Napięty Mati

Napięty Mati — CS2 Stats

PL76561199015117199[U:1:1054851471]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

461Tracked matches41%Win rate2022Tracked since
2,073Hours in CS15Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidAll-Rounder
Premier CS Rating13,859Blue band · top ~34.4% of ranked players (population est.)
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 17 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 52 days played since 30 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 13,859 +3,243 13 May17 Sept · 12 days played
10,27113,960peak 13,96013 May17 Sept
14,077Peak Premier in tracked matches
52Days played since 2026-04-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 101 below peak (13,960)
  • +2,172 over 90 days
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 1,141 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Blue band among CSDB-tracked players (n=19,962), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerBlue band medianPurple band medianvs Purple band
Headshot rate44.5%41.9%44.3%meets
Shot accuracy7.9%9.6%11.8%3.9% short
Kill/death ratio0.870.981.030.16 short
Match win rate39.1%43.8%45.2%6.1% short

This profile matches the typical Purple band player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Purple band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNapięty MatiPREMIER13,859 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning52
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD43489Last 10043%Win rateLLWLLWLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +1.0pp headshot accuracy · −94ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.07
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 417ms

Last 10

  • 37 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 470ms

Last 20

  • 7121 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 517ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-RounderNo style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim8.3
Utility5.0
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels5.1
Clutch2.6

Strong T-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 58% on T to 42% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning5.2
Utility5.0
Mechanics6.0
Opening Duels5.1
Win Impact2.1

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time519ms−76ms
first ⅓ avg 595ms → last ⅓ avg 519ms
Headshot accuracy25.1%+1.5%
first ⅓ avg 23.6% → last ⅓ avg 25.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 9–4 · inferno, 29 Aug
57%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · office, 10 Jul
359msFastest reaction time · 9–13 · anubis, 17 Sept
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 10 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L2Current streak
55In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 52% over 52ancientWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB52272552%0.01
infernoC135838%-0.05
nukeD134931%-0.04
cacheD62433%-0.01
anubisC52340%-0.01
ancientD51420%-0.02
dust24040%-0.03
office110100%0.00
vertigo110100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

46,945Lifetime kills
0.87K/D
3,372Matches
39.1%Match win rate
44.5%Headshot % · Top 50% of Blue band
7.9%Shot accuracy
6,928MVPs
1,046Hours (in match)
2,470Bombs planted
671Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4710,151
AWP6,759
MP91,983
SSG 081,297
P2501,024

Lifetime map wins

3,343inferno
2,950nuke
1,609vertigo
1,456dust2
528train
248cbble
145office
104lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

235Matches
51%Win rate
0.93Avg K/D
71.0ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage8456%0.9913.9
Anubis3853%0.9414.3
Ancient3139%0.9813.4
Nuke2544%0.8913.7
Inferno2045%0.7611.4
Dust21839%0.8112.1
Vertigo1471%0.9012.9
Overpass367%0.8913.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

30.0%Headshot accuracy
31.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
29.9%Spray accuracy
77.0%Counter-strafing
6.7°Preaim
536msReaction time
58.3%T opening success
42.5%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
2.9%Flash assists
13.25HE damage / grenade
5.75Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis9–13-0.0128%17 Sept
mirage5–130.0432%17 Sept
inferno9–5-0.1933%16 Sept
inferno3–9-0.0323%16 Sept
nuke1–9-0.1510%16 Sept
mirage13–70.0428%16 Sept
nuke7–90.1222%16 Sept
inferno7–9-0.0125%16 Sept
mirage7–10.0716%16 Sept
inferno0–9-0.270%14 Sept
nuke1–9-0.220%14 Sept
nuke9–5-0.0315%14 Sept
inferno8–8-0.0215%14 Sept
inferno9–50.0520%14 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0422%14 Sept
mirage7–13-0.1043%13 Sept
ancient5–13-0.0235%10 Sept
cache13–4-0.0414%10 Sept
mirage13–8-0.0020%10 Sept
dust27–13-0.0824%8 Sept
nuke8–80.0524%8 Sept
cache2–13-0.0843%6 Sept
nuke9–13-0.0229%6 Sept
cache13–30.1036%6 Sept
mirage13–100.0137%6 Sept
mirage13–110.0635%5 Sept
mirage12–16-0.0510%5 Sept
mirage8–130.0832%3 Sept
mirage13–50.0216%3 Sept
mirage4–13-0.0552%2 Sept
inferno11–130.0226%31 Aug
inferno1–9-0.1238%31 Aug
inferno9–40.1727%29 Aug
mirage13–6-0.1043%29 Aug
mirage13–110.1233%20 Aug
mirage12–120.0328%20 Aug
dust25–13-0.0038%20 Aug
mirage13–100.0953%16 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0528%9 Aug
mirage10–130.0033%9 Aug
inferno9–70.1529%9 Aug
ancient6–130.0530%8 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0324%6 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0127%6 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0124%5 Aug
ancient13–60.0426%5 Aug
mirage13–60.0837%5 Aug
anubis16–140.0325%5 Aug
mirage11–130.0930%4 Aug
mirage13–40.0727%2 Aug
inferno0–9-0.300%27 Jul
inferno10–130.0019%24 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0243%19 Jul
dust212–12-0.0130%12 Jul
nuke9–130.0215%11 Jul
office13–60.0057%10 Jul
mirage13–10.0117%10 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0436%8 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0539%27 Jun
mirage12–12-0.0127%24 Jun
nuke2–9-0.2227%24 Jun
ancient1–7-0.0920%24 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0210%23 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0531%22 Jun
mirage4–13-0.0227%22 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0228%21 Jun
mirage5–130.1235%21 Jun
nuke5–90.0929%19 Jun
mirage13–8-0.0232%18 Jun
nuke13–7-0.0419%18 Jun
mirage13–70.0119%11 Jun
ancient7–13-0.0619%11 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0342%7 Jun
vertigo13–60.0254%7 Jun
mirage6–10-0.0126%5 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0315%4 Jun
mirage13–20.0918%1 Jun
mirage13–100.0212%31 May
mirage13–5-0.0124%28 May
cache12–120.0315%23 May
inferno9–7-0.0820%23 May
dust212–12-0.0322%21 May
nuke13–80.0221%21 May
mirage12–7-0.0525%20 May
mirage13–80.0324%19 May
mirage7–130.0235%19 May
mirage11–13-0.0321%18 May
mirage13–5-0.0113%18 May
mirage13–10-0.0118%18 May
anubis13–70.0131%18 May
mirage6–13-0.0122%18 May
mirage13–8-0.0130%17 May
mirage9–13-0.0229%17 May
mirage12–12-0.0523%14 May
nuke5–13-0.0917%14 May
mirage13–70.1023%13 May
mirage13–30.1518%4 May
mirage6–13-0.0423%3 May
cache6–13-0.0317%3 May
cache12–12-0.0524%30 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →