hulken86

hulken86 — CS2 Stats

SE76561199096301976[U:1:1136036248]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,280Tracked matches60%Win rate2025Tracked since
3,517Hours in CS100Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.3 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating12,313Blue band · top ~42.6% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 24 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 27 days played since 27 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 12,313 -2,561 27 Aug – 24 Sept · 22 days played
11,96814,999peak 14,99927 Aug24 Sept
14,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
27Days played since 2026-08-27

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,686 below peak (14,999)
  • -2,561 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 2,687 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches203——
Win rate44%——
K/D0.87——
Headshot %40%——

Measured 30 Aug 2026 → 25 Sep 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=9,819), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate37.0%41.9%42.7%5.7% short
Shot accuracy0.0%12.2%11.3%11.3% short
Kill/death ratio1.000.980.99meets
Match win rate43.6%43.3%43.9%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGhulken86FACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER12,313 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim39
Positioning37
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44–51–5Last 10044%Win rateWLLWWWLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +2.6pp headshot accuracy · +20ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 602ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 602ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 592ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.8 against its own average).

Aim3.9
Utility5.9
Positioning3.7
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch2.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 68% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 39% on T to 22% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 598ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.9
Positioning3.7
Utility5.9
Mechanics5.1
Opening Duels1.2
Win Impact8.3

Composite 4.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time604ms+30ms
first ⅓ avg 574ms → last ⅓ avg 604ms
Headshot accuracy10.6%−1.0%
first ⅓ avg 11.6% → last ⅓ avg 10.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 9–2 · vertigo, 6 Sept →
29%Best headshot accuracy · 10–13 · ancient, 3 Sept →
391msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · inferno, 3 Sept →
13–2Biggest win · inferno, 24 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
8–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 67% over 9infernoWeakest map · 37% over 19
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientB2010–1050%-0.02
infernoC197–1237%-0.02
nukeC187–1139%-0.03
anubisC135–838%-0.01
cacheS96–367%-0.01
mirageC73–443%-0.02
dust2B63–350%-0.05
vertigoA53–260%-0.00
debris—10–10%-0.20
poseidon—10–10%-0.06
office—10–10%-0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (37% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

86,563Lifetime kills
1.00K/D · Top 50% of Level 3 players
5,071Matches
43.6%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 3 players
37.0%Headshot %
0.0%Shot accuracy
10,681MVPs
1,959Hours (in match)
7,312Bombs planted
1,264Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4727,982
AWP4,339
MAC-102,805
MP92,497
MP71,569

Lifetime map wins

10,488inferno
9,017nuke
4,152dust2
2,085train
477vertigo
32ar_shoots
22office
8italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

70Matches
53%Win rate
0.81Avg K/D
69.0ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke1753%0.7712.5
Ancient1675%0.8512.8
Anubis1250%0.7511.6
Dust2944%0.8114.4
Inferno850%1.0614.1
Vertigo450%0.5810.5
Cache30%0.5710.0
Mirage10%1.2117.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

10.7%Headshot accuracy
31.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.7%Spray accuracy
72.8%Counter-strafing
12.1°Preaim
598msReaction time
39.4%T opening success
22.5%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
2.5%Flash assists
8.70HE damage / grenade
11.54Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.0784° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 10.735% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

37% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–90.068%24 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0422%24 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0210%24 Sept →
inferno13–20.0910%24 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0416%24 Sept →
anubis13–2-0.0415%23 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0812%23 Sept →
vertigo14–16-0.0613%23 Sept →
ancient13–5-0.029%23 Sept →
cache10–13-0.0410%23 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0714%23 Sept →
inferno19–15-0.036%22 Sept →
inferno9–130.049%22 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.0810%22 Sept →
vertigo3–13-0.074%21 Sept →
ancient13–7-0.0316%21 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0410%20 Sept →
nuke13–7-0.079%20 Sept →
anubis13–40.0318%20 Sept →
dust27–13-0.063%20 Sept →
cache13–6-0.0410%20 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.085%20 Sept →
ancient13–6-0.0111%19 Sept →
ancient13–4-0.069%19 Sept →
ancient13–4-0.0315%19 Sept →
anubis13–7-0.089%19 Sept →
vertigo13–10-0.068%19 Sept →
ancient13–60.0011%19 Sept →
cache11–13-0.069%19 Sept →
ancient13–5-0.0014%19 Sept →
vertigo13–8-0.016%19 Sept →
dust213–8-0.029%19 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.009%19 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.026%19 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.037%19 Sept →
mirage13–6-0.0113%18 Sept →
ancient12–16-0.0410%17 Sept →
nuke3–13-0.0112%16 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0117%16 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.077%15 Sept →
anubis16–140.0012%15 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0213%14 Sept →
anubis7–130.0210%14 Sept →
cache13–60.023%14 Sept →
nuke13–20.1113%13 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.089%13 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0515%13 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.084%13 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0510%13 Sept →
anubis13–70.0913%13 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.0812%13 Sept →
cache13–6-0.008%13 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0713%13 Sept →
cache3–13-0.0411%13 Sept →
dust28–13-0.064%13 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.059%12 Sept →
inferno13–7-0.0319%12 Sept →
dust213–16-0.0513%12 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0410%12 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0214%12 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.017%12 Sept →
ancient16–120.079%12 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.013%12 Sept →
nuke2–13-0.0911%12 Sept →
ancient15–15-0.0319%11 Sept →
inferno13–6-0.028%10 Sept →
ancient13–100.016%10 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.046%10 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.056%10 Sept →
ancient13–100.0513%10 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.026%9 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0313%9 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0314%8 Sept →
debris3–9-0.2014%7 Sept →
nuke13–50.0517%6 Sept →
inferno8–80.0618%6 Sept →
vertigo9–20.175%6 Sept →
poseidon5–9-0.0611%6 Sept →
inferno2–9-0.1618%6 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.085%5 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0112%5 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0210%5 Sept →
inferno1–13-0.0613%4 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0512%4 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0214%3 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0229%3 Sept →
inferno13–60.0412%3 Sept →
inferno8–80.0210%3 Sept →
ancient15–15-0.0214%2 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0210%2 Sept →
nuke13–90.0711%2 Sept →
cache13–70.0110%2 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0212%1 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0211%1 Sept →
anubis5–130.0417%30 Aug →
nuke11–130.0017%30 Aug →
office2–13-0.090%30 Aug →
nuke0–13-0.100%30 Aug →
mirage13–80.0519%28 Aug →
inferno15–15-0.015%27 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →