rambo

rambo — CS2 Stats

JO76561199150837070[U:1:1190571342]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

908Tracked matches53%Win rate2021Tracked since
2,853Hours in CS9Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,663 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 3 Nov 2026 (11 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,663 → 1,663
+9Tracked matches · now 908
+6.7ppWin rate · 46.7% → 53.3%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,558 -2,352 20 Mar – 15 Sept · 28 days played
20,55824,999peak 24,99920 Mar15 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,663 +0 1 Sept – 3 Nov · 7 observations
1,6631,663peak 1,6631 Sept3 Nov
24,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,663Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
50Days played since 2026-03-20

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,663
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 88 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,132), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate49.1%48.2%50.9%1.9% short
Shot accuracy9.6%13.2%13.7%4.1% short
Kill/death ratio1.061.071.090.03 short
Match win rate46.5%46.9%48.4%1.9% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 10 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGramboFACEITLevel 9 · 1,663 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of ranked30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,663csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning56
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT54–42–4Last 10054%Win rateLWWWLWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +4.5pp headshot accuracy · −41ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 514ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 538ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 559ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim8.6
Utility4.8
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels3.3
Clutch4.0

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 583ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning5.6
Utility4.8
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels2.6
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time579ms−43ms
first ⅓ avg 622ms → last ⅓ avg 579ms
Headshot accuracy20.1%−3.6%
first ⅓ avg 23.6% → last ⅓ avg 20.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–11 · nuke, 1 Apr →
36%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · ancient, 4 Apr →
398msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · ancient, 8 Aug →
13–3Biggest win · mirage, 10 Apr →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
11–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 77% over 13infernoWeakest map · 20% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2313–1057%-0.00
ancientB1910–953%0.00
dust2S1511–473%-0.00
nukeS1310–377%0.03
infernoD102–820%-0.03
anubisA74–357%-0.01
cacheD62–433%-0.04
overpassC52–340%-0.01
office—10–10%-0.00
vertigo—10–10%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

68,825Lifetime kills
1.06K/D
4,043Matches
46.5%Match win rate
49.1%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 9 players
9.6%Shot accuracy
11,336MVPs
1,671Hours (in match)
4,340Bombs planted
1,158Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4720,835
AWP9,149
MP91,909
Knife1,638
FAMAS1,371

Lifetime map wins

3,685nuke
3,580dust2
2,698inferno
1,698vertigo
703train
556cbble
290lake
100office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

749Matches
51%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
80.8ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage25055%1.1117.3
Dust214046%1.0315.9
Ancient8746%1.0216.9
Nuke7953%1.0717.6
Anubis6156%1.0515.7
Inferno5254%1.0516.0
Overpass2952%1.1617.1
Cache1547%1.0515.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.3%Headshot accuracy
38.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.9%Spray accuracy
84.3%Counter-strafing
8.3°Preaim
583msReaction time
33.9%T opening success
46.6%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
7.6%Flash assists
8.82HE damage / grenade
6.52Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.8916% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache14–16-0.0425%13 Nov →
anubis13–90.0721%11 Nov →
mirage13–80.0220%5 Nov →
mirage19–170.0625%21 Oct →
mirage6–130.0026%24 Sept →
cache13–7-0.0925%24 Sept →
nuke13–50.0016%15 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0022%13 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0516%11 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.0322%10 Aug →
ancient6–13-0.0214%8 Aug →
inferno6–9-0.179%13 Jul →
ancient13–11-0.0611%1 Jul →
mirage8–13-0.0419%22 Jun →
mirage7–13-0.099%20 Jun →
mirage6–13-0.0224%18 Jun →
anubis13–80.0110%8 Jun →
dust213–8-0.0024%3 Jun →
ancient10–130.0021%3 Jun →
mirage13–70.0632%31 May →
nuke5–130.0224%23 May →
overpass13–110.0023%19 May →
office8–13-0.0011%17 May →
mirage13–70.0526%16 May →
cache7–13-0.0433%13 May →
mirage10–13-0.0718%11 May →
mirage13–10-0.0114%11 May →
cache14–160.0016%10 May →
anubis5–13-0.0420%10 May →
mirage13–50.0425%10 May →
cache13–6-0.0523%9 May →
anubis4–13-0.1023%2 May →
nuke6–13-0.0315%28 Apr →
vertigo10–130.0129%27 Apr →
ancient8–130.0122%27 Apr →
ancient8–13-0.0432%26 Apr →
overpass13–100.0218%25 Apr →
ancient10–13-0.0026%25 Apr →
mirage11–13-0.0327%23 Apr →
nuke13–90.1025%19 Apr →
dust213–70.0123%16 Apr →
overpass5–13-0.0310%10 Apr →
mirage13–70.0120%10 Apr →
mirage13–30.0130%10 Apr →
mirage22–18-0.0021%9 Apr →
anubis13–50.0015%9 Apr →
inferno4–130.0318%8 Apr →
ancient10–13-0.0429%8 Apr →
ancient13–10-0.0029%8 Apr →
ancient13–110.0223%8 Apr →
dust213–50.0325%8 Apr →
mirage13–70.0722%7 Apr →
inferno15–15-0.0121%7 Apr →
ancient15–150.0112%7 Apr →
inferno3–130.0125%7 Apr →
overpass9–13-0.0317%7 Apr →
dust23–13-0.0713%7 Apr →
mirage13–90.0214%7 Apr →
mirage5–100.0132%7 Apr →
nuke13–16-0.0223%6 Apr →
nuke13–7-0.0015%6 Apr →
dust216–12-0.0135%6 Apr →
nuke13–60.0816%6 Apr →
mirage10–13-0.0631%6 Apr →
inferno9–13-0.0221%6 Apr →
ancient11–130.0327%6 Apr →
inferno15–15-0.0414%5 Apr →
dust213–100.0020%5 Apr →
inferno15–15-0.0131%4 Apr →
ancient13–60.1136%4 Apr →
mirage13–7-0.0416%4 Apr →
mirage14–16-0.0227%4 Apr →
nuke13–50.0323%2 Apr →
dust213–10-0.0417%2 Apr →
ancient13–40.0622%1 Apr →
nuke13–110.1525%1 Apr →
inferno11–13-0.0731%31 Mar →
dust29–13-0.0334%31 Mar →
inferno13–11-0.0119%31 Mar →
nuke13–100.0522%31 Mar →
nuke16–130.0131%30 Mar →
dust28–130.0231%30 Mar →
mirage13–9-0.0320%24 Mar →
dust213–100.0629%24 Mar →
anubis11–13-0.0626%23 Mar →
dust27–13-0.0425%23 Mar →
nuke13–60.0520%23 Mar →
ancient13–60.0430%23 Mar →
dust213–3-0.0315%23 Mar →
ancient13–7-0.0236%23 Mar →
ancient10–13-0.064%23 Mar →
dust213–70.0630%23 Mar →
mirage7–130.0525%23 Mar →
ancient16–140.014%23 Mar →
nuke16–140.0123%22 Mar →
ancient13–110.0826%22 Mar →
overpass11–130.0122%22 Mar →
dust213–7-0.0417%22 Mar →
anubis13–110.0629%21 Mar →
dust213–50.0411%20 Mar →

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.