Jun1ori

Jun1ori — CS2 Stats

NE76561199161156187[U:1:1200890459]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,022Tracked matches66%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating8.2 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating22,117Top 50% of 180,525 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#48484 of 224246 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,628 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 17 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 21 days played since 28 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,117 +3,336 28 Aug17 Sept · 18 days played
17,63122,832peak 22,83228 Aug17 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,628 +0 1 Sept3 Sept · 2 observations
1,6281,628peak 1,6281 Sept3 Sept
22,893Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,628Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
21Days played since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,628
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 123 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 715 below peak (22,832)
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 2,883 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-03
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGJun1oriFACEITLevel 9 · 1,628 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER22,117 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,628csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning72
Utility67

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50482Last 10050%Win rateLLWLWLTWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · +2.7pp headshot accuracy · −9ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 564ms

Last 10

  • 451 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 553ms

Last 20

  • 1181 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 557ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim8.5
Utility6.7
Positioning7.2
Opening Duels6.8
Clutch4.2

Sharp aimerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 85 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 62% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

T openings. 62% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Flashes. 0.76 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 554ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning7.2
Utility6.7
Mechanics8.3
Opening Duels8.0
Win Impact10.0

Composite 8.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time552ms−45ms
first ⅓ avg 597ms → last ⅓ avg 552ms
Headshot accuracy19.5%−3.0%
first ⅓ avg 22.5% → last ⅓ avg 19.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 6–2 · inferno, 16 Sept
48%Best headshot accuracy · 9–1 · nuke, 30 Aug
391msFastest reaction time · 2–13 · anubis, 15 Sept
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 14 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
47In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 69% over 13mirageWeakest map · 25% over 20
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB21101148%0.04
mirageD2051525%0.02
nukeS1812667%0.02
ancientS139469%0.02
cacheA95456%0.05
anubisD62433%0.02
dust2440100%-0.01
vertigo41325%0.00
overpass2020%-0.01
debris21150%-0.07
train110100%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 20). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

467Matches
53%Win rate
1.11Avg K/D
83.8ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage8645%1.0816.5
Nuke3951%1.1417.9
Inferno3361%1.1716.8
Ancient3050%1.1017.1
Dust22548%1.1615.7
Anubis2060%1.0114.9
Vertigo1250%1.0117.3
Cache1080%1.1116.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.8%Headshot accuracy
36.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.8%Spray accuracy
87.2%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
554msReaction time
62.0%T opening success
62.2%CT opening success
0.76Enemies flashed / flash
7.7%Flash assists
10.72HE damage / grenade
12.68Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 20 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage10–13-0.0225%17 Sept
mirage5–130.1021%16 Sept
inferno6–20.1630%16 Sept
nuke5–13-0.097%16 Sept
dust213–8-0.0914%15 Sept
anubis14–16-0.0431%15 Sept
nuke15–150.0423%15 Sept
mirage13–80.0213%15 Sept
inferno13–80.0724%15 Sept
anubis2–13-0.0719%15 Sept
nuke13–50.0924%15 Sept
ancient13–110.0113%15 Sept
mirage19–160.0413%15 Sept
inferno13–40.0721%14 Sept
inferno11–130.0722%14 Sept
nuke13–6-0.0113%14 Sept
cache10–30.038%14 Sept
mirage13–10.0827%14 Sept
inferno9–13-0.0520%14 Sept
inferno12–16-0.0121%13 Sept
ancient13–70.0621%13 Sept
nuke13–80.0531%13 Sept
nuke16–120.0419%12 Sept
inferno13–50.0914%12 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0113%12 Sept
ancient7–13-0.0312%12 Sept
nuke13–20.0413%11 Sept
inferno13–90.0626%10 Sept
anubis13–110.0838%10 Sept
ancient13–60.1214%9 Sept
mirage10–130.0215%9 Sept
nuke19–170.0123%9 Sept
overpass9–130.0117%9 Sept
inferno5–130.0924%9 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0023%9 Sept
vertigo10–13-0.0216%8 Sept
cache11–130.0730%8 Sept
vertigo22–180.0419%8 Sept
cache11–130.0517%8 Sept
vertigo1–9-0.0510%8 Sept
nuke12–120.0428%8 Sept
mirage8–130.1118%7 Sept
inferno8–130.1419%7 Sept
anubis13–100.1120%7 Sept
nuke13–100.0513%7 Sept
mirage5–13-0.0416%7 Sept
nuke7–13-0.0014%7 Sept
ancient16–120.0317%7 Sept
inferno10–130.0629%6 Sept
ancient13–40.0113%6 Sept
nuke9–13-0.0220%6 Sept
mirage13–100.0523%5 Sept
cache13–110.0412%5 Sept
nuke12–16-0.0419%5 Sept
dust213–70.0535%5 Sept
ancient6–13-0.0116%4 Sept
mirage1–13-0.0614%4 Sept
nuke13–30.0212%4 Sept
nuke13–50.0436%4 Sept
cache13–30.1428%3 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0413%3 Sept
inferno13–90.0629%3 Sept
mirage13–60.0019%3 Sept
anubis6–130.0310%2 Sept
inferno5–13-0.0421%2 Sept
ancient13–40.1334%1 Sept
cache13–60.0120%1 Sept
mirage8–130.0426%1 Sept
inferno13–90.0015%1 Sept
dust213–7-0.0311%1 Sept
inferno13–80.0124%1 Sept
train13–5-0.0319%1 Sept
debris9–5-0.0716%1 Sept
ancient8–13-0.0325%1 Sept
ancient13–8-0.0618%31 Aug
inferno11–130.0216%31 Aug
nuke13–70.0521%31 Aug
nuke13–80.0322%31 Aug
ancient13–70.0614%31 Aug
mirage10–130.0330%30 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0114%30 Aug
inferno13–40.0921%30 Aug
mirage7–130.0217%30 Aug
nuke9–10.1148%30 Aug
dust213–90.0321%30 Aug
inferno13–80.0420%30 Aug
ancient13–50.0320%30 Aug
cache3–130.0124%30 Aug
vertigo10–130.0342%30 Aug
inferno5–130.0230%30 Aug
overpass4–13-0.0419%30 Aug
cache11–130.0127%29 Aug
mirage4–130.0430%29 Aug
mirage6–130.0220%29 Aug
debris6–9-0.0729%29 Aug
inferno2–9-0.1227%29 Aug
mirage12–160.0223%28 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0118%28 Aug
cache13–60.1117%28 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0319%28 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →