heartjess — CS2 Stats

76561199115669998[U:1:1155404270]

2,848Tracked matches41%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating20,663Pink band · top ~7.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#7116 of 17790 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGheartjessPREMIER20,663 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71
Positioning71
Utility31

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY38584Last 10038%Win rateWLWLWLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.1
Aggression8.9
Utility3.1
Positioning7.1
Opening Duels4.4
Clutch3.8

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 60% on CT to 36% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 633ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1
Positioning7.1
Utility3.1
Mechanics7.9
Opening Duels4.4
Win Impact2.1

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.04 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time632ms−122ms
first ⅓ avg 755ms → last ⅓ avg 632ms
Headshot accuracy23.2%+0.4%
first ⅓ avg 22.8% → last ⅓ avg 23.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.10Best rating — ancient 11–13
131Biggest win — dust2
4Longest win streak
78In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 53% over 19infernoWeakest map · 22% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageD2171433%-0.01
dust2B1910953%-0.01
infernoD1841422%-0.03
cacheB115645%-0.00
anubisB115645%-0.02
ancientC104640%-0.03
nukeD93633%-0.01
overpass1010%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

715Matches
55%Win rate
1.09Avg K/D
78.3ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
24Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage16158%1.0915.7
Ancient6868%1.3516.7
Anubis6645%0.9915.0
Dust26144%0.9714.0
Vertigo2952%0.9915.1
Inferno2763%1.0713.9
Overpass1765%1.2414.3
Nuke1136%0.8913.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.1%Headshot accuracy
33.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.4%Spray accuracy
85.6%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
633msReaction time
35.6%T opening success
59.7%CT opening success
0.47Enemies flashed / flash
5.7%Flash assists
5.63HE damage / grenade
4.01Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4715 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.6143% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–9-0.0026%28 Aug
dust23–13-0.0126%28 Aug
cache13–6-0.0230%28 Aug
inferno2–13-0.0017%27 Aug
nuke13–110.0519%27 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0527%26 Aug
cache9–13-0.0325%25 Aug
dust213–110.0432%25 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0620%15 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0218%15 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0010%15 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0513%15 Aug
inferno13–90.0120%15 Aug
cache5–13-0.0418%12 Aug
anubis16–14-0.069%10 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0122%10 Aug
dust213–100.0132%9 Aug
cache13–11-0.0119%9 Aug
dust28–13-0.0415%6 Aug
nuke15–150.0125%5 Aug
cache13–80.0515%4 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0335%3 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0629%31 Jul
cache8–130.0525%31 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0424%31 Jul
cache8–13-0.0325%31 Jul
dust213–110.0326%31 Jul
ancient13–6-0.0148%30 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0327%29 Jul
dust23–13-0.0421%27 Jul
dust213–70.0235%27 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0217%27 Jul
cache5–13-0.0015%20 Jul
dust213–70.0026%19 Jul
mirage15–15-0.0133%19 Jul
ancient11–130.1027%18 Jul
cache13–90.0918%18 Jul
cache0–13-0.0525%11 Jul
inferno13–60.0118%11 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0433%11 Jul
dust213–10.0421%11 Jul
inferno4–13-0.0418%10 Jul
nuke16–12-0.0219%10 Jul
ancient6–130.0125%6 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0514%28 Jun
anubis13–40.0141%28 Jun
mirage13–110.0123%22 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0222%20 Jun
anubis8–13-0.0723%20 Jun
nuke13–60.0321%20 Jun
anubis13–110.0727%20 Jun
mirage16–130.0428%16 Jun
anubis2–13-0.0413%16 Jun
mirage13–70.0322%15 Jun
ancient13–10-0.0518%15 Jun
inferno9–13-0.0333%12 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0019%10 Jun
dust211–130.0035%10 Jun
inferno8–130.0930%9 Jun
ancient5–13-0.0422%7 Jun
inferno13–3-0.0817%7 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0425%4 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0211%3 Jun
dust211–13-0.0118%3 Jun
nuke5–13-0.0139%3 Jun
dust22–13-0.0332%1 Jun
nuke10–13-0.0414%29 May
cache13–3-0.0213%29 May
mirage13–10-0.0326%28 May
inferno3–13-0.0115%28 May
anubis13–5-0.0822%28 May
dust215–15-0.0320%28 May
mirage13–90.0327%28 May
mirage11–130.0117%26 May
dust213–7-0.0314%26 May
inferno6–13-0.0723%25 May
mirage3–13-0.0335%18 May
nuke5–13-0.0625%18 May
dust216–13-0.0320%15 May
mirage9–13-0.0312%15 May
mirage10–13-0.0123%14 May
dust213–5-0.0638%13 May
ancient13–3-0.0523%13 May
anubis4–13-0.0138%13 May
anubis9–130.0123%12 May
inferno10–13-0.0219%12 May
dust210–13-0.0424%12 May
inferno5–13-0.1133%9 May
mirage6–13-0.069%9 May
inferno8–13-0.0832%9 May
dust213–6-0.0710%8 May
ancient13–6-0.0422%8 May
anubis13–7-0.0318%8 May
dust214–16-0.0020%7 May
overpass4–13-0.0629%7 May
inferno5–13-0.0629%4 May
ancient9–13-0.1213%4 May
mirage4–13-0.0711%4 May
mirage8–130.0342%29 Apr
inferno15–15-0.0127%26 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →