T1arscs

T1arscs — CS2 Stats

76561199117936830[U:1:1157671102]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

335Tracked matches43%Win rate2024Tracked since
283Hours in CS
CSDB Rating7.1 StrongPositional Player
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,878), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate56.0%46.8%48.2%above
Shot accuracy0.0%13.0%13.2%13.2% short
Kill/death ratio0.981.061.070.09 short
Match win rate43.6%46.3%46.9%3.4% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGT1arscsFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning65
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–52Last 10048%Win rateLWLLWLWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −5.5pp headshot accuracy · +4ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 553ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 549ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 547ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim8.7
Utility5.5
Positioning6.5
Opening Duels4.1
Clutch3.2

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

T openings. 64% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 550ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning6.5
Utility5.5
Mechanics8.9
Opening Duels7.0
Win Impact2.8

Composite 7.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time549ms−13ms
first ⅓ avg 563ms → last ⅓ avg 549ms
Headshot accuracy21.2%+0.3%
first ⅓ avg 20.8% → last ⅓ avg 21.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 4–0 · inferno, 4 Sept →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 4–0 · inferno, 4 Sept →
375msFastest reaction time · 1–13 · nuke, 24 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 8 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
11–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 67% over 9nukeWeakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB3215–1747%0.01
anubisB2110–1148%-0.00
dust2B157–847%-0.01
ancientS96–367%0.01
infernoA95–456%0.05
nukeD92–722%0.01
cacheA53–260%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

15,338Lifetime kills
0.98K/D
700Matches
43.6%Match win rate
56.0%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 8 players
0.0%Shot accuracy
1,577MVPs
283Hours (in match)
668Bombs planted
147Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,618dust2
666inferno
455nuke
26vertigo
14train

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

400Matches
51%Win rate
1.12Avg K/D
82.6ADR
54%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage15049%1.1417.2
Anubis6854%1.0414.9
Dust26152%1.1817.9
Inferno3746%1.1617.1
Nuke3256%1.1117.2
Cache2752%1.2419.0
Ancient2544%0.9614.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.2%Headshot accuracy
37.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.7%Spray accuracy
89.9%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
550msReaction time
63.7%T opening success
52.2%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
4.5%Flash assists
6.88HE damage / grenade
15.78Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis8–13-0.0510%14 Nov →
ancient13–110.0027%8 Nov →
anubis9–13-0.0516%7 Nov →
mirage11–13-0.0016%4 Nov →
inferno16–140.1118%29 Oct →
anubis12–16-0.0618%28 Oct →
nuke13–80.0117%27 Oct →
mirage6–130.0117%26 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0130%25 Oct →
anubis13–110.0114%24 Oct →
ancient13–100.0421%24 Oct →
ancient13–9-0.0429%18 Oct →
mirage20–220.0020%18 Oct →
anubis13–90.0324%18 Oct →
cache13–160.0223%15 Oct →
mirage16–13-0.0417%12 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0221%10 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0524%5 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0217%5 Oct →
ancient4–130.0639%4 Oct →
mirage9–130.0119%2 Oct →
anubis10–130.0318%2 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0024%1 Oct →
inferno13–110.0517%30 Sept →
cache13–10-0.0218%29 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0723%28 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0019%28 Sept →
mirage13–30.0122%28 Sept →
mirage7–130.0034%27 Sept →
mirage13–50.0138%27 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0015%27 Sept →
anubis13–20.1021%27 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0614%26 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.0232%26 Sept →
nuke13–16-0.026%25 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.0612%24 Sept →
dust216–13-0.0015%24 Sept →
nuke1–130.0224%24 Sept →
dust213–90.0410%24 Sept →
mirage13–100.0225%22 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0430%22 Sept →
anubis2–13-0.0524%21 Sept →
mirage25–22-0.0319%19 Sept →
anubis13–50.0323%19 Sept →
ancient13–50.0420%18 Sept →
nuke9–130.0222%18 Sept →
mirage11–130.0218%18 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0426%17 Sept →
anubis3–13-0.0130%14 Sept →
mirage10–130.1117%14 Sept →
mirage13–60.0818%14 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0313%13 Sept →
cache19–160.0117%13 Sept →
mirage8–130.0128%13 Sept →
mirage16–140.0541%13 Sept →
nuke0–13-0.0222%12 Sept →
anubis13–8-0.0115%12 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0015%12 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0214%12 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0219%12 Sept →
ancient13–0-0.014%8 Sept →
anubis13–90.0416%8 Sept →
nuke13–90.0622%6 Sept →
inferno13–50.0624%6 Sept →
ancient13–60.0628%6 Sept →
anubis13–110.0024%6 Sept →
mirage11–130.0317%6 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0519%5 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0513%5 Sept →
dust213–40.1127%5 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0716%5 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0223%5 Sept →
dust213–90.1026%5 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0024%5 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0322%4 Sept →
cache5–13-0.0816%4 Sept →
inferno4–00.1650%4 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0323%4 Sept →
mirage13–70.0213%4 Sept →
anubis9–130.0321%4 Sept →
inferno10–130.0511%4 Sept →
dust213–110.0027%4 Sept →
mirage13–100.0113%4 Sept →
anubis13–9-0.0022%31 Aug →
cache13–40.0326%30 Aug →
mirage5–130.0215%29 Aug →
anubis8–13-0.0110%29 Aug →
dust26–13-0.1013%29 Aug →
mirage20–220.0421%29 Aug →
anubis6–13-0.0127%28 Aug →
mirage13–50.0737%28 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0813%28 Aug →
nuke11–130.0220%28 Aug →
mirage13–80.0425%28 Aug →
inferno13–16-0.0415%28 Aug →
mirage7–130.0215%28 Aug →
mirage13–110.0219%27 Aug →
inferno13–20.0817%27 Aug →
dust216–130.0425%27 Aug →
anubis13–90.0226%27 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.