impala67

impala67 — CS2 Stats

US76561199082904000[U:1:1122638272]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

363Tracked matches50%Win rate2023Tracked since
449Hours in CS0Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating14,999Blue band · top ~28.4% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5 · 986 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 24 Aug 2026 (48 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,999 -1,243 3 Aug – 24 Aug · 8 days played
14,25016,242peak 16,2423 Aug24 Aug
16,242Peak Premier in tracked matches
986Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
18Days played since 2026-08-03

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 986
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 — 65 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,243 below peak (16,242)
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 1 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,649), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate60.6%43.7%44.8%above
Shot accuracy2.1%12.0%12.4%10.4% short
Kill/death ratio1.111.021.03above
Match win rate51.1%44.7%45.2%above

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGimpala67FACEITLevel 5 · 986 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER14,999 · Blue bandPEAK ELO986csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning42
Utility29

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–42–9Last 10049%Win rateWWWWLLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +4.4pp headshot accuracy · −107ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 30%
  • Avg reaction 622ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 30%
  • Avg reaction 526ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 579ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim7.9
Utility2.9
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels3.1
Clutch0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 37 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 602ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning4.2
Utility2.9
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels1.6
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.05
first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time582ms−83ms
first ⅓ avg 665ms → last ⅓ avg 582ms
Headshot accuracy28.3%+4.0%
first ⅓ avg 24.3% → last ⅓ avg 28.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.40Best match rating · 9–1 · eldorado, 6 Aug →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 9–3 · eldorado, 11 Aug →
391msFastest reaction time · 1–9 · eldorado, 8 Aug →
9–0Biggest win · eldorado, 10 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W4Current streak
10–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

eldoradoBest map · 55% over 31nukeWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
eldoradoA3117–1455%0.05
poseidonA2011–955%0.00
vertigoB158–753%0.02
mirageC83–538%0.01
infernoC83–538%-0.00
nukeD51–420%-0.06
dust2—41–325%0.02
anubis—42–250%-0.01
ancient—20–20%0.04
cache—11–0100%-0.01
overpass—11–0100%-0.04
debris—11–0100%-0.11

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

11,575Lifetime kills
1.11K/D · Top 50% of Level 5 players
704Matches
51.1%Match win rate · Top 10% of Level 5 players
60.6%Headshot % · Top 5% of Level 5 players
2.1%Shot accuracy
2,812MVPs
175Hours (in match)
202Bombs planted
111Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

934inferno
679dust2
494vertigo
422nuke
15train
2cbble
2ar_shoots
1aztec

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

53Matches
53%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
83.8ADR
59%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

20%1v1 clutch win
12%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust21331%1.0015.5
Mirage1331%1.0716.2
Ancient1191%1.0515.9
Anubis650%1.1717.8
Cache560%0.9815.4
Inferno3100%1.2820.7
Nuke250%0.9616.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.5%Headshot accuracy
33.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.6%Spray accuracy
84.3%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
602msReaction time
30.9%T opening success
41.6%CT opening success
0.27Enemies flashed / flash
2.3%Flash assists
5.09HE damage / grenade
8.68Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.2657 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.85% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–100.0026%24 Aug →
inferno13–9-0.0024%24 Aug →
dust26–1-0.0340%24 Aug →
vertigo13–50.1627%23 Aug →
vertigo11–13-0.0733%23 Aug →
vertigo7–9-0.0727%22 Aug →
vertigo9–40.0833%22 Aug →
mirage0–70.000%22 Aug →
mirage8–4-0.0346%21 Aug →
vertigo5–9-0.0042%21 Aug →
eldorado3–9-0.0532%21 Aug →
eldorado9–50.1838%21 Aug →
poseidon9–70.0829%19 Aug →
mirage13–7-0.0126%15 Aug →
poseidon9–7-0.0816%15 Aug →
poseidon4–9-0.1815%15 Aug →
inferno3–13-0.0630%15 Aug →
nuke9–6-0.0619%15 Aug →
eldorado4–9-0.0518%14 Aug →
poseidon3–9-0.0532%14 Aug →
poseidon7–90.0429%14 Aug →
poseidon6–90.0128%13 Aug →
eldorado9–40.1230%13 Aug →
poseidon9–60.0726%13 Aug →
cache13–11-0.0131%13 Aug →
mirage11–130.0524%13 Aug →
mirage12–12-0.0025%13 Aug →
nuke3–9-0.0824%12 Aug →
poseidon3–9-0.0924%12 Aug →
eldorado4–9-0.1615%12 Aug →
eldorado9–40.1946%12 Aug →
poseidon8–80.0036%12 Aug →
poseidon9–7-0.0142%12 Aug →
inferno9–70.0112%12 Aug →
inferno4–9-0.0921%12 Aug →
vertigo6–9-0.0337%12 Aug →
vertigo9–6-0.0513%12 Aug →
poseidon6–90.1032%11 Aug →
vertigo6–9-0.0933%11 Aug →
eldorado9–3-0.0150%11 Aug →
poseidon9–6-0.0917%11 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0218%11 Aug →
vertigo8–80.0744%10 Aug →
poseidon9–70.0128%10 Aug →
poseidon9–20.1232%10 Aug →
poseidon9–4-0.1114%10 Aug →
vertigo9–7-0.0426%10 Aug →
vertigo5–9-0.1126%10 Aug →
vertigo9–30.1019%10 Aug →
vertigo9–40.0216%10 Aug →
poseidon9–20.1725%10 Aug →
eldorado9–50.0933%10 Aug →
eldorado9–00.3730%10 Aug →
eldorado9–60.0638%10 Aug →
eldorado6–90.0220%9 Aug →
inferno6–9-0.0715%9 Aug →
nuke1–9-0.1225%9 Aug →
overpass9–7-0.0412%9 Aug →
anubis6–13-0.0322%8 Aug →
poseidon7–9-0.0620%8 Aug →
poseidon9–70.0542%8 Aug →
nuke5–9-0.1019%8 Aug →
inferno9–30.2248%8 Aug →
eldorado1–9-0.1730%8 Aug →
eldorado8–80.0133%8 Aug →
eldorado9–30.0635%7 Aug →
eldorado9–4-0.0818%7 Aug →
debris9–6-0.1133%7 Aug →
poseidon9–20.1750%7 Aug →
anubis15–150.0221%7 Aug →
vertigo9–50.2019%7 Aug →
eldorado6–90.0714%7 Aug →
inferno8–8-0.0922%7 Aug →
mirage1–130.0826%7 Aug →
dust24–130.0136%7 Aug →
nuke8–80.0729%7 Aug →
eldorado9–50.1723%7 Aug →
dust28–130.1022%7 Aug →
mirage9–130.0117%7 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0230%6 Aug →
anubis13–70.009%6 Aug →
ancient10–130.1028%6 Aug →
poseidon2–9-0.1221%6 Aug →
eldorado7–90.0136%6 Aug →
eldorado9–10.4035%6 Aug →
eldorado8–80.2027%6 Aug →
eldorado6–90.0323%6 Aug →
inferno4–130.0426%6 Aug →
vertigo13–40.1428%5 Aug →
eldorado4–9-0.127%5 Aug →
eldorado9–30.2220%5 Aug →
eldorado9–70.0611%5 Aug →
eldorado8–80.0330%5 Aug →
eldorado7–9-0.0217%5 Aug →
eldorado2–9-0.1013%4 Aug →
anubis13–5-0.0115%3 Aug →
eldorado9–00.1233%3 Aug →
eldorado9–6-0.0324%3 Aug →
eldorado9–5-0.0622%3 Aug →
eldorado9–1-0.0336%3 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.