MrManiti

MrManiti — CS2 Stats

76561199061641700[U:1:1101375972]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

359Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
503Hours in CS7Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.9 DevelopingAll-Rounder
Premier CS Rating13,894Blue band · top ~34.3% of ranked players (population est.)
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 5 Sep 2026 (13 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 18 days played since 17 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 13,894 +1,421 17 Aug5 Sept · 18 days played
12,47315,005peak 15,00517 Aug5 Sept
15,122Peak Premier in tracked matches
18Days played since 2026-08-17

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,111 below peak (15,005)
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 1,106 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Blue band among CSDB-tracked players (n=19,543), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerBlue band medianPurple band medianvs Purple band
Headshot rate41.0%41.9%44.3%3.3% short
Shot accuracy15.9%9.6%11.8%above
Kill/death ratio0.880.981.030.15 short
Match win rate42.7%43.8%45.2%2.5% short

This profile matches the typical Purple band player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Purple band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMrManitiPREMIER13,894 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning37
Utility36

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53443Last 10053%Win rateLLWLWWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +2.4pp headshot accuracy · −44ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 538ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 584ms

Last 20

  • 1010 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 606ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-RounderNo style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim7.2
Utility3.6
Positioning3.7
Opening Duels2.3

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 34 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 43% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 602ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning3.7
Utility3.6
Mechanics5.5
Opening Duels1.6
Win Impact7.2

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time603ms+33ms
first ⅓ avg 570ms → last ⅓ avg 603ms
Headshot accuracy13.6%−1.8%
first ⅓ avg 15.3% → last ⅓ avg 13.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–8 · cache, 5 Sept
33%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · cache, 22 Aug
430msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · ancient, 22 Aug
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 4 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L2Current streak
89In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 73% over 11nukeWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB31161552%-0.01
dust2A1610663%0.01
ancientB168850%-0.00
infernoC135838%-0.02
cacheS118373%-0.01
anubisA74357%-0.01
nukeD62433%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

10,617Lifetime kills
0.88K/D
630Matches
42.7%Match win rate
41.0%Headshot %
15.9%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Blue band
1,325MVPs
329Hours (in match)
382Bombs planted
188Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,179inferno
1,064dust2
463nuke
386vertigo
233train
5cbble
2lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.3%Headshot accuracy
40.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.7%Spray accuracy
74.8%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
602msReaction time
27.3%T opening success
43.0%CT opening success
0.35Enemies flashed / flash
2.4%Flash assists
8.29HE damage / grenade
5.34Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.2577% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3507 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.2754% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage10–13-0.0213%5 Sept
nuke7–130.0511%5 Sept
dust213–4-0.0111%5 Sept
cache5–13-0.0817%5 Sept
cache13–80.1516%5 Sept
mirage13–110.0114%5 Sept
dust27–13-0.0621%5 Sept
dust23–13-0.0617%5 Sept
dust210–13-0.0513%5 Sept
mirage13–100.0714%5 Sept
dust213–10.0915%4 Sept
mirage13–4-0.0111%4 Sept
inferno7–130.0113%3 Sept
mirage16–13-0.0316%3 Sept
mirage11–13-0.016%3 Sept
inferno13–30.0110%3 Sept
inferno10–13-0.0015%2 Sept
mirage13–70.0110%2 Sept
nuke13–8-0.077%2 Sept
mirage9–13-0.0619%2 Sept
mirage3–13-0.0113%2 Sept
nuke13–110.0119%2 Sept
dust213–70.0110%2 Sept
dust29–13-0.0616%31 Aug
anubis9–13-0.015%30 Aug
ancient13–30.1013%30 Aug
anubis13–90.0511%30 Aug
inferno13–50.0221%30 Aug
cache13–80.006%30 Aug
mirage13–3-0.0216%30 Aug
ancient13–30.0420%30 Aug
cache13–110.0218%30 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0211%30 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0118%29 Aug
ancient13–70.029%29 Aug
dust213–3-0.0513%29 Aug
ancient7–13-0.039%29 Aug
cache1–13-0.0522%29 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0214%29 Aug
dust213–110.0316%29 Aug
nuke7–130.1127%29 Aug
dust213–100.0924%29 Aug
dust211–13-0.0220%29 Aug
mirage9–130.0225%29 Aug
mirage13–110.0512%29 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0213%29 Aug
ancient5–13-0.029%29 Aug
ancient7–130.0112%29 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0015%29 Aug
mirage9–13-0.055%29 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0310%28 Aug
anubis13–80.0411%28 Aug
mirage14–16-0.0418%28 Aug
inferno11–13-0.039%28 Aug
ancient3–130.0212%27 Aug
anubis13–5-0.0311%27 Aug
mirage13–50.1524%27 Aug
cache13–8-0.0516%26 Aug
dust213–50.0819%26 Aug
ancient13–16-0.056%26 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0813%26 Aug
ancient13–4-0.014%25 Aug
mirage13–110.0515%25 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0125%25 Aug
cache13–9-0.0116%24 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0212%24 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0617%23 Aug
mirage13–30.0320%23 Aug
cache13–9-0.0519%23 Aug
inferno13–16-0.0525%23 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0115%23 Aug
ancient14–16-0.0017%22 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0211%22 Aug
cache13–3-0.0033%22 Aug
anubis13–6-0.0711%22 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0417%22 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0227%22 Aug
ancient11–130.0212%22 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0610%22 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0019%22 Aug
inferno13–10-0.016%22 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0414%22 Aug
ancient13–9-0.039%21 Aug
dust213–20.0613%21 Aug
dust213–70.0127%21 Aug
cache13–10-0.017%21 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0411%21 Aug
ancient13–6-0.037%21 Aug
mirage13–20.0515%21 Aug
mirage4–13-0.055%21 Aug
anubis15–15-0.0111%21 Aug
cache13–16-0.068%20 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0719%20 Aug
mirage13–6-0.076%20 Aug
dust21–130.0319%20 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0433%19 Aug
anubis7–13-0.046%19 Aug
dust213–80.0722%19 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0318%17 Aug
ancient13–20.0214%17 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →