pedro

pedro — CS2 Stats

BT76561199086685469[U:1:1126419741]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

690Tracked matches50%Win rate2021Tracked since
1,611Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 10 · 1,959 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 6 Nov 2026 (8 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,959 → 1,959
+2Tracked matches · now 690
0.0ppWin rate · 50.0% → 50.0%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,672 +159 23 Mar – 12 Jan · 9 days played
20,00021,528peak 21,52823 Mar12 Jan
Faceit ELO: 1,959 +0 6 Sept – 6 Nov · 6 observations
1,9591,959peak 1,9596 Sept6 Nov
21,750Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,959Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
61Days played since 2025-03-15

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,959
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 42 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-06
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-06

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches6——
Win rate50%——
K/D1.42——
Headshot %55%——

Measured 6 Nov 2026 → 14 Nov 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=30,986), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 10 median
Headshot rate46.9%50.9%
Shot accuracy3.8%13.7%
Kill/death ratio0.981.09
Match win rate48.0%48.4%

Share this profile

CSDB.GGpedroFACEITLevel 10 · 1,959 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of ranked30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,959csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning49
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51–48–1Last 10051%Win rateWLWWLWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +2.6pp headshot accuracy · +63ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 641ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 644ms

Last 20

  • 13–7 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 613ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim8.1
Utility5.3
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels2.4
Clutch4.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 97% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 45% on CT to 25% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 590ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning4.9
Utility5.3
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time579ms−58ms
first ⅓ avg 637ms → last ⅓ avg 579ms
Headshot accuracy19.8%+2.2%
first ⅓ avg 17.6% → last ⅓ avg 19.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.31Best match rating · 9–0 · inferno, 1 Feb →
56%Best headshot accuracy · 9–0 · dust2, 18 Mar →
359msFastest reaction time · 1–9 · vertigo, 30 Jan →
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 5 Mar →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
5–3In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 77% over 13dust2Weakest map · 40% over 20
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2612–1446%0.00
dust2C208–1240%-0.01
infernoA1710–759%0.00
ancientS1310–377%0.02
vertigoC73–443%-0.02
anubisB63–350%0.03
office—32–167%0.07
nuke—32–167%0.02
overpass—30–30%0.00
train—21–150%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 20). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

46,427Lifetime kills
0.98K/D
2,030Matches
48.0%Match win rate
46.9%Headshot %
3.8%Shot accuracy
5,107MVPs
1,611Hours (in match)
1,397Bombs planted
449Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4719,180
AWP4,742
MP91,068
Knife944

Lifetime map wins

4,494dust2
1,769inferno
874vertigo
754nuke
375train
59office
54cbble
54lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

931Matches
50%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
83.3ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage27354%1.1216.4
Dust222552%1.0516.1
Ancient13850%1.0516.6
Anubis10247%1.0316.4
Inferno9546%0.9715.5
Nuke3644%0.9515.8
Vertigo2050%1.1016.5
Train1765%1.3117.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.0%Headshot accuracy
38.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.0%Spray accuracy
81.2%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
590msReaction time
24.9%T opening success
45.1%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
4.8%Flash assists
9.37HE damage / grenade
7.95Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.9166% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 20 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–100.0019%20 Apr →
dust28–13-0.0326%30 Mar →
ancient16–130.0718%24 Mar →
ancient13–100.0515%23 Mar →
office6–130.0123%18 Mar →
office13–60.0917%18 Mar →
dust213–11-0.0025%18 Mar →
dust29–00.0256%18 Mar →
mirage6–13-0.027%12 Mar →
mirage8–13-0.0521%5 Mar →
dust213–10.0136%5 Mar →
mirage12–16-0.0727%5 Mar →
inferno22–25-0.0513%4 Mar →
dust213–10-0.0512%26 Feb →
ancient13–110.059%25 Feb →
ancient13–70.0323%23 Feb →
inferno13–4-0.0013%23 Feb →
mirage13–100.0018%22 Feb →
mirage13–60.0333%20 Feb →
ancient2–13-0.0717%19 Feb →
mirage11–13-0.018%18 Feb →
mirage13–11-0.057%17 Feb →
anubis13–100.1418%14 Feb →
inferno6–13-0.0517%9 Feb →
dust26–13-0.0315%5 Feb →
inferno10–13-0.0426%4 Feb →
mirage3–13-0.096%4 Feb →
mirage3–13-0.0811%2 Feb →
inferno5–9-0.1029%1 Feb →
inferno9–50.0920%1 Feb →
vertigo9–20.1127%1 Feb →
inferno9–00.3122%1 Feb →
vertigo9–6-0.0119%1 Feb →
inferno9–10.2420%1 Feb →
vertigo6–9-0.0711%1 Feb →
inferno9–4-0.0914%1 Feb →
dust28–130.0119%1 Feb →
mirage5–13-0.0215%1 Feb →
dust216–130.0122%31 Jan →
inferno2–9-0.168%30 Jan →
vertigo1–9-0.190%30 Jan →
vertigo6–90.0220%30 Jan →
inferno13–100.0526%27 Jan →
ancient13–30.1123%27 Jan →
anubis13–10.0213%27 Jan →
mirage13–10.0532%27 Jan →
mirage11–13-0.0011%27 Jan →
nuke7–13-0.0518%27 Jan →
dust23–13-0.0522%27 Jan →
inferno10–00.0420%26 Jan →
dust28–13-0.0425%25 Jan →
mirage13–4-0.0216%25 Jan →
anubis5–13-0.0711%21 Jan →
anubis8–13-0.0011%18 Jan →
ancient13–8-0.069%18 Jan →
anubis13–100.017%17 Jan →
dust210–130.1016%14 Jan →
nuke13–100.0720%12 Jan →
inferno5–130.0143%12 Jan →
mirage13–3-0.0115%10 Jan →
train13–1-0.0229%10 Jan →
mirage10–130.007%9 Jan →
mirage2–13-0.045%9 Jan →
ancient13–9-0.047%9 Jan →
vertigo7–130.0118%7 Jan →
anubis3–130.0622%7 Jan →
mirage6–130.028%6 Jan →
dust219–16-0.0118%6 Jan →
nuke13–70.0423%5 Jan →
ancient13–10-0.0318%5 Jan →
mirage13–60.0120%28 Dec →
dust26–13-0.0719%24 Dec →
mirage9–130.0618%24 Dec →
office13–100.1016%20 Dec →
overpass9–13-0.0415%18 Dec →
dust211–13-0.069%15 Dec →
mirage2–130.0117%15 Dec →
ancient5–13-0.055%15 Dec →
inferno13–8-0.0011%15 Dec →
ancient4–130.1216%15 Dec →
mirage13–20.1514%14 Dec →
inferno9–4-0.0927%13 Dec →
train15–15-0.0111%12 Dec →
mirage7–13-0.0710%12 Dec →
overpass10–130.0427%11 Dec →
dust213–90.0222%2 Dec →
inferno16–14-0.0214%18 Nov →
inferno7–13-0.0521%17 Nov →
dust26–13-0.0123%26 Oct →
mirage13–50.0313%24 Oct →
dust26–130.0324%23 Oct →
ancient13–80.0722%15 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0929%10 Sept →
mirage13–110.0632%16 Apr →
mirage13–90.1623%9 Apr →
dust27–130.0416%25 Mar →
dust213–60.0213%23 Mar →
vertigo13–90.0014%20 Mar →
overpass3–130.029%19 Mar →
ancient13–6-0.0410%15 Mar →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 10500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.