Анальная пробка

Анальная пробка — CS2 Stats

AO76561199083780874[U:1:1123515146]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

458Tracked matches30%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,418Hours in CS11Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating3.9 LearningPositional Player
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,143 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 5 Sep 2026 (13 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,143 → 1,143
+7Tracked matches · now 458
0.0ppWin rate · 30.0% → 30.0%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 45 days played since 28 Jul 2023. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

1,143Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
45Days played since 2023-07-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,143
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 58 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-05
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-05

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,302), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate37.2%45.7%46.8%9.6% short
Shot accuracy17.3%12.7%13.0%above
Kill/death ratio0.831.051.060.23 short
Match win rate44.7%45.7%46.3%1.7% short

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGАнальная пробкаFACEITLevel 7 · 1,143 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPEAK ELO1,143csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning39
Utility36

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD4456Last 10044%Win rateWLLLLLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +0.9pp headshot accuracy · −13ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 548ms

Last 10

  • 28 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 557ms

Last 20

  • 614 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 564ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim6.4
Utility3.6
Positioning3.9
Opening Duels0.9
Clutch3.2

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 39% on CT to 21% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 575ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning3.9
Utility3.6
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels1.2
Win Impact0.0

Composite 3.9/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time577ms+11ms
first ⅓ avg 566ms → last ⅓ avg 577ms
Headshot accuracy14.5%+1.9%
first ⅓ avg 12.5% → last ⅓ avg 14.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 16–9 · inferno, 27 Aug
34%Best headshot accuracy · 13–16 · ancient, 15 Aug
375msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · mirage, 11 Aug
16–2Biggest win · mirage, 11 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
86In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
77Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 56% over 32anubisWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA32181456%-0.00
infernoB25121348%-0.00
vertigoC104640%0.00
nukeD93633%-0.02
dust2D72529%-0.02
anubisD61517%-0.02
ancientD62433%-0.00
overpassC52340%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

36,081Lifetime kills
0.83K/D
1,935Matches
44.7%Match win rate
37.2%Headshot %
17.3%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 7 players
4,746MVPs
794Hours (in match)
961Bombs planted
406Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4710,130
AWP5,224
Knife1,614
MP91,107

Lifetime map wins

4,794inferno
2,084dust2
992vertigo
789nuke
56train
45lake
25office
16assault

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

958Matches
50%Win rate
1.04Avg K/D
74.7ADR
34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage13756%0.9914.5
Dust26047%1.0014.1
Anubis5252%0.9515.0
Ancient3355%0.9415.3
Inferno2730%0.9914.8
Nuke2343%0.9515.2
Vertigo1242%0.8314.4
Overpass1030%0.9614.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.6%Headshot accuracy
34.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.9%Spray accuracy
80.2%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
575msReaction time
21.0%T opening success
39.5%CT opening success
0.45Enemies flashed / flash
6.9%Flash assists
5.42HE damage / grenade
4.79Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.5958% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4494 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 20.9736% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–8-0.0215%5 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0420%5 Sept
mirage3–13-0.017%5 Sept
dust211–13-0.0214%5 Sept
mirage9–130.0426%3 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0616%31 Aug
anubis6–13-0.047%20 Aug
mirage9–130.0114%18 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0214%16 Aug
dust216–120.0220%13 Aug
mirage13–100.0527%11 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0111%8 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0116%2 Aug
anubis14–16-0.026%30 Jul
inferno16–130.0312%1 Jun
mirage13–90.0210%1 Jun
inferno4–13-0.0217%11 Jan
anubis4–13-0.0815%10 Jan
dust27–13-0.0418%10 Jan
mirage10–130.0311%8 Jan
nuke6–13-0.0518%21 Dec
nuke10–13-0.037%21 Dec
inferno9–13-0.0713%25 Aug
mirage2–13-0.1017%8 Aug
vertigo13–11-0.063%28 Sept
mirage13–10-0.089%28 Sept
vertigo3–16-0.057%31 Aug
ancient12–16-0.0415%31 Aug
overpass14–16-0.0710%30 Aug
inferno16–13-0.0116%30 Aug
inferno13–160.0420%29 Aug
mirage11–16-0.0034%29 Aug
ancient25–230.0612%29 Aug
vertigo4–15-0.0614%29 Aug
anubis17–190.0421%28 Aug
mirage16–110.0912%27 Aug
inferno16–90.1422%27 Aug
vertigo15–190.0615%27 Aug
vertigo3–16-0.019%25 Aug
mirage16–70.0512%25 Aug
ancient16–110.039%25 Aug
vertigo16–110.045%25 Aug
mirage10–16-0.0214%24 Aug
inferno16–130.0312%23 Aug
anubis10–160.017%23 Aug
mirage16–50.1221%23 Aug
inferno5–16-0.073%23 Aug
nuke5–16-0.0311%23 Aug
mirage16–70.0114%22 Aug
inferno16–11-0.0317%22 Aug
mirage25–220.0416%21 Aug
mirage19–170.039%20 Aug
dust28–16-0.0510%20 Aug
nuke16–11-0.018%20 Aug
nuke16–100.0017%20 Aug
vertigo10–16-0.026%20 Aug
mirage16–8-0.0316%20 Aug
overpass3–16-0.0415%19 Aug
mirage16–11-0.0217%17 Aug
inferno16–40.058%17 Aug
overpass14–160.037%17 Aug
inferno16–13-0.0323%17 Aug
mirage5–16-0.0510%17 Aug
inferno10–160.0215%17 Aug
overpass19–17-0.045%16 Aug
inferno16–190.0412%16 Aug
inferno16–80.0512%16 Aug
dust216–19-0.045%16 Aug
mirage9–16-0.0618%16 Aug
mirage16–90.0110%16 Aug
mirage16–13-0.0231%15 Aug
ancient13–160.0134%15 Aug
mirage22–20-0.0724%15 Aug
inferno9–16-0.0119%14 Aug
inferno13–16-0.0312%14 Aug
mirage16–140.0214%14 Aug
nuke7–16-0.0311%14 Aug
inferno4–16-0.0711%14 Aug
nuke13–16-0.044%11 Aug
mirage16–20.097%11 Aug
inferno15–190.0215%11 Aug
ancient9–16-0.055%10 Aug
overpass16–130.034%10 Aug
mirage7–160.045%9 Aug
inferno19–160.0219%9 Aug
dust216–14-0.059%8 Aug
inferno10–16-0.0517%8 Aug
inferno16–120.025%8 Aug
vertigo16–110.0915%6 Aug
inferno16–60.0316%6 Aug
inferno8–16-0.088%6 Aug
vertigo6–160.0214%6 Aug
vertigo16–70.0010%5 Aug
nuke15–19-0.0613%31 Jul
inferno12–16-0.076%30 Jul
mirage13–16-0.027%30 Jul
nuke19–160.028%29 Jul
mirage16–12-0.078%29 Jul
inferno16–70.0315%29 Jul
dust215–190.0117%28 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →