oobmab

oobmab — CS2 Stats

JP76561199086806814[U:1:1126541086]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,746Tracked matches57%Win rate2022Tracked since
3,605Hours in CS82Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating22,246Top 50% of 205,052 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#51414 of 252241 tracked
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+722Premier CS Rating · 21,524 → 22,246

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,246 +1,379 30 Aug – 16 Oct · 7 days played
20,86722,246peak 22,24630 Aug16 Oct
22,246Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,085Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
12Days played since 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 22,246
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 2,754 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches224——
Win rate59%——
K/D1.62——
Headshot %62%——

Measured 15 Sep 2026 → 16 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,153), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate64.2%44.8%45.7%above
Shot accuracy1.4%12.4%12.7%11.4% short
Kill/death ratio2.001.031.05above
Match win rate46.9%45.2%45.7%above

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGoobmabFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER22,246 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,085csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning55
Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY60–28–12Last 10060%Win rateLWWWWWTLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −3.6pp headshot accuracy · −24ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 533ms

Last 10

  • 5–4–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 506ms

Last 20

  • 11–7–2 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 518ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim8.1
Utility4.6
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels2.3
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.6° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 55% on T to 37% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning5.5
Utility4.6
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels3.9
Win Impact7.4

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time547ms−19ms
first ⅓ avg 566ms → last ⅓ avg 547ms
Headshot accuracy23.7%+0.6%
first ⅓ avg 23.1% → last ⅓ avg 23.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.22Best match rating · 13–1 · cache, 11 Oct →
40%Best headshot accuracy · 1–13 · inferno, 15 Oct →
305msFastest reaction time · 4–0 · office, 11 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 14 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
4–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 100% over 6nukeWeakest map · 45% over 22
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB2210–1245%0.03
mirageA1911–858%0.01
cacheB137–654%0.03
ancientA116–555%0.04
infernoA106–460%0.01
dust2S66–0100%0.03
anubisS65–183%0.05
vertigoS64–267%0.03
office—43–175%-0.03
train—21–150%-0.01
overpass—11–0100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (45% over 22). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

115,449Lifetime kills
2.00K/D · Top 5% of Level 6 players
3,490Matches
46.9%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 6 players
64.2%Headshot % · Top 5% of Level 6 players
1.4%Shot accuracy
8,532MVPs
1,522Hours (in match)
4,205Bombs planted
1,210Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4763,573
AWP3,691
MP93,134
MAC-101,554
MAG-71,192

Lifetime map wins

7,687nuke
4,098dust2
3,409inferno
2,072vertigo
1,547office
683train
95ar_baggage
50italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

106Matches
56%Win rate
1.15Avg K/D
76.2ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2955%1.1515.2
Ancient1759%1.2918.1
Nuke1669%1.1317.3
Dust21362%0.9415.2
Inferno1136%0.9714.4
Anubis862%1.2216.0
Overpass425%1.1216.5
Cache3100%1.8020.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.3%Headshot accuracy
37.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.5%Spray accuracy
80.7%Counter-strafing
10.6°Preaim
549msReaction time
54.8%T opening success
36.6%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
4.8%Flash assists
8.15HE damage / grenade
7.56Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 36.5897% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

45% win rate across 22 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke10–130.0126%16 Oct →
nuke13–60.1914%16 Oct →
nuke16–130.0523%16 Oct →
dust213–6-0.0423%16 Oct →
cache13–60.0127%15 Oct →
inferno13–3-0.0329%15 Oct →
ancient12–120.0525%15 Oct →
inferno4–130.0428%15 Oct →
office5–13-0.0226%15 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0220%15 Oct →
mirage13–4-0.0233%15 Oct →
nuke11–130.0024%15 Oct →
anubis13–70.0326%15 Oct →
inferno1–13-0.0340%15 Oct →
train1–130.0032%15 Oct →
mirage15–15-0.0321%15 Oct →
cache13–9-0.0434%15 Oct →
nuke13–6-0.0128%14 Oct →
vertigo13–110.0722%14 Oct →
cache3–20.1115%14 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0622%14 Oct →
office13–10-0.0220%14 Oct →
nuke11–130.0618%14 Oct →
inferno13–10.0326%14 Oct →
mirage8–130.0512%13 Oct →
mirage13–70.0716%13 Oct →
mirage1–70.0211%13 Oct →
nuke11–130.1019%13 Oct →
nuke13–90.0314%13 Oct →
mirage13–60.0622%13 Oct →
ancient13–40.1225%13 Oct →
ancient13–40.0727%13 Oct →
cache13–110.0329%12 Oct →
mirage13–80.0121%12 Oct →
ancient13–8-0.0027%12 Oct →
nuke12–12-0.0810%12 Oct →
ancient13–30.1623%12 Oct →
nuke16–120.0119%12 Oct →
ancient5–8-0.0622%11 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0130%11 Oct →
mirage13–80.0513%11 Oct →
inferno13–30.0536%11 Oct →
vertigo13–6-0.0217%11 Oct →
office4–0-0.030%11 Oct →
inferno13–110.0535%11 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0216%11 Oct →
anubis12–12-0.0115%11 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0221%11 Oct →
mirage13–60.0622%11 Oct →
nuke13–100.1229%11 Oct →
nuke12–120.0017%11 Oct →
mirage3–13-0.1113%11 Oct →
cache13–10.2224%11 Oct →
mirage13–30.0213%11 Oct →
cache9–130.0222%11 Oct →
mirage8–130.0319%11 Oct →
cache13–40.0436%11 Oct →
vertigo13–20.0226%10 Oct →
anubis13–90.1124%10 Oct →
anubis7–00.218%10 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0015%10 Oct →
anubis13–8-0.0226%10 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0319%10 Oct →
cache12–12-0.0125%10 Oct →
nuke0–5-0.060%10 Oct →
nuke13–40.0111%10 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.0024%10 Oct →
vertigo5–130.0831%9 Oct →
mirage11–130.0116%9 Oct →
mirage13–1-0.0430%9 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.0430%9 Oct →
ancient13–70.1127%9 Oct →
mirage13–6-0.0519%9 Oct →
nuke12–120.0820%9 Oct →
dust213–60.0825%9 Oct →
mirage13–60.0422%8 Oct →
nuke13–6-0.0234%8 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.0335%8 Oct →
dust213–90.0430%8 Oct →
dust213–9-0.0014%8 Oct →
overpass13–90.0135%8 Oct →
nuke13–70.059%7 Oct →
cache7–130.0228%7 Oct →
nuke12–12-0.0127%7 Oct →
inferno13–100.0222%7 Oct →
nuke13–60.0631%7 Oct →
train10–4-0.0319%7 Oct →
office12–4-0.0429%7 Oct →
anubis13–9-0.0429%6 Oct →
vertigo7–30.0020%6 Oct →
dust213–50.0921%6 Oct →
nuke12–12-0.0326%6 Oct →
cache12–120.1021%6 Oct →
vertigo12–120.0222%5 Oct →
cache10–13-0.058%5 Oct →
nuke12–120.0324%5 Oct →
cache5–13-0.0416%5 Oct →
cache13–60.0411%5 Oct →
ancient13–20.0416%5 Oct →
mirage16–130.0417%5 Oct →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.