →
ancient6–130.0416%6 Sept →
dust21–13-0.1029%6 Sept →
nuke13–50.0832%6 Sept →
ancient2–130.0622%6 Sept →
inferno16–140.1012%5 Sept →
dust213–4-0.0010%4 Sept →
inferno8–130.0226%31 Aug →
ancient13–20.0214%31 Aug →
anubis13–5-0.0413%31 Aug →
nuke13–90.1013%31 Aug →
nuke6–130.0120%31 Aug →
dust29–130.0218%31 Aug →
dust213–2-0.0220%31 Aug →
mirage6–130.039%31 Aug →
mirage13–60.0515%31 Aug →
dust215–15-0.0014%31 Aug →
nuke7–130.0118%31 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.