盲目  Väsä

盲目 Väsä — CS2 Stats

JP76561199089569455[U:1:1129303727]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

657Tracked matches54%Win rate2021Tracked since
1,060Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.5 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating3,721Grey band · top ~84.2% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 31 Oct 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 3,721 -141 14 Aug – 31 Oct · 21 days played
2,8894,240peak 4,24014 Aug31 Oct
4,280Peak Premier in tracked matches
36Days played since 2026-08-14

Premier CS Rating

  • 519 below peak (4,240)
  • +732 over 30 days · improving
  • -141 over 90 days
  • Next: Light Blue band at 5,000 — 1,279 to go

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=10,505), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate35.5%41.8%42.7%7.3% short
Shot accuracy16.0%12.2%11.2%above
Kill/death ratio0.860.980.990.13 short
Match win rate39.1%43.3%43.9%4.8% short

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG盲目 VäsäFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER3,721 · Grey bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim53
Positioning48
Utility37

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY35–59–6Last 10035%Win rateTLLWLLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · +5.3pp headshot accuracy · +90ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–3–1 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 719ms

Last 10

  • 4–5–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 732ms

Last 20

  • 10–9–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 687ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim5.3
Utility3.7
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels1.8
Clutch2.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 56% on T to 39% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 646ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.3
Positioning4.8
Utility3.7
Mechanics5.5
Opening Duels4.3
Win Impact6.2

Composite 4.5/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time656ms+18ms
first ⅓ avg 638ms → last ⅓ avg 656ms
Headshot accuracy16.0%−0.8%
first ⅓ avg 16.7% → last ⅓ avg 16.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 9–4 · nuke, 20 Aug →
40%Best headshot accuracy · 9–4 · nuke, 20 Aug →
344msFastest reaction time · 2–10 · train, 16 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 14 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
5–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 58% over 12mirageWeakest map · 22% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageD184–1422%-0.02
ancientC156–940%-0.02
officeC146–843%-0.03
nukeA127–558%-0.01
anubisC94–544%-0.00
cacheD62–433%-0.06
dust2C52–340%0.00
vertigo—41–325%-0.07
inferno—41–325%-0.07
train—31–233%-0.05
overpass—30–30%-0.04
eldorado—20–20%-0.09
debris—10–10%-0.08
shelter—10–10%-0.03
italy—11–0100%-0.03
fachwerk—10–10%0.04
boulder—10–10%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 18). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

50,328Lifetime kills
0.86K/D
2,954Matches
39.1%Match win rate
35.5%Headshot %
16.0%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 3 players
7,986MVPs
1,060Hours (in match)
1,806Bombs planted
980Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4712,223
AWP5,752
FAMAS1,744
Knife1,552

Lifetime map wins

3,604nuke
2,211vertigo
2,163inferno
1,410lake
1,245train
1,026dust2
360office
300cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

160Matches
47%Win rate
0.79Avg K/D
71.0ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2857%0.8614.6
Anubis2638%0.8613.7
Nuke2157%0.7112.6
Ancient1861%1.0315.8
Cache1250%0.8512.6
Inferno838%0.629.4
Vertigo743%0.7612.9
Dust2540%0.6811.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.8%Headshot accuracy
33.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.0%Spray accuracy
74.8%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
646msReaction time
56.1%T opening success
38.6%CT opening success
0.39Enemies flashed / flash
3.1%Flash assists
8.10HE damage / grenade
10.77Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3856 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 38.6413% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage15–15-0.0818%31 Oct →
ancient4–13-0.0223%31 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0217%29 Oct →
mirage16–13-0.0511%29 Oct →
vertigo8–13-0.0717%28 Oct →
nuke2–13-0.108%28 Oct →
cache6–13-0.0338%28 Oct →
train13–9-0.0714%27 Oct →
mirage13–50.0028%27 Oct →
dust213–70.1324%27 Oct →
ancient13–20.0423%27 Oct →
ancient16–190.0816%26 Oct →
ancient13–8-0.0113%25 Oct →
vertigo13–9-0.0414%25 Oct →
anubis13–70.063%24 Oct →
cache13–4-0.026%19 Oct →
train6–13-0.0124%19 Oct →
office13–8-0.0213%19 Oct →
office3–13-0.1015%16 Oct →
office4–13-0.0218%16 Oct →
mirage5–130.0416%16 Oct →
anubis8–10-0.110%15 Oct →
ancient13–3-0.0516%15 Oct →
overpass12–120.0216%8 Oct →
mirage12–16-0.0612%8 Oct →
vertigo2–9-0.0720%8 Oct →
inferno6–9-0.1412%8 Oct →
nuke13–6-0.0219%27 Sept →
debris5–9-0.0813%27 Sept →
office11–13-0.1119%27 Sept →
overpass4–9-0.128%26 Sept →
nuke9–5-0.0117%26 Sept →
office13–8-0.0217%23 Sept →
office13–8-0.0320%22 Sept →
office13–8-0.0119%21 Sept →
office9–13-0.048%21 Sept →
eldorado7–9-0.088%21 Sept →
office6–13-0.0921%20 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0126%20 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.079%18 Sept →
cache3–5-0.170%18 Sept →
office13–90.049%18 Sept →
overpass6–9-0.0222%18 Sept →
eldorado4–9-0.1120%18 Sept →
office12–120.0634%18 Sept →
office11–13-0.0020%17 Sept →
shelter11–13-0.038%17 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0515%17 Sept →
anubis13–60.0413%17 Sept →
anubis12–120.1113%17 Sept →
italy13–10-0.0324%16 Sept →
office13–6-0.028%16 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0928%16 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0421%16 Sept →
office3–13-0.0614%16 Sept →
fachwerk3–130.0418%16 Sept →
train2–10-0.0625%16 Sept →
ancient13–110.0811%16 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.084%15 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0617%13 Sept →
dust212–12-0.0729%13 Sept →
dust213–70.025%12 Sept →
inferno13–7-0.0113%12 Sept →
anubis3–13-0.0119%6 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0717%5 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0510%5 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0817%5 Sept →
vertigo4–9-0.096%5 Sept →
boulder12–120.0415%5 Sept →
mirage1–130.003%5 Sept →
mirage10–130.0118%5 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.0814%2 Sept →
nuke11–1-0.0410%28 Aug →
nuke7–13-0.0516%28 Aug →
inferno10–130.0315%28 Aug →
nuke13–20.017%28 Aug →
ancient5–130.0015%27 Aug →
ancient13–100.0112%26 Aug →
mirage9–130.007%26 Aug →
inferno2–9-0.1431%26 Aug →
cache7–13-0.0821%23 Aug →
nuke7–13-0.0313%23 Aug →
mirage13–110.0124%23 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.076%23 Aug →
anubis13–90.0112%23 Aug →
cache8–13-0.0110%23 Aug →
anubis2–13-0.0427%23 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0213%21 Aug →
nuke9–40.1540%20 Aug →
nuke11–90.0119%20 Aug →
nuke13–40.0520%18 Aug →
mirage10–130.0122%16 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0718%16 Aug →
ancient4–13-0.1227%15 Aug →
ancient6–13-0.0118%14 Aug →
anubis13–9-0.0115%14 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.0313%14 Aug →
cache3–13-0.0524%14 Aug →
mirage13–00.0328%14 Aug →
dust212–160.0113%14 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.