ANCBrickFighter

ANCBrickFighter — CS2 Stats

76561199067160064[U:1:1106894336]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,727Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,567Hours in CS49Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating18,960Top 50% of 180,525 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~12.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#87369 of 224477 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 17 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

−203Premier CS Rating · 19,163 → 18,960
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 19 days played since 22 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,960 +727 22 Aug18 Sept · 19 days played
16,92919,830peak 19,83022 Aug18 Sept
19,830Peak Premier in tracked matches
19Days played since 2026-08-22

Premier CS Rating

  • 870 below peak (19,830)
  • +727 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 1,040 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches26
Win rate35%
K/D0.84
Headshot %41%

Measured 11 Sep 202618 Sep 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,413), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate36.9%42.7%43.8%6.9% short
Shot accuracy10.4%11.2%12.0%1.5% short
Kill/death ratio0.781.001.020.24 short
Match win rate42.5%43.9%44.7%2.3% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 5 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGANCBrickFighterFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER18,960 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66
Positioning50
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52471Last 10052%Win rateLWWWLLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −5.4pp headshot accuracy · −13ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 9%
  • Avg reaction 623ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 9%
  • Avg reaction 588ms

Last 20

  • 1010 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 594ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim6.6
Utility4.8
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch3.0

Strong T-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 47% on T to 20% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 563ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6
Positioning5.0
Utility4.8
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact4.4

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time563ms+19ms
first ⅓ avg 545ms → last ⅓ avg 563ms
Headshot accuracy13.0%+0.8%
first ⅓ avg 12.2% → last ⅓ avg 13.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–8 · mirage, 31 Aug
26%Best headshot accuracy · 13–7 · cache, 6 Sept
398msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · anubis, 11 Sept
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 22 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
110In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 63% over 8ancientWeakest map · 31% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB23121152%-0.01
dust2A2213959%-0.00
anubisC167944%-0.01
ancientD134931%-0.03
nukeA106460%-0.00
infernoA85363%0.00
cacheA74357%-0.00
overpass110100%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

57,106Lifetime kills
0.78K/D
3,997Matches
42.5%Match win rate
36.9%Headshot %
10.4%Shot accuracy
5,779MVPs
1,780Hours (in match)
4,326Bombs planted
928Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4718,254
MP92,769
AWP2,439
MAC-101,586
P901,395

Lifetime map wins

6,928dust2
6,176inferno
3,784nuke
3,051vertigo
539train
87office
29ar_shoots
26italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

55Matches
11%Win rate
0.68Avg K/D
69.9ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
6%1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage128%0.649.0
Nuke1233%0.9013.4
Inferno80%0.6810.6
Vertigo70%0.628.9
Overpass520%0.7010.6
Anubis50%0.395.6
Ancient30%0.7610.7
Dust230%0.396.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.1%Headshot accuracy
35.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.2%Spray accuracy
76.5%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
563msReaction time
47.5%T opening success
19.8%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
4.6%Flash assists
5.17HE damage / grenade
9.07Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.1098% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 19.7539% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis5–13-0.057%18 Sept
dust213–70.0211%17 Sept
dust28–10.026%17 Sept
anubis13–50.088%17 Sept
mirage5–13-0.0413%17 Sept
ancient6–13-0.019%17 Sept
dust28–13-0.048%17 Sept
inferno13–70.0614%16 Sept
mirage5–13-0.0613%16 Sept
nuke4–130.004%16 Sept
nuke13–50.059%15 Sept
anubis9–130.0018%15 Sept
anubis9–13-0.024%14 Sept
mirage13–90.0021%14 Sept
nuke13–80.0319%13 Sept
dust213–30.0617%13 Sept
anubis2–13-0.059%13 Sept
cache13–10-0.0422%13 Sept
mirage13–70.0012%13 Sept
mirage5–13-0.0816%13 Sept
inferno13–5-0.0415%13 Sept
dust24–130.0122%13 Sept
anubis1–13-0.0814%13 Sept
dust215–15-0.0116%13 Sept
mirage4–13-0.0616%13 Sept
ancient2–13-0.0714%13 Sept
ancient13–7-0.0410%11 Sept
dust211–13-0.0411%11 Sept
dust213–9-0.029%11 Sept
anubis13–100.0918%11 Sept
cache13–80.0416%11 Sept
ancient13–90.0214%11 Sept
nuke3–13-0.0315%11 Sept
inferno13–90.0223%11 Sept
anubis13–10-0.0417%11 Sept
nuke5–13-0.0617%11 Sept
mirage13–60.0317%11 Sept
ancient7–130.0326%9 Sept
dust25–13-0.0514%9 Sept
mirage13–70.0217%9 Sept
mirage13–20.018%9 Sept
ancient4–13-0.066%9 Sept
anubis4–13-0.078%8 Sept
mirage13–7-0.0118%8 Sept
ancient8–13-0.0112%7 Sept
dust211–13-0.0222%7 Sept
nuke16–140.0313%7 Sept
mirage14–16-0.0118%7 Sept
ancient13–2-0.0510%7 Sept
cache4–130.0312%7 Sept
dust213–5-0.024%7 Sept
mirage13–90.079%7 Sept
cache13–7-0.0026%6 Sept
mirage13–50.058%5 Sept
ancient16–13-0.074%5 Sept
dust213–3-0.0219%5 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0520%5 Sept
nuke13–90.0214%5 Sept
dust211–130.037%5 Sept
ancient12–16-0.078%3 Sept
mirage6–13-0.049%3 Sept
anubis9–130.0319%3 Sept
anubis5–13-0.093%3 Sept
mirage16–120.0014%3 Sept
nuke13–40.0118%3 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0414%3 Sept
nuke6–13-0.0118%3 Sept
mirage13–20.0419%2 Sept
dust213–80.0515%2 Sept
cache8–13-0.0617%2 Sept
inferno13–100.0214%2 Sept
inferno13–40.0513%2 Sept
overpass13–100.0314%2 Sept
inferno3–13-0.046%2 Sept
anubis7–130.009%2 Sept
dust213–70.058%2 Sept
ancient6–13-0.039%1 Sept
dust213–20.037%1 Sept
anubis13–7-0.026%1 Sept
ancient5–13-0.0311%1 Sept
mirage3–13-0.0621%1 Sept
dust213–7-0.038%1 Sept
dust216–130.0220%1 Sept
mirage13–80.128%31 Aug
anubis13–9-0.015%31 Aug
ancient11–130.0518%31 Aug
mirage11–130.0215%30 Aug
dust211–13-0.0216%30 Aug
dust211–130.0215%30 Aug
anubis13–80.0210%30 Aug
nuke13–10-0.068%30 Aug
anubis13–90.0210%30 Aug
mirage9–13-0.046%30 Aug
mirage13–4-0.0317%30 Aug
inferno11–13-0.027%24 Aug
cache4–13-0.045%24 Aug
dust213–7-0.0616%22 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0219%22 Aug
dust213–1-0.0314%22 Aug
cache13–10.0418%22 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →