ⓂⓇ.ⒻⓁⒶⒸⒸⒾⒹ

ⓂⓇ.ⒻⓁⒶⒸⒸⒾⒹ — CS2 Stats

76561199084722355[U:1:1124456627]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

6,469Tracked matches41%Win rate2020Tracked since
7,915Hours in CS13Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.2 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating15,076Purple band · top ~28.1% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4 · 785 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (6 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 19 days played since 17 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,076 +1,382 17 Aug – 19 Sept · 10 days played
13,69417,944peak 17,94417 Aug19 Sept
17,944Peak Premier in tracked matches
785Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
19Days played since 2026-08-17

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 785
  • Next: Level 4 at 901 — 116 to go
  • Reached: Level 3 · Level 2

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,868 below peak (17,944)
  • -1,812 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 4,924 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches30——
Win rate40%——
K/D0.91——
Headshot %38%——

Measured 28 Aug 2026 → 25 Sep 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,676), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate39.7%42.7%43.8%4.0% short
Shot accuracy10.1%11.3%12.1%2.0% short
Kill/death ratio0.470.991.020.55 short
Match win rate45.5%43.9%44.7%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGⓂⓇ.ⒻⓁⒶⒸⒸⒾⒹFACEITLevel 4 · 785 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER15,076 · Purple bandPEAK ELO785csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim61
Positioning48
Utility31

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44–51–5Last 10044%Win rateWWWLWLLWWT

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · −0.7pp headshot accuracy · −6ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.04), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 576ms

Last 10

  • 6–3–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 556ms

Last 20

  • 9–10–1 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 559ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim6.1
Utility3.1
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels1.9
Clutch4.2

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 563ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 66% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.1
Positioning4.8
Utility3.1
Mechanics3.5
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact2.1

Composite 4.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time546ms−28ms
first ⅓ avg 574ms → last ⅓ avg 546ms
Headshot accuracy17.0%−0.7%
first ⅓ avg 17.7% → last ⅓ avg 17.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 9–1 · nuke, 24 Aug →
67%Best headshot accuracy · 7–13 · office, 18 Aug →
375msFastest reaction time · 6–9 · nuke, 3 Sept →
13–3Biggest win · nuke, 19 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W3Current streak
8–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 67% over 6mirageWeakest map · 25% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeA1911–858%-0.01
officeB179–853%0.00
mirageD164–1225%-0.01
infernoC94–544%-0.02
dust2C94–544%-0.03
ancientC83–538%-0.04
vertigoC73–443%-0.05
cacheS64–267%-0.02
anubis—31–233%-0.02
eldorado—21–150%0.05
train—20–20%-0.02
overpass—10–10%-0.07
italy—10–10%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

245,483Lifetime kills
0.47K/D
11,037Matches
45.5%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 4 players
39.7%Headshot %
10.1%Shot accuracy
24,794MVPs
3,891Hours (in match)
7,395Bombs planted
1,670Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

MAG-744,328
AK-4740,121
AWP26,877
MP920,936
SSG 0810,245
XM10146,764

Lifetime map wins

26,844office
13,616lake
7,705dust2
6,078nuke
5,278inferno
4,021vertigo
2,506train
1,071italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

449Matches
46%Win rate
0.85Avg K/D
74.4ADR
36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage9849%0.9514.6
Dust26055%0.9214.4
Ancient3546%1.0515.5
Nuke3468%1.0114.9
Anubis2631%0.8413.5
Inferno2568%0.9114.6
Cache2040%0.8914.8
Overpass838%0.8014.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.8%Headshot accuracy
36.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.6%Spray accuracy
66.0%Counter-strafing
11.1°Preaim
563msReaction time
46.0%T opening success
33.0%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
0.7%Flash assists
7.70HE damage / grenade
2.94Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 2.9403 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 32.9571% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
office13–60.0223%23 Sept →
office13–7-0.0227%23 Sept →
vertigo13–11-0.0717%23 Sept →
anubis3–13-0.0419%19 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0713%19 Sept →
cache5–13-0.0221%19 Sept →
office3–13-0.0714%19 Sept →
office13–110.0224%19 Sept →
office13–11-0.0215%19 Sept →
office12–12-0.0223%19 Sept →
office8–00.1022%19 Sept →
office9–13-0.0225%19 Sept →
ancient3–130.0319%19 Sept →
office6–130.0133%17 Sept →
office13–60.0920%17 Sept →
office3–13-0.0326%10 Sept →
office13–110.0221%10 Sept →
office7–130.1012%10 Sept →
vertigo4–13-0.0614%7 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.1011%4 Sept →
ancient2–13-0.0811%4 Sept →
nuke9–130.029%4 Sept →
nuke13–80.0114%4 Sept →
office9–13-0.0317%4 Sept →
office13–11-0.0218%4 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0224%4 Sept →
vertigo6–9-0.155%3 Sept →
eldorado9–20.077%3 Sept →
nuke6–90.038%3 Sept →
inferno6–90.0313%3 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0115%3 Sept →
nuke7–9-0.0515%2 Sept →
nuke16–12-0.0311%30 Aug →
nuke3–9-0.0213%28 Aug →
nuke6–7-0.0610%27 Aug →
vertigo8–80.0213%27 Aug →
mirage13–16-0.0212%27 Aug →
cache13–5-0.0016%27 Aug →
nuke12–120.0616%27 Aug →
mirage11–130.048%27 Aug →
mirage9–130.0219%26 Aug →
inferno13–11-0.0112%26 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.0511%26 Aug →
nuke7–130.0114%25 Aug →
ancient6–13-0.0718%25 Aug →
dust29–130.0313%24 Aug →
cache13–5-0.0713%24 Aug →
nuke13–11-0.0219%24 Aug →
eldorado7–90.0323%24 Aug →
inferno9–40.049%24 Aug →
nuke9–10.113%24 Aug →
office13–6-0.0329%21 Aug →
dust24–13-0.1220%20 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.0114%20 Aug →
nuke13–7-0.0625%19 Aug →
inferno13–10-0.0118%19 Aug →
nuke13–3-0.0517%19 Aug →
inferno13–7-0.0410%19 Aug →
overpass6–13-0.0721%19 Aug →
vertigo13–70.0219%19 Aug →
cache13–10-0.0517%19 Aug →
vertigo6–13-0.1113%19 Aug →
mirage6–130.0122%19 Aug →
ancient13–8-0.049%19 Aug →
mirage16–12-0.077%19 Aug →
nuke13–90.0115%19 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0417%19 Aug →
dust213–90.0131%19 Aug →
mirage13–70.0327%19 Aug →
inferno4–13-0.023%18 Aug →
nuke13–8-0.019%18 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.028%18 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0521%18 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0925%18 Aug →
train9–13-0.0227%18 Aug →
train9–13-0.0313%18 Aug →
mirage15–15-0.0720%18 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.038%18 Aug →
mirage13–7-0.0213%18 Aug →
cache13–30.045%18 Aug →
dust213–10-0.0111%18 Aug →
nuke13–6-0.0511%18 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.0725%18 Aug →
ancient16–12-0.0219%18 Aug →
anubis13–90.019%18 Aug →
mirage13–40.0622%18 Aug →
dust213–9-0.0314%18 Aug →
nuke13–100.0317%18 Aug →
mirage8–130.0813%18 Aug →
ancient13–60.059%18 Aug →
cache2–13-0.0513%18 Aug →
vertigo13–10-0.017%18 Aug →
nuke6–13-0.0114%18 Aug →
italy1–13-0.0028%18 Aug →
office7–13-0.0867%18 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0720%18 Aug →
dust25–130.0022%18 Aug →
mirage12–12-0.0226%18 Aug →
ancient3–13-0.0811%18 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.0116%17 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →