TAO DA TOI NOI

TAO DA TOI NOI — CS2 Stats

CG76561199070224905[U:1:1109959177]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

725Tracked matches46%Win rate2020Tracked since
678Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating20,793Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#11480 of 31807 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=928), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate44.3%42.5%44.2%meets
Shot accuracy12.3%10.9%11.2%above
Kill/death ratio0.990.991.040.05 short
Match win rate48.0%44.2%45.3%above

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTAO DA TOI NOIFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER20,793 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim70
Positioning64
Utility66

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD50446Last 10050%Win rateWLLTLTWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.0
Aggression9.1
Utility6.6
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels4.5

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 599ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.0
Positioning6.4
Utility6.6
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels4.5
Win Impact3.7

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time606ms+28ms
first ⅓ avg 578ms → last ⅓ avg 606ms
Headshot accuracy19.6%−1.3%
first ⅓ avg 20.9% → last ⅓ avg 19.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — dust2 13–8
132Biggest win — dust2
5Longest win streak
96In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 56% over 16anubisWeakest map · 35% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B36191753%0.01
infernoB25121348%-0.01
anubisC1761135%-0.01
ancientA169756%-0.01
overpass43175%0.03
nuke110100%0.01
cache1010%0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (35% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

26,814Lifetime kills
0.99K/D
1,430Matches
48.0%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 4 players
44.3%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 4 players
12.3%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 4 players
3,252MVPs
678Hours (in match)
1,480Bombs planted
422Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

5,456inferno
3,766dust2
151train
56vertigo
55nuke
9office
4assault

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.2%Headshot accuracy
32.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.9%Spray accuracy
80.0%Counter-strafing
8.7°Preaim
599msReaction time
48.5%T opening success
47.7%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
4.8%Flash assists
8.72HE damage / grenade
15.18Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

35% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–50.0420%28 Jun
dust214–160.0513%28 Jun
inferno1–12-0.0133%28 Jun
dust215–150.0422%28 Jun
dust28–130.0629%28 Jun
anubis15–150.0419%28 Jun
dust213–80.0730%28 Jun
dust29–130.0518%27 Jun
ancient13–6-0.0719%27 Jun
inferno2–13-0.0814%27 Jun
anubis13–80.0618%27 Jun
inferno0–13-0.126%27 Jun
inferno11–130.0123%27 Jun
anubis10–130.0113%27 Jun
inferno13–100.0519%27 Jun
inferno15–15-0.0721%25 Jun
ancient13–80.0015%25 Jun
anubis6–13-0.0220%25 Jun
dust28–130.0225%24 Jun
inferno14–160.0215%24 Jun
dust213–80.1121%24 Jun
nuke13–70.0124%24 Jun
ancient13–80.0126%17 Jun
dust215–15-0.0612%17 Jun
anubis13–3-0.0419%17 Jun
inferno9–130.0512%16 Jun
dust216–120.0219%16 Jun
dust20–13-0.0326%16 Jun
anubis6–13-0.0416%16 Jun
ancient13–50.0315%15 Jun
inferno13–60.0328%15 Jun
dust213–11-0.0114%15 Jun
dust28–13-0.0123%15 Jun
dust29–13-0.0523%14 Jun
inferno13–11-0.0219%14 Jun
ancient13–60.0524%14 Jun
anubis13–70.1134%14 Jun
dust24–13-0.0610%13 Jun
ancient13–100.0325%13 Jun
inferno9–130.0228%13 Jun
dust26–13-0.0820%12 Jun
ancient8–130.0427%12 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0520%12 Jun
anubis8–13-0.0420%12 Jun
cache8–130.0914%10 Jun
dust213–11-0.0618%10 Jun
inferno9–13-0.0414%7 Jun
anubis0–13-0.060%5 Jun
dust213–8-0.0724%5 Jun
inferno13–8-0.0114%5 Jun
anubis2–13-0.0028%5 Jun
dust213–90.0721%5 Jun
dust213–50.0520%3 Jun
anubis13–9-0.0319%3 Jun
ancient3–13-0.1021%3 Jun
dust213–2-0.0121%3 Jun
dust213–30.0212%3 Jun
dust216–14-0.0218%1 Jun
inferno5–13-0.029%1 Jun
ancient8–13-0.0515%1 Jun
dust211–130.0719%1 Jun
overpass13–70.0111%1 Jun
dust27–13-0.058%31 May
anubis4–13-0.054%31 May
anubis9–130.0316%31 May
dust213–110.1031%31 May
inferno13–100.0421%31 May
inferno0–13-0.0926%31 May
ancient11–130.0719%31 May
dust213–60.0127%31 May
ancient9–13-0.0236%28 May
dust215–150.0124%28 May
overpass13–70.0825%28 May
anubis13–100.0013%28 May
dust213–6-0.0217%26 May
ancient2–13-0.1111%26 May
dust213–9-0.0216%26 May
inferno13–100.0321%26 May
dust211–13-0.0310%26 May
dust213–100.0318%25 May
inferno12–12-0.0018%25 May
inferno13–11-0.0117%24 May
ancient6–13-0.1212%24 May
anubis9–20.0224%24 May
inferno16–12-0.0121%24 May
dust213–110.0120%24 May
ancient13–11-0.0410%24 May
dust213–110.0623%24 May
anubis6–13-0.0029%24 May
anubis6–13-0.0813%29 Apr
inferno13–8-0.0228%29 Apr
ancient13–30.0526%25 Apr
overpass13–50.1122%25 Apr
dust28–130.0224%25 Apr
inferno13–40.0621%25 Apr
dust213–10-0.0213%22 Apr
overpass4–13-0.0726%22 Apr
dust24–13-0.0331%22 Apr
inferno13–100.0128%21 Apr
inferno13–7-0.0323%21 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →