Freckle

Freckle — CS2 Stats

DE76561199065212111[U:1:1104946383]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,250Tracked matches67%Win rate2021Tracked since
1,068Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating17,836Purple band · top ~17.1% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,255 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 30 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,836 -2,023 27 Aug – 30 Sept · 23 days played
15,76519,999peak 19,99927 Aug30 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,255 +0 30 Aug – 20 Sept · 6 observations
1,2551,255peak 1,25530 Aug20 Sept
19,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,255Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
26Days played since 2026-08-27

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,255
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 — 96 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,163 below peak (19,999)
  • -2,056 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 2,164 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches76——
Win rate53%——
K/D1.05——
Headshot %42%——

Measured 1 Sep 2026 → 1 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,870), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate42.6%45.7%46.8%4.2% short
Shot accuracy2.1%12.7%13.0%10.9% short
Kill/death ratio0.981.051.060.08 short
Match win rate45.3%45.7%46.3%1.0% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 8 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGFreckleFACEITLevel 7 · 1,255 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER17,836 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,255csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning53
Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51–49Last 10051%Win rateWWWWLWLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −1.5pp headshot accuracy · −13ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 550ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 540ms

Last 20

  • 14–6 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 546ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim7.9
Utility5.6
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels3.0
Clutch4.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 554ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning5.3
Utility5.6
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels3.6
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time562ms−11ms
first ⅓ avg 573ms → last ⅓ avg 562ms
Headshot accuracy16.1%+0.9%
first ⅓ avg 15.3% → last ⅓ avg 16.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–6 · anubis, 19 Sept →
35%Best headshot accuracy · 13–4 · dust2, 30 Sept →
328msFastest reaction time · 13–2 · dust2, 27 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 23 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
W4Current streak
5–13In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 83% over 6anubisWeakest map · 42% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B4021–1953%-0.00
infernoC167–944%-0.01
cacheA138–562%0.01
anubisC125–742%0.01
ancientB105–550%0.01
mirageS65–183%0.03
nuke—20–20%-0.01
vertigo—10–10%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (42% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

45,827Lifetime kills
0.98K/D
2,656Matches
45.3%Match win rate
42.6%Headshot %
2.1%Shot accuracy
5,387MVPs
1,068Hours (in match)
2,045Bombs planted
676Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

5,504dust2
5,093inferno
3,099nuke
2,016vertigo
269train
188lake
80office
28italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

151Matches
56%Win rate
1.17Avg K/D
82.4ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust24353%1.0815.0
Inferno2969%1.4216.1
Mirage2045%1.0715.4
Anubis1560%1.0516.1
Ancient1338%1.1515.9
Cache967%1.2120.9
Nuke650%1.1515.7
Vertigo475%1.4014.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.0%Headshot accuracy
38.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.6%Spray accuracy
82.4%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
554msReaction time
49.2%T opening success
39.7%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
3.6%Flash assists
8.82HE damage / grenade
10.60Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 39.7246% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–50.047%30 Sept →
dust213–40.0535%30 Sept →
cache13–9-0.0213%30 Sept →
dust213–50.0321%28 Sept →
dust214–16-0.0119%28 Sept →
mirage13–100.0031%26 Sept →
mirage11–130.027%26 Sept →
ancient6–130.025%25 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.0112%24 Sept →
ancient2–13-0.055%24 Sept →
cache13–60.0210%24 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0016%24 Sept →
dust213–10.0724%23 Sept →
dust213–7-0.0318%23 Sept →
cache11–130.0120%23 Sept →
cache19–160.0215%21 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0522%21 Sept →
dust216–130.0422%19 Sept →
inferno13–100.0510%19 Sept →
dust213–10.0113%19 Sept →
dust213–60.0321%19 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0511%19 Sept →
dust213–90.0015%19 Sept →
anubis13–60.1120%19 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0224%19 Sept →
nuke12–16-0.0317%19 Sept →
mirage13–90.0814%19 Sept →
dust28–13-0.036%19 Sept →
inferno19–160.0314%18 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0011%18 Sept →
dust29–13-0.099%18 Sept →
inferno13–4-0.0514%18 Sept →
dust213–30.0130%18 Sept →
dust213–90.0117%18 Sept →
ancient11–130.028%17 Sept →
vertigo2–13-0.060%17 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0411%14 Sept →
inferno13–50.0114%14 Sept →
cache13–110.028%14 Sept →
dust213–100.0323%14 Sept →
dust216–130.0013%13 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0820%13 Sept →
ancient11–130.0311%13 Sept →
anubis14–16-0.0117%13 Sept →
ancient13–6-0.0317%11 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0114%11 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.039%11 Sept →
anubis10–130.0313%11 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0214%11 Sept →
dust213–20.1122%11 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0717%11 Sept →
dust213–11-0.045%10 Sept →
dust213–40.0118%10 Sept →
inferno16–13-0.0413%10 Sept →
cache22–180.0413%9 Sept →
nuke2–130.0023%8 Sept →
dust210–130.0420%8 Sept →
dust26–13-0.109%7 Sept →
cache13–100.0223%7 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0818%7 Sept →
ancient13–50.049%7 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0017%6 Sept →
dust213–80.0521%6 Sept →
anubis13–80.0212%6 Sept →
cache11–130.0215%4 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0311%4 Sept →
dust23–130.0519%4 Sept →
inferno11–130.0719%4 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.0227%4 Sept →
cache13–70.0211%4 Sept →
dust25–130.0711%3 Sept →
anubis7–130.0823%3 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0511%3 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0318%2 Sept →
dust28–130.0423%2 Sept →
inferno13–16-0.0211%2 Sept →
dust213–100.0018%2 Sept →
cache16–120.043%31 Aug →
dust211–130.0112%31 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0617%30 Aug →
mirage16–120.0111%30 Aug →
dust213–100.0520%30 Aug →
inferno4–13-0.088%30 Aug →
anubis4–130.0217%29 Aug →
inferno16–12-0.0215%29 Aug →
ancient16–140.0311%29 Aug →
dust24–13-0.0331%29 Aug →
anubis13–90.0317%29 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.0232%29 Aug →
dust26–130.0210%29 Aug →
dust215–19-0.0113%29 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0420%28 Aug →
dust26–13-0.064%28 Aug →
dust213–7-0.0212%28 Aug →
mirage13–20.0514%28 Aug →
dust213–10-0.0413%28 Aug →
ancient13–20.067%27 Aug →
inferno9–130.0221%27 Aug →
anubis8–130.0110%27 Aug →
dust213–2-0.0114%27 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.