twizzy

twizzy — CS2 Stats

76561199146521262[U:1:1186255534]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

781Tracked matches54%Win rate2022Tracked since
1,466Hours in CS0Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidPositional Player
CSDB Leaderboard#88548 of 252525 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,610 +8,380 29 May – 22 Mar · 12 days played
10,20719,849peak 19,84929 May22 Mar
19,849Peak Premier in tracked matches
51Days played since 2025-05-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,312), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate46.5%42.7%43.7%above
Shot accuracy9.6%11.3%12.0%2.4% short
Kill/death ratio0.960.991.020.06 short
Match win rate40.9%43.9%44.7%3.8% short

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGtwizzyFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77
Positioning63
Utility44

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT48–43–9Last 10048%Win rateWWWWLWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −7.0pp headshot accuracy · −6ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.03), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 559ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 595ms

Last 20

  • 12–7–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 597ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim7.7
Utility4.4
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels5.1
Clutch1.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 59% on CT to 36% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 573ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7
Positioning6.3
Utility4.4
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels4.3
Win Impact6.2

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.05
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time579ms−121ms
first ⅓ avg 700ms → last ⅓ avg 579ms
Headshot accuracy20.8%+1.0%
first ⅓ avg 19.8% → last ⅓ avg 20.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.24Best match rating · 9–6 · vertigo, 1 Apr →
53%Best headshot accuracy · 3–11 · mirage, 22 Mar →
438msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · mirage, 22 Feb →
13–3Biggest win · ancient, 1 Feb →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
W4Current streak
5–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 82% over 11dust2Weakest map · 25% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC2310–1343%0.01
nukeB179–853%0.02
infernoD155–1033%-0.01
dust2D123–925%-0.00
anubisS119–282%0.03
ancientA106–460%0.05
train—40–40%0.01
vertigo—33–0100%0.11
cache—21–150%-0.02
overpass—22–0100%0.03
dogtown—10–10%-0.11

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

26,229Lifetime kills
0.96K/D
1,781Matches
40.9%Match win rate
46.5%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 4 players
9.6%Shot accuracy
4,611MVPs
1,005Hours (in match)
933Bombs planted
538Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,902inferno
1,818nuke
1,268dust2
880vertigo
307train
95cbble
28lake
18ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

47Matches
40%Win rate
0.88Avg K/D
73.1ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

27%1v1 clutch win
6%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno1050%1.0316.4
Anubis933%0.7612.6
Vertigo714%0.8514.6
Ancient580%0.8413.8
Mirage425%0.608.3
Nuke333%1.3413.7
Overpass250%0.6812.0
Dust21100%1.4413.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.6%Headshot accuracy
36.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.6%Spray accuracy
82.0%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
573msReaction time
35.6%T opening success
59.1%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
9.8%Flash assists
7.47HE damage / grenade
5.03Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.6204% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
vertigo9–6-0.0621%9 Sept →
inferno9–40.098%9 Sept →
nuke9–40.1514%9 Sept →
ancient16–130.029%7 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.1321%7 Sept →
inferno13–60.0111%7 Sept →
anubis16–13-0.0312%7 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0222%7 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0532%6 Sept →
nuke16–130.0516%5 Sept →
cache12–12-0.0217%16 May →
cache13–5-0.0224%9 May →
dust28–130.0117%15 Apr →
vertigo9–60.2422%1 Apr →
anubis5–13-0.0031%31 Mar →
anubis8–13-0.0121%22 Mar →
mirage3–11-0.0253%22 Mar →
ancient13–9-0.0215%17 Mar →
anubis13–100.0817%15 Mar →
ancient13–40.1020%15 Mar →
nuke13–60.0924%15 Mar →
mirage10–130.1528%15 Mar →
anubis13–8-0.0716%9 Mar →
ancient15–150.1526%1 Mar →
nuke11–130.0221%1 Mar →
mirage6–130.0224%23 Feb →
mirage13–40.0930%22 Feb →
inferno13–60.0430%22 Feb →
mirage13–60.0318%22 Feb →
dust23–130.0612%22 Feb →
mirage13–60.0121%22 Feb →
mirage11–130.0018%22 Feb →
anubis13–60.0715%22 Feb →
mirage8–130.0317%15 Feb →
nuke15–150.0328%15 Feb →
anubis13–100.0618%15 Feb →
mirage8–130.0122%10 Feb →
dust28–13-0.0630%8 Feb →
anubis13–110.0421%4 Feb →
mirage11–13-0.0228%1 Feb →
mirage16–120.0221%1 Feb →
ancient13–30.0418%1 Feb →
nuke16–120.0724%1 Feb →
anubis13–40.0628%1 Feb →
ancient14–160.0830%1 Feb →
ancient13–60.0621%24 Jan →
ancient13–40.0618%24 Jan →
nuke13–4-0.0427%27 Nov →
dust213–90.0918%5 Nov →
dust212–120.0915%5 Nov →
inferno10–130.0013%2 Nov →
ancient2–10-0.048%2 Nov →
mirage13–6-0.0122%2 Nov →
dust211–13-0.0515%2 Nov →
dust213–30.0623%2 Nov →
mirage5–13-0.0344%2 Nov →
dust213–16-0.0225%1 Nov →
mirage13–50.1231%1 Nov →
mirage8–130.0719%27 Oct →
vertigo9–30.1624%8 Oct →
dust212–12-0.0315%7 Sept →
inferno16–130.1113%3 Sept →
ancient11–130.0211%3 Sept →
train11–130.0617%3 Sept →
nuke13–80.0527%3 Sept →
overpass13–80.0518%2 Sept →
overpass16–130.0120%1 Sept →
mirage13–90.0118%1 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0125%1 Sept →
mirage13–110.0822%30 Aug →
nuke9–30.0514%29 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.119%29 Aug →
inferno9–3-0.0310%29 Aug →
dust29–13-0.1028%28 Aug →
nuke4–9-0.0825%28 Aug →
inferno1–9-0.0631%25 Aug →
nuke7–90.0410%24 Aug →
inferno6–9-0.078%24 Aug →
mirage13–110.0211%24 Aug →
nuke9–70.0321%23 Aug →
inferno3–9-0.1631%23 Aug →
nuke8–8-0.0827%23 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0524%19 Aug →
inferno6–9-0.0718%19 Aug →
mirage10–1-0.0423%2 Aug →
dust213–11-0.046%2 Aug →
inferno5–9-0.068%2 Aug →
dogtown8–8-0.1111%30 Jul →
anubis13–80.1219%14 Jul →
train5–13-0.0529%28 Jun →
inferno4–130.0128%24 Jun →
train10–130.0325%23 Jun →
mirage8–13-0.0325%20 Jun →
inferno12–120.0426%15 Jun →
train10–13-0.0017%14 Jun →
anubis13–60.0620%14 Jun →
nuke13–80.0225%13 Jun →
inferno12–120.0024%13 Jun →
nuke2–13-0.0714%4 Jun →
nuke10–130.0622%29 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.