lörvä

lörvä — CS2 Stats

IL76561199114556040[U:1:1154290312]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

865Tracked matches57%Win rate2021Tracked since
1,725Hours in CS19Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,701 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanThe Global Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 66 days played since 17 Feb 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

14,534Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,701Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
66Days played since 2026-02-17

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,701
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 50 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,086), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate45.3%46.8%48.3%2.9% short
Shot accuracy6.4%13.0%13.2%6.8% short
Kill/death ratio0.861.061.070.21 short
Match win rate47.7%46.3%46.9%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGlörväFACEITLevel 8 · 1,701 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPEAK ELO1,701csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning67
Utility35

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT49474Last 10049%Win rateWLLWWWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −7.6pp headshot accuracy · +60ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.09
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 497ms

Last 10

  • 73 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 516ms

Last 20

  • 146 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 486ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim7.9
Utility3.5
Positioning6.7
Opening Duels5.5
Clutch2.4

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning6.7
Utility3.5
Mechanics5.5
Opening Duels5.4
Win Impact7.2

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time499ms−98ms
first ⅓ avg 597ms → last ⅓ avg 499ms
Headshot accuracy25.1%+3.3%
first ⅓ avg 21.8% → last ⅓ avg 25.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.28Best match rating · 9–1 · vertigo, 19 Feb
56%Best headshot accuracy · 6–13 · vertigo, 15 May
297msFastest reaction time · 9–0 · vertigo, 29 Aug
13–0Biggest win · vertigo, 25 Mar

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
106In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 70% over 10infernoWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
vertigoA47291862%0.03
nukeC2181338%0.02
mirageS107370%-0.01
infernoD72529%-0.03
anubis41325%0.02
office41325%-0.03
cache4040%-0.04
dust221150%0.02
overpass1010%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

52,371Lifetime kills
0.86K/D
3,195Matches
47.7%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 8 players
45.3%Headshot %
6.4%Shot accuracy
8,733MVPs
1,950Hours (in match)
2,373Bombs planted
1,616Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4718,102
AWP8,998
Knife1,303
MP91,136
P90616

Lifetime map wins

9,896vertigo
3,735nuke
2,704dust2
2,622inferno
1,382train
403office
301lake
101italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

987Matches
52%Win rate
0.90Avg K/D
73.9ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

32%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage23449%0.9513.7
Anubis10455%0.9514.4
Nuke8160%1.0215.8
Vertigo6761%0.9414.3
Dust24639%0.9112.8
Inferno4443%1.0214.2
Ancient3543%1.0115.6
Train1567%1.1516.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.6%Headshot accuracy
34.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.1%Spray accuracy
74.5%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
507msReaction time
46.6%T opening success
56.5%CT opening success
0.49Enemies flashed / flash
5.8%Flash assists
7.94HE damage / grenade
4.56Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4862 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
vertigo13–50.1924%18 Sept
nuke6–13-0.0323%15 Sept
nuke11–130.0633%15 Sept
anubis13–110.0915%12 Sept
nuke13–90.1226%12 Sept
vertigo13–70.0113%11 Sept
nuke13–60.0518%6 Sept
vertigo13–70.0624%5 Sept
vertigo1–130.0350%5 Sept
vertigo13–7-0.0114%3 Sept
vertigo13–50.0332%3 Sept
vertigo11–130.0328%2 Sept
vertigo13–90.0124%2 Sept
vertigo13–30.1147%2 Sept
vertigo13–80.0345%1 Sept
vertigo13–70.0133%1 Sept
vertigo9–60.0935%1 Sept
inferno7–9-0.0320%31 Aug
vertigo7–90.0330%31 Aug
inferno9–40.0823%29 Aug
vertigo9–00.1921%29 Aug
mirage16–14-0.0217%22 Aug
nuke13–90.0523%22 Aug
vertigo11–130.0343%21 Aug
nuke16–130.0513%18 Aug
nuke7–130.029%10 Aug
vertigo6–13-0.0631%8 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0819%8 Aug
vertigo4–13-0.0650%7 Aug
office13–11-0.0523%25 Jul
cache10–13-0.0612%24 Jul
vertigo13–30.080%23 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0210%21 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0833%18 Jul
nuke2–130.0314%13 Jul
nuke10–130.0521%5 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0121%2 Jul
cache2–13-0.0329%25 Jun
cache6–13-0.0929%25 Jun
mirage13–110.0425%23 Jun
dust213–110.1033%21 Jun
vertigo2–130.0135%21 May
nuke13–40.0739%21 May
mirage12–12-0.0640%20 May
vertigo12–12-0.0340%20 May
vertigo13–70.0536%17 May
vertigo6–130.0456%15 May
vertigo3–13-0.0528%11 May
vertigo13–30.0232%8 May
office4–13-0.0533%6 May
vertigo4–20.0025%6 May
vertigo12–12-0.0711%5 May
anubis7–130.0424%3 May
vertigo13–20.0530%2 May
vertigo13–80.0819%2 May
vertigo10–13-0.0516%30 Apr
cache10–130.0326%29 Apr
vertigo13–7-0.0823%24 Apr
mirage10–13-0.0333%22 Apr
vertigo13–80.1130%20 Apr
vertigo6–13-0.0743%17 Apr
nuke9–13-0.0350%17 Apr
vertigo1–9-0.2640%16 Apr
office6–13-0.0133%9 Apr
vertigo4–9-0.0819%7 Apr
anubis6–13-0.0833%7 Apr
mirage16–140.066%5 Apr
mirage11–13-0.0519%30 Mar
mirage13–10-0.0237%27 Mar
dust29–13-0.0515%27 Mar
mirage16–14-0.0514%26 Mar
nuke10–130.0327%26 Mar
office0–13-0.0320%25 Mar
vertigo13–00.0211%25 Mar
nuke9–13-0.0518%24 Mar
vertigo13–3-0.0013%22 Mar
nuke9–30.1822%19 Mar
nuke6–130.0530%17 Mar
anubis3–130.0314%17 Mar
vertigo4–13-0.0621%12 Mar
inferno8–8-0.037%10 Mar
vertigo3–9-0.0538%10 Mar
nuke9–70.0432%1 Mar
vertigo9–50.0325%1 Mar
vertigo4–9-0.063%28 Feb
vertigo9–20.1315%25 Feb
inferno13–11-0.0134%22 Feb
overpass3–90.0121%22 Feb
inferno6–9-0.1224%22 Feb
vertigo9–50.0320%22 Feb
vertigo9–50.0219%22 Feb
vertigo9–20.2232%21 Feb
vertigo9–40.0614%19 Feb
vertigo9–10.2819%19 Feb
nuke9–60.0231%19 Feb
mirage13–100.0438%18 Feb
inferno9–13-0.0515%17 Feb
mirage13–6-0.0211%17 Feb
inferno9–13-0.0324%17 Feb
vertigo10–10.0839%17 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →