Pommimies45

Pommimies45 — CS2 Stats

76561199080360758[U:1:1120095030]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,059Tracked matches46%Win rate2021Tracked since
5,346Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.5 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating14,897Blue band · top ~28.9% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,897 -3,305 7 Aug – 14 Oct · 27 days played
14,89718,394peak 18,3947 Aug14 Oct
19,184Peak Premier in tracked matches
29Days played since 2026-08-06

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,497 below peak (18,394)
  • -2,888 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 103 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,247), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate39.8%42.7%43.7%3.9% short
Shot accuracy10.9%11.3%12.0%1.1% short
Kill/death ratio1.040.991.02above
Match win rate41.9%43.9%44.7%2.8% short

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPommimies45FACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER14,897 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim51
Positioning56
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46–47–7Last 10046%Win rateLLLWLLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −4.1pp headshot accuracy · +60ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 569ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 606ms

Last 20

  • 9–10–1 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 575ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim5.1
Utility4.8
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels3.5
Clutch2.8

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 78% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 567ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 68% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.1
Positioning5.6
Utility4.8
Mechanics4.0
Opening Duels3.9
Win Impact3.8

Composite 4.5/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time573ms−20ms
first ⅓ avg 593ms → last ⅓ avg 573ms
Headshot accuracy15.7%+2.4%
first ⅓ avg 13.3% → last ⅓ avg 15.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 9–5 · debris, 13 Aug →
36%Best headshot accuracy · 13–9 · mirage, 29 Sept →
406msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · anubis, 23 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · vertigo, 6 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
L3Current streak
7–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 69% over 16vertigoWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB179–853%-0.03
nukeC177–1041%-0.03
dust2S1611–569%-0.01
infernoD144–1029%-0.02
cacheC94–544%-0.02
vertigoD82–625%0.00
anubisC83–538%-0.01
ancientS64–267%-0.02
debris—31–233%-0.01
italy—10–10%-0.03
overpass—11–0100%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Vertigo is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Vertigo lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

164,590Lifetime kills
1.04K/D · Top 50% of Level 4 players
9,610Matches
41.9%Match win rate
39.8%Headshot %
10.9%Shot accuracy
25,790MVPs
5,346Hours (in match)
5,348Bombs planted
2,499Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4746,553
AWP32,218
AUG3,293
FAMAS2,876
MP92,821

Lifetime map wins

10,749lake
8,302nuke
6,842inferno
5,546dust2
5,323vertigo
2,904train
358office
302cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

258Matches
49%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
89.5ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5650%1.2515.5
Vertigo3554%1.1016.4
Inferno2152%1.2614.7
Anubis2045%1.0215.6
Dust21650%0.9613.2
Ancient1369%1.1616.8
Nuke1242%1.1916.4
Overpass40%0.7413.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.3%Headshot accuracy
28.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.2%Spray accuracy
68.1%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
567msReaction time
43.9%T opening success
47.7%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
4.6%Flash assists
5.74HE damage / grenade
4.29Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Vertigo

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Vertigo callouts & strategy →Vertigo grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–16-0.0217%14 Oct →
mirage12–16-0.0215%8 Oct →
nuke10–130.0410%6 Oct →
vertigo13–00.0925%6 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0114%6 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0419%5 Oct →
ancient13–60.0212%5 Oct →
inferno13–80.0215%5 Oct →
vertigo9–13-0.0214%3 Oct →
mirage13–20.0118%3 Oct →
inferno13–16-0.0213%2 Oct →
anubis13–8-0.0221%2 Oct →
nuke13–80.0416%30 Sept →
dust213–100.0526%30 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.027%30 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0323%30 Sept →
anubis6–130.0418%30 Sept →
anubis15–15-0.0011%30 Sept →
mirage13–90.0136%29 Sept →
mirage13–60.0329%29 Sept →
vertigo12–12-0.1016%29 Sept →
nuke13–9-0.0413%28 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0326%28 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0214%28 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.079%28 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0814%28 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0010%25 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.039%25 Sept →
dust216–14-0.0310%25 Sept →
mirage9–130.0116%25 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.057%25 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.0310%25 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.085%23 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.078%23 Sept →
italy9–13-0.0318%19 Sept →
dust213–2-0.0132%19 Sept →
cache13–9-0.0210%19 Sept →
inferno1–13-0.0819%19 Sept →
overpass13–80.0420%19 Sept →
nuke13–40.0222%18 Sept →
inferno9–130.0120%18 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0314%18 Sept →
inferno7–3-0.0019%18 Sept →
nuke13–6-0.0324%15 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.038%15 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0023%15 Sept →
cache13–90.0424%13 Sept →
mirage1–12-0.0411%13 Sept →
inferno13–60.0315%13 Sept →
nuke4–13-0.068%10 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0416%6 Sept →
ancient13–8-0.079%4 Sept →
nuke16–140.019%4 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.085%4 Sept →
mirage13–5-0.0314%1 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0218%1 Sept →
dust210–130.0113%1 Sept →
dust216–13-0.058%1 Sept →
vertigo11–13-0.0421%1 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0513%30 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0318%25 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0514%25 Aug →
cache13–5-0.095%23 Aug →
dust213–6-0.0216%20 Aug →
dust23–13-0.0827%20 Aug →
cache11–130.0116%20 Aug →
nuke8–130.005%20 Aug →
nuke13–6-0.0511%20 Aug →
vertigo9–20.0817%14 Aug →
dust216–120.0119%14 Aug →
inferno15–150.018%14 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0217%13 Aug →
dust213–80.0124%13 Aug →
debris9–50.1913%13 Aug →
nuke3–9-0.0914%13 Aug →
inferno4–9-0.1519%13 Aug →
debris2–9-0.207%13 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0313%13 Aug →
cache9–13-0.039%13 Aug →
anubis13–20.077%13 Aug →
ancient13–80.0311%13 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0113%13 Aug →
cache16–120.0113%13 Aug →
inferno13–80.0314%12 Aug →
vertigo10–13-0.0118%12 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.0010%8 Aug →
vertigo6–90.0111%7 Aug →
nuke4–90.0214%7 Aug →
anubis7–13-0.0610%7 Aug →
mirage15–15-0.0622%7 Aug →
dust213–100.0413%7 Aug →
nuke13–00.006%7 Aug →
cache8–13-0.0418%7 Aug →
mirage2–13-0.0813%7 Aug →
dust213–5-0.0312%7 Aug →
nuke4–9-0.164%7 Aug →
debris8–8-0.0018%7 Aug →
vertigo8–80.0014%7 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0415%6 Aug →
inferno12–12-0.0112%6 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.