Pażalstka

Pażalstka — CS2 Stats

76561199161766645[U:1:1201500917]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

439Tracked matches52%Win rate2025Tracked since
1,038Hours in CS15Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.8 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating13,606Blue band · top ~35.8% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 13,606 → 13,606
+1Tracked matches · now 439
−3.4ppWin rate · 55.2% → 51.7%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 45 days played since 26 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 13,606 +1,712 13 Aug19 Sept · 10 days played
11,89413,960peak 13,96013 Aug19 Sept
13,960Peak Premier in tracked matches
45Days played since 2026-05-26

Premier CS Rating

  • 354 below peak (13,960)
  • +1,510 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 1,394 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-29
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=9,169), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate40.8%41.9%42.7%1.9% short
Shot accuracy0.1%12.2%11.3%11.2% short
Kill/death ratio0.580.980.990.42 short
Match win rate33.1%43.3%43.9%10.8% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 4 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPażalstkaFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER13,606 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim65
Positioning43
Utility33

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47476Last 10047%Win rateLLWLLLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +1.7pp headshot accuracy · −9ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 556ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 603ms

Last 20

  • 1010 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 607ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim6.5
Utility3.3
Positioning4.3
Opening Duels2.5
Clutch0.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 98% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 589ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.5
Positioning4.3
Utility3.3
Mechanics5.8
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact5.6

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time594ms−79ms
first ⅓ avg 673ms → last ⅓ avg 594ms
Headshot accuracy18.3%+4.1%
first ⅓ avg 14.2% → last ⅓ avg 18.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–9 · inferno, 29 May
47%Best headshot accuracy · 7–13 · mirage, 8 Jul
414msFastest reaction time · 3–9 · inferno, 1 Jun
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 7 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
44In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 73% over 11mirageWeakest map · 42% over 50
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC50212942%-0.01
dust2B137654%0.02
nukeS118373%-0.01
infernoB115645%-0.05
anubisC73443%-0.02
cache42250%-0.05
ancient31233%-0.03
vertigo1010%-0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (42% over 50). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

26,146Lifetime kills
0.58K/D
1,772Matches
33.1%Match win rate
40.8%Headshot %
0.1%Shot accuracy
2,637MVPs
594Hours (in match)
1,121Bombs planted
215Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,177dust2
1,406nuke
1,223inferno
108train
95vertigo
24office
16ar_shoots
13cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

33Matches
42%Win rate
0.85Avg K/D
67.4ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

23%1v1 clutch win
11%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust2933%0.7211.4
Mirage956%0.9212.7
Anubis757%0.9812.0
Ancient450%1.0816.5
Nuke20%0.409.5
Inferno10%0.7311.0
Cache10%0.507.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.1%Headshot accuracy
33.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.7%Spray accuracy
75.9%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
589msReaction time
41.2%T opening success
40.6%CT opening success
0.33Enemies flashed / flash
5.9%Flash assists
12.05HE damage / grenade
5.96Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3257 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 50 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis10–13-0.0519%19 Sept
mirage5–13-0.0521%17 Sept
anubis13–6-0.0218%17 Sept
mirage1–7-0.130%13 Sept
mirage0–8-0.0411%13 Sept
mirage6–130.0830%13 Sept
mirage13–8-0.0114%12 Sept
dust21–70.0425%12 Sept
cache13–7-0.0226%11 Sept
dust213–20.0927%11 Sept
mirage16–14-0.0219%11 Sept
dust213–110.0318%11 Sept
cache2–13-0.0821%6 Sept
nuke9–13-0.0113%6 Sept
cache13–3-0.097%6 Sept
mirage13–11-0.0723%5 Sept
anubis12–2-0.0217%5 Sept
mirage2–13-0.0324%4 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0120%3 Sept
mirage13–5-0.0012%3 Sept
vertigo1–13-0.0810%1 Sept
dust213–70.0219%1 Sept
mirage13–4-0.0416%1 Sept
inferno9–6-0.0824%31 Aug
anubis13–40.1423%29 Aug
inferno8–130.0826%29 Aug
mirage13–20.1526%29 Aug
mirage12–120.0216%20 Aug
dust25–130.0311%20 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0112%19 Aug
cache9–13-0.0014%17 Aug
nuke13–50.0730%16 Aug
mirage13–40.0113%16 Aug
mirage14–16-0.0713%13 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0015%13 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0113%13 Aug
mirage16–12-0.0210%13 Aug
nuke13–50.0213%12 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0612%12 Aug
mirage3–8-0.0328%12 Aug
nuke16–130.0114%10 Aug
nuke13–1-0.0015%7 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0719%7 Aug
mirage9–130.0417%7 Aug
nuke13–100.0618%7 Aug
dust213–20.1418%7 Aug
anubis4–13-0.064%6 Aug
mirage9–5-0.0316%6 Aug
anubis4–13-0.0621%5 Aug
mirage9–20.1118%5 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0418%5 Aug
ancient13–60.0429%5 Aug
mirage13–6-0.038%5 Aug
inferno9–20.1013%5 Aug
dust26–130.0418%5 Aug
mirage13–100.009%4 Aug
mirage5–130.0316%3 Aug
mirage12–12-0.0110%2 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0223%2 Aug
dust213–80.0112%1 Aug
inferno13–3-0.0326%1 Aug
inferno10–13-0.1020%24 Jul
dust212–12-0.037%12 Jul
dust29–130.0114%12 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0547%8 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0719%8 Jul
mirage9–120.0111%6 Jul
mirage13–80.0510%6 Jul
mirage4–7-0.0517%6 Jul
dust213–9-0.0511%5 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0614%1 Jul
mirage3–13-0.086%1 Jul
mirage13–10.023%1 Jul
ancient2–13-0.0515%29 Jun
mirage7–130.0013%29 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0415%27 Jun
mirage7–13-0.028%27 Jun
dust29–13-0.0825%27 Jun
mirage5–130.0414%27 Jun
mirage9–13-0.029%21 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0214%21 Jun
nuke7–9-0.1721%19 Jun
inferno0–9-0.300%19 Jun
dust213–11-0.0513%14 Jun
mirage13–40.0715%14 Jun
inferno13–4-0.0613%11 Jun
mirage4–13-0.089%6 Jun
mirage6–100.0322%5 Jun
nuke13–5-0.0340%5 Jun
mirage7–130.0314%4 Jun
inferno3–9-0.196%1 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0313%1 Jun
mirage1–9-0.0119%1 Jun
mirage13–2-0.083%1 Jun
mirage13–90.0316%29 May
inferno12–12-0.0221%29 May
inferno13–90.1621%29 May
nuke13–70.0214%29 May
mirage13–50.0916%28 May
inferno8–8-0.1518%26 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →