TMaterial

TMaterial — CS2 Stats

VA76561199040010253[U:1:1079744525]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

693Tracked matches45%Win rate2024Tracked since
1,740Hours in CS31Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.9 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating16,695Purple band · top ~21.7% of ranked players (population est.)
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 24 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 42 days played since 21 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,695 +1,220 5 Aug – 24 Sept · 25 days played
15,30918,139peak 18,1395 Aug24 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,134 +0 30 Aug – 14 Sept · 3 observations
1,1341,134peak 1,13430 Aug14 Sept
18,440Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,134Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
42Days played since 2026-07-21

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,134
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 — 67 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,444 below peak (18,139)
  • -102 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 3,305 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches69——
Win rate46%——
K/D1.06——
Headshot %67%——

Measured 30 Aug 2026 → 26 Sep 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Purple band among CSDB-tracked players (n=37,767), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPurple band medianPink band medianvs Pink band
Headshot rate61.7%44.3%46.9%above
Shot accuracy0.0%11.8%13.0%13.0% short
Kill/death ratio0.801.031.080.28 short
Match win rate34.7%45.2%46.7%11.9% short

This profile matches the typical Pink band player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Pink band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTMaterialPREMIER16,695 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,134csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning73
Utility43

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–44–6Last 10050%Win rateWLWLTLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −8.1pp headshot accuracy · +8ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–2–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 580ms

Last 10

  • 6–3–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 540ms

Last 20

  • 11–8–1 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 31%
  • Avg reaction 536ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim8.7
Utility4.3
Positioning7.3
Opening Duels6.5
Clutch3.8

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 60% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning7.3
Utility4.3
Mechanics8.2
Opening Duels6.3
Win Impact3.3

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time538ms−31ms
first ⅓ avg 569ms → last ⅓ avg 538ms
Headshot accuracy29.6%−0.3%
first ⅓ avg 29.9% → last ⅓ avg 29.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.47Best match rating · 9–0 · inferno, 21 Jul →
69%Best headshot accuracy · 7–13 · inferno, 9 Sept →
375msFastest reaction time · 3–9 · nuke, 12 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · cache, 2 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
13–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
17Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 64% over 14anubisWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB199–1047%0.02
mirageA1810–856%0.00
dust2A1710–759%0.03
nukeA149–564%0.00
ancientB115–645%0.02
cacheD103–730%-0.01
anubisD72–529%0.02
debris—21–150%0.00
vertigo—11–0100%0.02
eldorado—10–10%-0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

76,190Lifetime kills
0.80K/D
2,038Matches
34.7%Match win rate
61.7%Headshot % · Top 5% of Purple band
0.0%Shot accuracy
4,019MVPs
4,100Hours (in match)
1,047Bombs planted
588Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,610inferno
1,702dust2
1,593nuke
227vertigo
150train
74ar_shoots
41ar_baggage
5office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

241Matches
51%Win rate
1.21Avg K/D
80.1ADR
57%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage6647%1.3616.7
Ancient3751%1.1216.9
Dust23759%1.3116.5
Inferno3746%1.1816.0
Anubis2850%1.1214.6
Nuke1839%1.0716.7
Cache1060%1.0216.3
Train475%0.8511.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

29.5%Headshot accuracy
32.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.2%Spray accuracy
87.0%Counter-strafing
8.4°Preaim
539msReaction time
49.9%T opening success
60.4%CT opening success
0.49Enemies flashed / flash
5.2%Flash assists
5.40HE damage / grenade
8.64Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4908 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–40.0226%24 Sept →
dust214–16-0.0523%22 Sept →
mirage13–100.0329%20 Sept →
mirage14–160.0326%19 Sept →
dust212–120.1633%17 Sept →
nuke8–130.0012%17 Sept →
ancient13–80.0430%15 Sept →
mirage13–100.0322%15 Sept →
dust213–60.0343%15 Sept →
nuke13–30.0030%15 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0025%13 Sept →
mirage10–130.0448%13 Sept →
dust29–130.0125%13 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0721%12 Sept →
nuke13–7-0.0523%12 Sept →
anubis13–110.0723%12 Sept →
mirage13–70.0139%11 Sept →
nuke13–10.1252%11 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0369%9 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0128%9 Sept →
cache9–130.0015%9 Sept →
ancient13–110.0530%9 Sept →
dust29–130.0328%6 Sept →
anubis11–130.0436%6 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0025%6 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0231%6 Sept →
mirage13–60.0536%5 Sept →
inferno14–16-0.0131%3 Sept →
ancient5–130.0321%3 Sept →
inferno10–130.0221%2 Sept →
cache12–16-0.0324%2 Sept →
ancient14–16-0.0132%2 Sept →
cache13–00.0423%2 Sept →
mirage15–150.0026%2 Sept →
ancient13–100.0932%1 Sept →
ancient14–16-0.0635%31 Aug →
anubis15–15-0.0331%31 Aug →
inferno8–00.1444%31 Aug →
dust216–140.0337%31 Aug →
mirage13–16-0.0034%30 Aug →
dust213–6-0.0224%29 Aug →
mirage8–2-0.0333%29 Aug →
cache13–11-0.0219%27 Aug →
mirage16–130.0627%23 Aug →
nuke13–60.0236%23 Aug →
mirage16–140.0329%23 Aug →
inferno8–8-0.0831%20 Aug →
nuke9–70.0029%20 Aug →
cache4–13-0.1032%19 Aug →
inferno3–9-0.0719%18 Aug →
dust213–100.0731%18 Aug →
anubis12–16-0.0122%18 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.0624%17 Aug →
cache11–13-0.0032%17 Aug →
dust213–80.0128%17 Aug →
nuke16–12-0.0227%17 Aug →
anubis14–160.0040%15 Aug →
dust213–90.0424%14 Aug →
inferno1–9-0.1820%14 Aug →
inferno7–9-0.0720%13 Aug →
vertigo9–70.0246%12 Aug →
inferno9–30.0519%12 Aug →
inferno9–20.0420%12 Aug →
debris6–90.0132%12 Aug →
nuke6–9-0.0524%12 Aug →
inferno6–9-0.1329%12 Aug →
inferno9–50.0421%12 Aug →
inferno9–40.0823%12 Aug →
nuke3–9-0.1421%12 Aug →
inferno9–70.0921%12 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.0331%10 Aug →
ancient13–16-0.0227%9 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0522%9 Aug →
anubis15–150.0135%9 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.0728%9 Aug →
nuke8–8-0.1015%7 Aug →
inferno9–40.1026%7 Aug →
eldorado6–9-0.1041%7 Aug →
debris9–7-0.0123%6 Aug →
nuke8–130.0150%5 Aug →
inferno13–20.0023%5 Aug →
ancient13–90.1337%5 Aug →
mirage7–10.0325%5 Aug →
mirage13–30.0422%4 Aug →
inferno4–13-0.0442%4 Aug →
nuke13–110.1131%4 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0536%4 Aug →
cache13–7-0.0021%1 Aug →
dust213–70.0725%31 Jul →
dust213–10-0.0330%29 Jul →
dust22–130.0748%29 Jul →
inferno3–90.0121%26 Jul →
ancient9–13-0.0326%25 Jul →
anubis13–40.0325%25 Jul →
cache11–130.0133%24 Jul →
dust213–10.1352%24 Jul →
dust210–13-0.0134%22 Jul →
nuke9–70.0919%21 Jul →
inferno9–00.4750%21 Jul →
dust213–60.0723%21 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →