Дембовский

Дембовский — CS2 Stats

PL76561199131583183[U:1:1171317455]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

84Tracked matches54%Win rate2021Tracked since
536Hours in CS22Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating15,010Purple band · top ~28.4% of ranked players (population est.)
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,010 +5,977 23 Feb – 13 Oct · 12 days played
8,39515,118peak 15,11823 Feb13 Oct
15,118Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,064Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
42Days played since 2021-03-06

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,064
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 — 137 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2

Premier CS Rating

  • 108 below peak (15,118)
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 4,990 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Purple band among CSDB-tracked players (n=37,767), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPurple band medianPink band medianvs Pink band
Headshot rate41.7%44.3%46.9%5.3% short
Shot accuracy11.0%11.9%13.0%2.0% short
Kill/death ratio1.501.031.08above
Match win rate45.4%45.2%46.7%1.3% short

This profile matches the typical Pink band player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Pink band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGДембовскийPREMIER15,010 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,064csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim59
Positioning64
Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY27–30–5Last 6244%Win rateLWWLWLWTWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −0.8pp headshot accuracy · +20ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.08
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 523ms

Last 10

  • 6–3–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.08
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 516ms

Last 20

  • 12–7–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.07
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 506ms

Newest first, from the last 62 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim5.9
Utility4.6
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels4.5
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Counter-strafing. Only 55% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.9
Positioning6.4
Utility4.6
Mechanics1.1
Opening Duels5.0
Win Impact6.3

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.07+0.08
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.07
Reaction time506ms−100ms
first ⅓ avg 606ms → last ⅓ avg 506ms
Headshot accuracy22.2%+6.1%
first ⅓ avg 16.1% → last ⅓ avg 22.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 62 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.31Best match rating · 13–3 · anubis, 11 Oct →
44%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · anubis, 20 Mar →
398msFastest reaction time · 13–2 · mirage, 24 Jan →
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 12 Oct →

Across the last 62 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 48% over 29anubisWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2914–1548%0.03
nukeC94–544%0.01
anubisD62–433%0.06
dust2D62–433%0.01
vertigo—41–325%-0.03
ancient—21–150%-0.01
cache—21–150%0.02
inferno—21–150%-0.01
overpass—21–150%-0.01

Across the last 62 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

17,993Lifetime kills
1.50K/D · Top 5% of Purple band
747Matches
45.4%Match win rate · Top 50% of Purple band
41.7%Headshot %
11.0%Shot accuracy
1,687MVPs
282Hours (in match)
692Bombs planted
201Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

496nuke
357dust2
342inferno
168vertigo
133train
16office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

105Matches
49%Win rate
1.23Avg K/D
90.5ADR
55%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3560%1.2917.8
Anubis2035%1.1216.6
Ancient1662%1.2515.1
Dust21540%1.1915.5
Nuke1040%1.0916.6
Inferno650%1.5521.5
Train10%1.2421.0
Overpass10%1.4423.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.3%Headshot accuracy
34.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.7%Spray accuracy
55.1%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
548msReaction time
46.5%T opening success
53.3%CT opening success
0.46Enemies flashed / flash
3.5%Flash assists
7.13HE damage / grenade
10.63Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4621 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage10–130.0717%13 Oct →
mirage7–00.2425%12 Oct →
mirage13–10.0918%12 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.0216%12 Oct →
mirage13–10.0417%12 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.0425%11 Oct →
anubis13–30.3117%11 Oct →
cache15–150.0034%10 Oct →
dust213–80.0630%10 Oct →
nuke13–110.0320%10 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0117%10 Oct →
dust210–130.0623%10 Oct →
anubis13–30.0925%10 Oct →
nuke13–50.0731%10 Oct →
mirage13–80.0529%10 Oct →
mirage13–30.1716%10 Oct →
mirage6–130.0613%6 Oct →
dust216–14-0.0118%6 Oct →
nuke8–100.0530%5 Oct →
mirage13–60.0324%2 Oct →
cache13–80.0314%24 Sept →
mirage16–130.0510%5 May →
anubis8–130.0219%26 Jan →
anubis7–13-0.0321%23 Jan →
dust210–13-0.0320%22 Jan →
vertigo6–13-0.0524%20 Jan →
mirage15–15-0.0121%19 Jan →
dust210–13-0.0320%17 Jan →
nuke15–15-0.0013%11 Jan →
mirage12–120.0119%7 Jan →
nuke13–90.1315%6 Jan →
mirage13–90.0926%21 Apr →
mirage7–13-0.0418%17 Apr →
ancient13–4-0.019%22 Mar →
anubis4–13-0.0144%20 Mar →
inferno1–13-0.0018%16 Mar →
mirage5–130.0123%5 Mar →
mirage7–13-0.029%1 Mar →
anubis14–16-0.0510%25 Feb →
mirage10–130.0228%25 Feb →
nuke8–130.0521%25 Feb →
nuke13–6-0.0419%23 Feb →
mirage12–120.0014%13 Feb →
nuke7–13-0.1311%12 Feb →
mirage13–40.0320%12 Feb →
mirage13–60.1016%9 Feb →
vertigo8–13-0.0228%8 Feb →
mirage13–80.1125%7 Feb →
mirage6–13-0.0721%7 Feb →
vertigo13–100.0317%6 Feb →
mirage6–13-0.049%24 Jan →
mirage13–2-0.005%24 Jan →
mirage3–13-0.1114%24 Jan →
mirage1–7-0.0620%24 Jan →
mirage4–90.0421%10 Sept →
overpass2–9-0.0213%30 Apr →
vertigo6–9-0.0618%23 Apr →
mirage9–40.0817%16 Apr →
inferno16–11-0.0317%19 Mar →
mirage1–100.008%24 Jun →
mirage16–40.0015%24 Apr →
overpass16–90.0013%6 Mar →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.