PurpleHaze0712

PurpleHaze0712 — CS2 Stats

76561199150434545[U:1:1190168817]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

845Tracked matches57%Win rate2021Tracked since
1,810Hours in CS161Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating15,858Purple band · top ~25% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 11 Oct 2026 (6 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,858 +83 23 Aug – 11 Oct · 33 days played
14,52217,568peak 17,56823 Aug11 Oct
17,902Peak Premier in tracked matches
33Days played since 2026-08-23

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,710 below peak (17,568)
  • +387 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 4,142 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,312), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate28.5%42.7%43.7%15.2% short
Shot accuracy12.0%11.3%12.0%meets
Kill/death ratio1.130.991.02above
Match win rate40.3%43.9%44.7%4.4% short

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPurpleHaze0712FACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER15,858 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning63
Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT51–43–6Last 10051%Win rateWLWWLWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −0.1pp headshot accuracy · +43ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 10%
  • Avg reaction 570ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 10%
  • Avg reaction 561ms

Last 20

  • 12–7–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 10%
  • Avg reaction 539ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.6 against its own average).

Aim7.4
Utility5.1
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels3.5
Clutch0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 60% on T to 44% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 564ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning6.3
Utility5.1
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels5.4
Win Impact7.4

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time556ms+6ms
first ⅓ avg 549ms → last ⅓ avg 556ms
Headshot accuracy11.1%+1.7%
first ⅓ avg 9.4% → last ⅓ avg 11.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.29Best match rating · 9–1 · inferno, 29 Aug →
23%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · anubis, 31 Aug →
398msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · inferno, 27 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 11 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
10–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 62% over 21anubisWeakest map · 11% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeA2113–862%0.03
dust2B189–950%-0.00
mirageA1710–759%0.01
ancientB179–853%0.01
infernoA116–555%0.05
anubisD91–811%0.01
cacheB63–350%0.04
poseidon—10–10%-0.15

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (11% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

32,657Lifetime kills
1.13K/D · Top 25% of Level 4 players
2,253Matches
40.3%Match win rate
28.5%Headshot %
12.0%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 4 players
2,691MVPs
625Hours (in match)
938Bombs planted
452Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,374nuke
2,227dust2
1,596inferno
518train
396vertigo
48ar_shoots
41lake
33safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

54Matches
43%Win rate
0.89Avg K/D
79.3ADR
31%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage757%0.8211.7
Ancient560%0.9312.4
Anubis425%0.9516.3
Dust2333%0.7212.3
Nuke367%1.8819.3
Vertigo250%1.0214.5
Inferno2100%1.1416.0
Train10%0.628.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

11.2%Headshot accuracy
37.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.3%Spray accuracy
77.7%Counter-strafing
8.2°Preaim
564msReaction time
59.5%T opening success
43.7%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
4.7%Flash assists
7.75HE damage / grenade
9.06Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 11.1845% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

11% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–00.000%11 Oct →
mirage9–130.1113%11 Oct →
ancient13–100.0213%11 Oct →
nuke13–110.0412%10 Oct →
anubis5–130.0114%4 Oct →
nuke13–30.137%4 Oct →
dust213–100.0210%3 Oct →
anubis10–130.0513%3 Oct →
dust213–60.0916%3 Oct →
dust213–10.017%1 Oct →
dust215–15-0.057%1 Oct →
mirage13–110.0615%30 Sept →
nuke13–50.074%27 Sept →
cache13–30.138%27 Sept →
inferno9–00.1810%27 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.078%27 Sept →
inferno9–60.1111%27 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0413%27 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0119%26 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0611%26 Sept →
inferno2–90.0321%26 Sept →
nuke13–110.0116%26 Sept →
ancient13–40.1015%24 Sept →
dust213–80.0322%21 Sept →
dust28–13-0.036%20 Sept →
inferno13–60.059%20 Sept →
dust212–16-0.0013%20 Sept →
nuke15–150.014%20 Sept →
dust213–70.0013%19 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.068%19 Sept →
dust216–14-0.016%19 Sept →
anubis14–16-0.0413%18 Sept →
cache15–150.0510%17 Sept →
nuke11–130.0515%17 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.005%16 Sept →
nuke13–80.025%16 Sept →
anubis10–130.0912%16 Sept →
nuke13–30.0315%16 Sept →
cache6–130.0212%11 Sept →
cache7–130.0313%11 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.016%10 Sept →
dust215–150.046%10 Sept →
cache13–90.0212%8 Sept →
nuke13–8-0.0020%8 Sept →
nuke13–80.0813%7 Sept →
nuke11–130.0121%7 Sept →
dust22–13-0.0718%7 Sept →
dust213–80.1012%6 Sept →
nuke13–110.0312%6 Sept →
dust26–13-0.045%6 Sept →
nuke7–130.0618%5 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.019%5 Sept →
ancient13–90.038%5 Sept →
poseidon2–9-0.1514%5 Sept →
ancient11–130.0111%5 Sept →
mirage13–16-0.0011%5 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0210%5 Sept →
dust210–130.0016%3 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.027%3 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.026%3 Sept →
dust213–110.019%3 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.043%2 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0314%1 Sept →
ancient13–60.1415%1 Sept →
mirage13–3-0.046%1 Sept →
anubis13–80.0423%31 Aug →
ancient13–10-0.016%31 Aug →
mirage13–100.006%31 Aug →
ancient15–15-0.039%30 Aug →
mirage16–12-0.0215%30 Aug →
mirage13–110.056%30 Aug →
mirage13–100.0111%30 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.055%30 Aug →
ancient11–130.0313%29 Aug →
mirage9–130.0315%29 Aug →
inferno9–10.2910%29 Aug →
ancient13–40.105%29 Aug →
nuke15–15-0.0010%29 Aug →
ancient3–13-0.0414%29 Aug →
nuke13–90.083%29 Aug →
inferno13–50.025%29 Aug →
nuke13–90.0821%29 Aug →
anubis2–13-0.083%28 Aug →
dust213–4-0.075%28 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.0515%28 Aug →
nuke5–13-0.036%28 Aug →
ancient13–9-0.0211%27 Aug →
nuke7–130.0310%26 Aug →
inferno13–7-0.037%25 Aug →
ancient13–60.076%25 Aug →
cache13–110.018%25 Aug →
anubis11–130.018%24 Aug →
dust25–13-0.076%23 Aug →
nuke13–6-0.0013%23 Aug →
mirage16–14-0.0813%23 Aug →
mirage13–90.119%23 Aug →
dust20–5-0.048%23 Aug →
inferno14–160.0713%23 Aug →
mirage13–50.0513%23 Aug →
anubis5–130.0110%23 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.