skip

skip — CS2 Stats

ZA76561198871869906[U:1:911604178]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,029Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,541Hours in CS82Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.3 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating27,308Top 5% of 180,525 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#4296 of 225935 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 17 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

−214Premier CS Rating · 27,522 → 27,308
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 15 days played since 30 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 27,308 +2,306 30 Aug18 Sept · 18 days played
25,00028,252peak 28,25230 Aug18 Sept
28,521Peak Premier in tracked matches
15Days played since 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 944 below peak (28,252)
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 2,692 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches2392−69
Win rate52%51%+1pp
K/D1.331.20+0.13
Headshot %51%52%−1pp

Measured 12 Sep 202618 Sep 2026; previous 3 Sep 2026 → 12 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,413), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate48.1%42.7%43.8%above
Shot accuracy10.4%11.2%12.0%1.6% short
Kill/death ratio1.371.001.02above
Match win rate43.8%43.9%44.7%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGskipFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER27,308 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82
Positioning72
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54424Last 10054%Win rateLWLLLLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −3.1pp headshot accuracy · −33ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 572ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 547ms

Last 20

  • 9101 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 563ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.3 against its own average).

Aim8.2
Utility4.9
Positioning7.2
Opening Duels4.7
Clutch2.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 66% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 66% on T to 45% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 567ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2
Positioning7.2
Utility4.9
Mechanics6.4
Opening Duels6.4
Win Impact6.7

Composite 7.3/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time581ms+42ms
first ⅓ avg 539ms → last ⅓ avg 581ms
Headshot accuracy24.9%+3.7%
first ⅓ avg 21.2% → last ⅓ avg 24.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 13–5 · dust2, 14 Sept
72%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · mirage, 15 Sept
359msFastest reaction time · 9–13 · inferno, 7 Sept
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 11 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
93In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 86% over 7infernoWeakest map · 44% over 25
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA32181456%0.03
infernoC25111444%0.02
dust2B126650%0.05
anubisB115645%0.01
ancientA106460%0.02
nukeS76186%0.05
cache32167%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 25). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

170,241Lifetime kills
1.37K/D · Top 10% of Level 4 players
6,340Matches
43.8%Match win rate
48.1%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 4 players
10.4%Shot accuracy
18,992MVPs
3,514Hours (in match)
5,548Bombs planted
3,214Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4772,125
AWP27,265
P2502,194
SSG 081,948
MP91,712

Lifetime map wins

12,132inferno
9,412dust2
3,657vertigo
3,259train
2,950nuke
328cbble
58lake
30sugarcane

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

4Matches
50%Win rate
1.24Avg K/D
74.9ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
1Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2100%1.4314.0
Ancient10%0.8814.0
Inferno10%1.2426.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.5%Headshot accuracy
34.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.1%Spray accuracy
79.0%Counter-strafing
8.7°Preaim
567msReaction time
66.2%T opening success
44.8%CT opening success
0.39Enemies flashed / flash
7.1%Flash assists
9.48HE damage / grenade
7.68Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3891 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 25 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis5–13-0.0421%18 Sept
inferno13–90.0728%17 Sept
mirage6–13-0.0421%17 Sept
dust28–13-0.0232%17 Sept
dust211–13-0.0225%17 Sept
dust27–130.0630%17 Sept
inferno6–130.0114%17 Sept
dust213–60.0433%17 Sept
mirage13–90.0421%17 Sept
mirage13–40.0324%15 Sept
anubis13–100.0621%15 Sept
inferno7–13-0.0641%15 Sept
mirage13–50.0172%15 Sept
inferno15–150.0426%14 Sept
mirage13–100.0220%14 Sept
dust213–50.2027%14 Sept
inferno10–130.0713%13 Sept
inferno8–130.0313%13 Sept
inferno8–130.0412%13 Sept
cache16–140.0536%13 Sept
mirage10–130.0817%13 Sept
anubis7–3-0.060%13 Sept
nuke6–00.1924%13 Sept
inferno13–70.1149%13 Sept
anubis8–13-0.0418%12 Sept
nuke16–140.0624%11 Sept
dust211–130.0421%11 Sept
ancient13–110.0826%11 Sept
nuke13–70.0625%11 Sept
mirage13–30.0724%11 Sept
nuke6–13-0.0026%11 Sept
inferno7–13-0.0517%11 Sept
mirage13–90.0323%11 Sept
mirage13–00.0817%11 Sept
ancient1–13-0.0436%11 Sept
inferno13–30.0062%11 Sept
anubis13–10-0.0326%11 Sept
inferno13–80.0724%11 Sept
mirage7–130.0622%11 Sept
inferno4–13-0.1116%11 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0323%11 Sept
ancient13–10-0.0424%10 Sept
dust215–15-0.0316%10 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0411%10 Sept
ancient13–8-0.0118%10 Sept
mirage16–130.0716%10 Sept
mirage13–80.1321%9 Sept
nuke13–3-0.0113%9 Sept
dust213–110.0618%9 Sept
inferno16–140.0114%9 Sept
mirage13–90.0922%9 Sept
ancient16–130.0419%9 Sept
mirage13–110.0029%9 Sept
mirage9–13-0.0632%9 Sept
inferno13–2-0.0415%9 Sept
ancient10–130.0115%8 Sept
anubis10–13-0.0116%8 Sept
mirage13–70.0620%8 Sept
nuke13–100.0117%8 Sept
mirage11–130.0922%8 Sept
mirage13–110.0328%8 Sept
cache9–13-0.0316%8 Sept
mirage13–10.0636%8 Sept
inferno6–130.0417%8 Sept
mirage4–13-0.0130%8 Sept
ancient13–80.1422%7 Sept
inferno9–13-0.1018%7 Sept
cache13–10.0634%7 Sept
mirage1–13-0.0810%7 Sept
dust213–40.0922%7 Sept
anubis10–13-0.0112%7 Sept
mirage15–15-0.0417%7 Sept
dust213–110.0415%7 Sept
ancient13–160.0415%6 Sept
inferno13–20.1233%6 Sept
mirage13–60.0315%6 Sept
inferno2–13-0.067%6 Sept
inferno10–130.0229%6 Sept
mirage13–100.1018%6 Sept
anubis13–20.0931%6 Sept
dust213–60.0821%6 Sept
anubis13–90.0021%5 Sept
inferno13–60.0213%5 Sept
ancient13–40.0839%5 Sept
mirage6–13-0.0430%5 Sept
inferno13–100.0927%5 Sept
nuke13–60.0514%5 Sept
inferno13–40.1444%5 Sept
mirage8–130.0215%5 Sept
inferno10–13-0.0114%4 Sept
mirage13–40.0218%4 Sept
anubis15–150.0820%4 Sept
mirage6–13-0.0115%4 Sept
dust29–130.0120%4 Sept
anubis8–130.0125%4 Sept
mirage13–80.0718%4 Sept
inferno13–110.0624%4 Sept
inferno6–130.0039%4 Sept
mirage10–130.0717%3 Sept
ancient3–13-0.086%3 Sept

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →