Lusmak

Lusmak — CS2 Stats

FJ76561199117083734[U:1:1156818006]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,102Tracked matches57%Win rate2021Tracked since
2,951Hours in CS39Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.8 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating21,189Top 50% of 180,525 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#60032 of 226866 tracked
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 17 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+45Premier CS Rating · 21,144 → 21,189
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 28 days played since 18 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,189 -724 18 Aug18 Sept · 28 days played
19,03723,929peak 23,92918 Aug18 Sept
23,945Peak Premier in tracked matches
28Days played since 2026-08-18

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,740 below peak (23,929)
  • -1,082 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 3,811 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-15
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-15

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches3810+28
Win rate45%60%−15pp
K/D0.730.88−0.14
Headshot %51%49%+2pp

Measured 9 Sep 202618 Sep 2026; previous 6 Sep 2026 → 9 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=8,862), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate43.4%41.9%42.7%meets
Shot accuracy4.7%12.2%11.2%6.6% short
Kill/death ratio0.700.981.000.30 short
Match win rate42.8%43.3%43.9%1.2% short

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLusmakFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER21,189 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim46
Positioning49
Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43516Last 10043%Win rateWLLWWLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +2.8pp headshot accuracy · −54ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 508ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 581ms

Last 20

  • 128 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 608ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim4.6
Utility6.2
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels1.2
Clutch4.4

Effective flashesLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 67% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.78 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 616ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 65% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.6
Positioning4.9
Utility6.2
Mechanics3.3
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact7.2

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.05
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time609ms+39ms
first ⅓ avg 570ms → last ⅓ avg 609ms
Headshot accuracy17.9%−7.0%
first ⅓ avg 24.9% → last ⅓ avg 17.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 13–5 · inferno, 11 Sept
43%Best headshot accuracy · 13–7 · cache, 6 Sept
375msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · anubis, 27 Aug
13–2Biggest win · anubis, 22 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
48In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 54% over 26mirageWeakest map · 8% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB26141254%-0.00
dust2B23121152%0.00
mirageD131128%-0.01
cacheB137654%0.01
anubisB126650%0.02
ancientD61517%-0.02
nuke41325%-0.08
vertigo21150%0.01
boulder1010%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (8% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

45,626Lifetime kills
0.70K/D
3,579Matches
42.8%Match win rate
43.4%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 3 players
4.7%Shot accuracy
6,020MVPs
1,472Hours (in match)
5,707Bombs planted
659Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4710,829
MAC-105,605
MP94,930
P2501,769
MP71,567
AWP1,486

Lifetime map wins

9,430inferno
6,521dust2
2,514vertigo
2,178nuke
481train
167cbble
161office
47italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

100Matches
50%Win rate
0.69Avg K/D
68.8ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
28%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno2467%0.8112.0
Anubis2167%0.7111.5
Dust21724%0.539.0
Nuke956%0.669.7
Vertigo850%0.5511.0
Mirage729%0.8713.0
Ancient540%0.8011.8
Overpass250%0.639.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.5%Headshot accuracy
31.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.5%Spray accuracy
65.0%Counter-strafing
10.7°Preaim
616msReaction time
45.8%T opening success
33.3%CT opening success
0.78Enemies flashed / flash
6.8%Flash assists
7.57HE damage / grenade
4.44Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 33.3392% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

8% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–6-0.0825%18 Sept
inferno13–16-0.0728%18 Sept
dust210–13-0.0531%18 Sept
inferno13–5-0.0216%18 Sept
dust213–50.0117%18 Sept
dust212–16-0.0714%18 Sept
anubis8–130.0215%17 Sept
inferno13–11-0.0121%17 Sept
dust213–5-0.0217%17 Sept
inferno13–4-0.0516%17 Sept
dust213–10-0.0113%16 Sept
mirage13–5-0.0113%16 Sept
dust213–60.0026%16 Sept
dust26–13-0.1014%16 Sept
dust213–8-0.0524%16 Sept
cache13–60.0014%16 Sept
cache13–6-0.0512%16 Sept
inferno11–13-0.0625%15 Sept
dust25–13-0.0916%15 Sept
ancient3–13-0.0516%15 Sept
nuke8–13-0.105%13 Sept
inferno13–3-0.0215%13 Sept
inferno5–13-0.098%13 Sept
nuke13–11-0.0311%13 Sept
anubis13–80.0829%13 Sept
inferno13–11-0.0320%13 Sept
cache13–3-0.0515%13 Sept
anubis9–130.0214%13 Sept
mirage6–13-0.056%12 Sept
dust27–13-0.0421%12 Sept
mirage11–130.0122%12 Sept
mirage13–160.1323%11 Sept
inferno13–50.2032%11 Sept
cache10–13-0.044%10 Sept
inferno15–15-0.0913%10 Sept
anubis13–16-0.0413%10 Sept
inferno5–13-0.0422%9 Sept
ancient8–13-0.0519%9 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0420%9 Sept
inferno10–130.0121%9 Sept
inferno13–10-0.0621%8 Sept
ancient10–130.0011%8 Sept
inferno13–40.0218%8 Sept
mirage5–13-0.0610%8 Sept
ancient3–13-0.0824%7 Sept
inferno9–13-0.0620%7 Sept
vertigo13–90.0314%7 Sept
dust213–8-0.0517%6 Sept
cache11–130.0315%6 Sept
cache13–70.0543%6 Sept
cache13–70.1023%6 Sept
dust213–40.0436%4 Sept
inferno13–60.1743%3 Sept
vertigo9–13-0.0113%3 Sept
mirage6–13-0.006%3 Sept
dust211–130.0443%2 Sept
dust213–50.0620%2 Sept
inferno15–15-0.078%1 Sept
dust27–13-0.0611%1 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0911%31 Aug
mirage10–130.1031%31 Aug
dust25–13-0.0918%31 Aug
cache5–13-0.0518%30 Aug
mirage14–16-0.077%30 Aug
dust214–160.0740%30 Aug
anubis15–150.0735%30 Aug
anubis13–70.0228%29 Aug
inferno16–120.0837%29 Aug
cache13–90.1125%29 Aug
dust29–13-0.0521%29 Aug
cache7–13-0.0615%29 Aug
cache9–130.0220%29 Aug
dust213–100.0527%29 Aug
nuke4–13-0.1224%29 Aug
dust213–50.1736%27 Aug
boulder7–130.0236%27 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0118%27 Aug
anubis6–130.0227%27 Aug
inferno13–60.1023%27 Aug
dust213–30.0931%27 Aug
cache13–30.1210%27 Aug
cache11–13-0.0524%27 Aug
inferno15–150.0226%27 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0419%27 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0035%26 Aug
inferno13–40.1135%26 Aug
mirage15–150.0130%25 Aug
dust26–130.0637%25 Aug
inferno10–130.0043%24 Aug
dust213–50.0929%24 Aug
anubis16–130.0523%24 Aug
anubis13–50.0828%24 Aug
ancient4–130.0519%22 Aug
anubis4–13-0.083%22 Aug
anubis13–20.0417%22 Aug
inferno13–110.0026%21 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0823%21 Aug
ancient13–80.0225%20 Aug
anubis13–10-0.0613%19 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0019%18 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →