sinegz

sinegz — CS2 Stats

DE76561199065203541[U:1:1104937813]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,200Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,046Hours in CS33Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.0 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating20,552Top 50% of 212,133 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#75562 of 259149 tracked
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 28 Oct 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,552 -1,187 11 Sept – 28 Oct · 23 days played
18,60121,887peak 21,88711 Sept28 Oct
22,649Peak Premier in tracked matches
23Days played since 2026-09-11

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,335 below peak (21,887)
  • -1,335 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 4,448 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-11
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-11

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,132), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate66.2%48.2%50.9%above
Shot accuracy7.8%13.2%13.7%6.0% short
Kill/death ratio1.591.071.09above
Match win rate49.3%46.9%48.4%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGsinegzFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER20,552 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning77
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51–45–4Last 10051%Win rateWLWLWLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +7.0pp headshot accuracy · +38ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 32%
  • Avg reaction 609ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 30%
  • Avg reaction 614ms

Last 20

  • 11–8–1 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 595ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.3 against its own average).

Aim7.4
Utility4.9
Positioning7.7
Opening Duels6.1
Clutch3.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 62% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 607ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning7.7
Utility4.9
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels7.4
Win Impact6.7

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time600ms+43ms
first ⅓ avg 558ms → last ⅓ avg 600ms
Headshot accuracy27.7%+2.8%
first ⅓ avg 25.0% → last ⅓ avg 27.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–3 · mirage, 16 Oct →
47%Best headshot accuracy · 13–4 · ancient, 2 Oct →
359msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · ancient, 5 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · italy, 26 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
7–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 88% over 8nukeWeakest map · 36% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B209–1145%0.01
cacheC166–1038%0.01
infernoB158–753%0.03
ancientS118–373%0.01
nukeC114–736%-0.01
mirageC104–640%0.02
anubisS87–188%0.03
train—21–150%0.02
fachwerk—22–0100%0.10
rush_001—20–20%0.01
italy—11–0100%0.04
vertigo—10–10%0.04
office—11–0100%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

67,131Lifetime kills
1.59K/D · Top 5% of Level 9 players
2,570Matches
49.3%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 9 players
66.2%Headshot % · Top 5% of Level 9 players
7.8%Shot accuracy
7,015MVPs
1,045Hours (in match)
3,945Bombs planted
1,169Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4727,760
AWP5,621
FAMAS2,401
MP91,659
SSG 081,010

Lifetime map wins

4,258inferno
3,532dust2
2,191nuke
1,742vertigo
530train
279office
197cbble
18ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

498Matches
53%Win rate
1.09Avg K/D
71.6ADR
56%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage9943%1.0215.1
Inferno8353%1.1416.3
Ancient7757%1.1215.1
Dust26754%1.0515.0
Anubis5452%0.9214.7
Vertigo3858%1.1816.0
Overpass2658%1.2714.8
Nuke2152%1.0315.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

27.2%Headshot accuracy
33.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.9%Spray accuracy
77.4%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
607msReaction time
62.1%T opening success
57.1%CT opening success
0.43Enemies flashed / flash
4.7%Flash assists
7.04HE damage / grenade
17.90Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4338 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–8-0.0220%28 Oct →
nuke10–13-0.0126%26 Oct →
italy13–00.0443%26 Oct →
vertigo9–130.0437%26 Oct →
office13–110.0734%26 Oct →
inferno11–130.1024%25 Oct →
nuke10–130.0123%25 Oct →
cache13–90.0431%25 Oct →
dust213–80.0737%25 Oct →
inferno13–80.0126%25 Oct →
inferno5–10.0415%25 Oct →
cache14–16-0.0332%25 Oct →
inferno4–130.1224%25 Oct →
anubis13–8-0.0220%25 Oct →
dust212–120.0826%24 Oct →
dust210–130.1124%22 Oct →
dust210–130.0322%22 Oct →
ancient13–9-0.0117%22 Oct →
train13–4-0.0322%22 Oct →
inferno13–10.0930%21 Oct →
inferno13–110.0634%20 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0228%20 Oct →
nuke13–8-0.0235%19 Oct →
ancient13–30.0226%19 Oct →
cache13–20.0339%19 Oct →
inferno11–130.0114%18 Oct →
nuke11–130.0427%18 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0319%18 Oct →
cache13–60.0523%18 Oct →
train6–130.0738%17 Oct →
anubis13–70.0333%17 Oct →
nuke13–3-0.0031%17 Oct →
ancient13–60.0336%17 Oct →
dust213–110.0021%17 Oct →
dust216–13-0.0618%17 Oct →
fachwerk13–100.0735%16 Oct →
mirage13–30.1621%16 Oct →
inferno13–70.0927%16 Oct →
fachwerk13–50.1327%16 Oct →
dust28–130.0326%16 Oct →
cache13–30.0639%16 Oct →
cache13–110.0733%16 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0635%16 Oct →
inferno13–110.0316%16 Oct →
dust213–6-0.0533%16 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0018%15 Oct →
dust215–15-0.0124%15 Oct →
ancient13–30.0319%15 Oct →
inferno4–13-0.0323%15 Oct →
cache9–130.0124%15 Oct →
inferno13–110.0530%15 Oct →
dust213–10-0.0321%15 Oct →
anubis16–130.0424%15 Oct →
dust215–150.0121%13 Oct →
anubis13–90.1236%13 Oct →
ancient13–7-0.0129%13 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0327%13 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0121%13 Oct →
dust213–20.0339%13 Oct →
inferno9–2-0.0723%13 Oct →
anubis13–30.0529%12 Oct →
mirage13–40.1135%12 Oct →
dust26–130.0020%12 Oct →
cache5–130.0017%9 Oct →
dust216–130.0118%8 Oct →
dust213–50.0024%8 Oct →
mirage1–5-0.080%8 Oct →
mirage13–60.1023%8 Oct →
cache16–140.0721%7 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.0731%6 Oct →
inferno2–13-0.0627%6 Oct →
nuke13–2-0.0222%6 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0817%6 Oct →
cache7–13-0.0224%5 Oct →
ancient4–130.0131%5 Oct →
rush_0015–80.1413%5 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.0516%5 Oct →
anubis10–130.0321%5 Oct →
ancient8–130.0017%5 Oct →
nuke13–1-0.0026%5 Oct →
cache8–13-0.0426%5 Oct →
cache5–130.0538%4 Oct →
anubis13–40.0232%4 Oct →
nuke15–150.0131%4 Oct →
mirage10–130.0126%4 Oct →
rush_0013–7-0.1142%4 Oct →
dust28–130.0424%3 Oct →
anubis13–5-0.0414%3 Oct →
ancient7–130.0016%3 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0727%3 Oct →
mirage13–70.0423%3 Oct →
ancient13–30.0521%3 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0619%3 Oct →
cache10–13-0.0222%3 Oct →
nuke2–13-0.0125%3 Oct →
cache12–160.0232%2 Oct →
inferno7–130.0019%2 Oct →
nuke13–16-0.0621%2 Oct →
ancient13–40.0247%2 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0029%1 Oct →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.