H3NSU

H3NSU — CS2 Stats

CX76561199032323907[U:1:1072058179]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,579Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,032Hours in CS18Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating19,318Top 50% of 211,827 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~11.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#94920 of 258690 tracked
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,228 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 21 Oct 2026 (9 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,318 -466 30 Aug – 21 Oct · 29 days played
16,44919,784peak 19,78430 Aug21 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,228 +0 30 Aug – 3 Sept · 4 observations
1,2281,228peak 1,22830 Aug3 Sept
19,784Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,228Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
25Days played since 2026-08-30

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,228
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 — 123 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 466 below peak (19,784)
  • +2,869 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 682 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,496), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate47.9%44.8%45.7%above
Shot accuracy5.4%12.4%12.7%7.3% short
Kill/death ratio0.861.031.050.19 short
Match win rate44.6%45.2%45.7%1.1% short

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGH3NSUFACEITLevel 6 · 1,228 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER19,318 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,228csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim60
Positioning54
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56–41–3Last 10056%Win rateWWWWLWLTWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −0.7pp headshot accuracy · −23ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 574ms

Last 10

  • 6–3–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 605ms

Last 20

  • 12–7–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 616ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim6.0
Utility4.8
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels2.3
Clutch4.0

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 618ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.0
Positioning5.4
Utility4.8
Mechanics4.5
Opening Duels3.2
Win Impact7.9

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time624ms+18ms
first ⅓ avg 606ms → last ⅓ avg 624ms
Headshot accuracy20.2%−1.8%
first ⅓ avg 21.9% → last ⅓ avg 20.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–3 · cache, 15 Oct →
45%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · anubis, 11 Oct →
391msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · vertigo, 27 Sept →
13–2Biggest win · anubis, 9 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W4Current streak
9–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 67% over 6dust2Weakest map · 53% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2816–1257%-0.01
dust2B158–753%0.00
nukeA138–562%0.01
cacheB137–654%0.00
infernoA127–558%-0.01
anubisA116–555%-0.01
ancientS64–267%0.01
vertigo—20–20%-0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (53% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

64,079Lifetime kills
0.86K/D
4,082Matches
44.6%Match win rate
47.9%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 6 players
5.4%Shot accuracy
8,752MVPs
1,559Hours (in match)
2,450Bombs planted
833Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4724,984
AWP3,069
MP92,439
MAC-101,642
MP7827

Lifetime map wins

7,134nuke
6,017inferno
2,579dust2
2,361vertigo
738train
423cbble
61office
28lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

206Matches
50%Win rate
1.05Avg K/D
81.5ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage6057%1.0215.8
Nuke2861%1.5416.6
Anubis2339%1.0215.3
Inferno2148%1.0217.4
Dust21937%0.9314.4
Vertigo1878%1.2117.8
Ancient1553%1.0416.3
Train40%0.6211.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.0%Headshot accuracy
34.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.9%Spray accuracy
70.4%Counter-strafing
10.8°Preaim
618msReaction time
34.0%T opening success
51.6%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
9.3%Flash assists
6.70HE damage / grenade
4.02Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.0291% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–80.0615%21 Oct →
nuke13–8-0.0023%21 Oct →
mirage13–110.0422%20 Oct →
ancient13–30.068%20 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0720%20 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0221%19 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0233%19 Oct →
mirage15–150.0012%18 Oct →
ancient13–5-0.0718%18 Oct →
mirage0–13-0.0110%18 Oct →
cache13–8-0.0417%18 Oct →
nuke13–70.0518%18 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.0417%17 Oct →
cache13–100.0226%17 Oct →
inferno13–40.0227%17 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.0311%16 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0126%16 Oct →
cache4–13-0.0314%16 Oct →
nuke10–130.0219%16 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0013%15 Oct →
cache13–30.1317%15 Oct →
dust213–100.0825%15 Oct →
inferno10–130.0014%15 Oct →
mirage9–130.0020%15 Oct →
dust25–130.0835%15 Oct →
ancient13–100.0521%14 Oct →
cache13–110.0433%14 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0219%14 Oct →
dust213–10-0.0022%14 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.0214%13 Oct →
ancient13–80.0620%13 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.0544%13 Oct →
mirage13–100.0313%12 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.0321%12 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0814%11 Oct →
anubis13–5-0.0345%11 Oct →
inferno13–3-0.0029%11 Oct →
mirage13–90.0329%10 Oct →
anubis13–60.0831%10 Oct →
anubis13–20.0320%9 Oct →
cache10–13-0.0213%9 Oct →
anubis13–90.0719%8 Oct →
anubis15–15-0.0411%8 Oct →
mirage13–30.0223%8 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0511%8 Oct →
nuke14–160.0124%7 Oct →
dust22–13-0.090%7 Oct →
nuke4–13-0.0424%7 Oct →
nuke13–80.0019%7 Oct →
nuke13–50.0519%7 Oct →
inferno4–12-0.0131%7 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0520%7 Oct →
cache8–130.0518%6 Oct →
dust23–13-0.0621%6 Oct →
inferno13–30.0714%6 Oct →
inferno15–15-0.0312%6 Oct →
cache3–13-0.090%6 Oct →
cache6–13-0.0638%6 Oct →
mirage13–100.0220%5 Oct →
mirage13–90.0125%5 Oct →
mirage13–110.0124%5 Oct →
anubis2–13-0.0643%5 Oct →
dust213–4-0.0610%5 Oct →
inferno10–8-0.0325%5 Oct →
dust23–13-0.0611%5 Oct →
dust22–130.0335%4 Oct →
dust213–70.0832%4 Oct →
anubis7–12-0.0729%4 Oct →
cache13–110.0132%1 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0225%1 Oct →
mirage13–80.0120%1 Oct →
dust213–9-0.0218%1 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0519%30 Sept →
mirage13–70.0128%30 Sept →
nuke13–60.0128%30 Sept →
cache13–100.0627%30 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.0421%30 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0119%30 Sept →
dust212–16-0.0022%30 Sept →
dust213–11-0.1313%29 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.0319%29 Sept →
dust213–100.0328%29 Sept →
nuke3–13-0.0016%29 Sept →
mirage0–13-0.090%29 Sept →
dust28–130.0926%29 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.0315%29 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0225%28 Sept →
mirage13–6-0.0726%28 Sept →
nuke13–50.0324%28 Sept →
vertigo7–13-0.1020%27 Sept →
vertigo11–13-0.0527%27 Sept →
cache12–160.0123%27 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.0612%27 Sept →
inferno13–50.0022%27 Sept →
dust213–90.0325%27 Sept →
cache13–9-0.0319%26 Sept →
nuke13–90.0428%26 Sept →
inferno12–16-0.0026%25 Sept →
mirage13–20.0420%25 Sept →
mirage14–160.0523%25 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.