0SAMAS — CS2 Stats

PROJiJieHaoPalestineRiflerSettings & gear profile →

76561199024583803[U:1:1064318075]

4,708Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidPassive Rifler
CSDB Leaderboard#5530 of 6801 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 3,444 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 3,444 +0 27 Aug28 Aug · 2 observations
3,4443,444peak 3,44427 Aug28 Aug
3,444Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB
2Days observed since 2026-08-27

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 3,444
  • Next: 3,500 ELO at 3,500 56 to go
  • Reached: 3,000 ELO · 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9
  • 3,000 ELO first seen 2026-08-28
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG0SAMASFACEITLevel 10 · 3,444 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO3,444csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning54
Utility65

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY57403Last 10057%Win rateWWLLLLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.0
Aggression3.2
Utility6.5
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels1.6
Clutch3.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 21% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning5.4
Utility6.5
Mechanics6.0
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time459ms−93ms
first ⅓ avg 552ms → last ⅓ avg 459ms
Headshot accuracy21.5%−0.5%
first ⅓ avg 22.1% → last ⅓ avg 21.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.24Best rating — dust2 13–9
131Biggest win — inferno
7Longest win streak
W2Current streak
89In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 79% over 14anubisWeakest map · 36% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A25151060%0.03
mirageB21101148%0.02
ancientA1911858%-0.00
infernoS1411379%0.02
anubisC114736%0.01
cache43175%0.01
overpass32167%0.01
office21150%-0.09
nuke1010%-0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

6,345Matches
56%Win rate
1.30Avg K/D
93.3ADR
53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
28%1v2 clutch win
18Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage86559%1.3719.8
Ancient77156%1.3619.3
Dust262964%1.4019.0
Anubis47860%1.3419.1
Nuke32356%1.3719.2
Vertigo16352%1.3219.6
Inferno15162%1.3518.6
Overpass8361%1.3319.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Inventory

$4,625Inventory value80ItemsFull inventory breakdown →
★ M9 Bayonet | Gamma Doppler (Minimal Wear)$1,609★ Sport Gloves | Ultra Violent (Field-Tested)$1,573M4A1-S | Fade (Factory New)$326AK-47 | The Oligarch (Minimal Wear)$161M4A1-S | Golden Coil (Minimal Wear)$136Glock-18 | Gamma Doppler (Minimal Wear)$131

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.6%Headshot accuracy
35.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.7%Spray accuracy
77.2%Counter-strafing
10.9°Preaim
458msReaction time
20.7%T opening success
51.7%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
5.6%Flash assists
8.39HE damage / grenade
9.35Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 20.7385% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–90.1824%20 Aug
inferno13–50.1125%19 Aug
anubis4–13-0.0829%15 Aug
mirage4–7-0.0517%15 Aug
mirage1–7-0.0533%15 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0411%13 Aug
dust23–13-0.0625%13 Aug
mirage13–100.0021%12 Aug
anubis10–130.0331%10 Aug
dust213–11-0.0526%9 Aug
cache13–9-0.0113%9 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0321%9 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0127%9 Aug
anubis13–110.0719%9 Aug
ancient13–6-0.067%9 Aug
inferno16–140.0521%9 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0119%9 Aug
cache9–13-0.0121%9 Aug
dust213–20.0720%8 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0620%8 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0118%8 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0119%8 Aug
dust211–13-0.0125%8 Aug
inferno13–10.0120%7 Aug
mirage13–10.0431%7 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0417%1 Aug
dust28–13-0.0636%1 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0322%1 Aug
dust213–90.2420%31 Jul
cache13–80.0116%30 Jul
ancient28–26-0.0321%30 Jul
mirage8–13-0.069%27 Jul
ancient16–140.0326%19 Jul
dust213–90.0417%12 Jul
mirage12–120.1634%12 Jul
office5–13-0.1110%12 Jul
office4–1-0.060%11 Jul
mirage13–80.0222%9 Jul
dust27–130.0415%30 Jun
ancient14–16-0.0124%18 Jun
overpass11–130.0326%18 Jun
cache13–90.0617%15 Jun
dust212–120.1220%14 Jun
dust212–120.0428%31 May
inferno9–13-0.0324%24 May
mirage17–19-0.0320%24 May
anubis13–20.0327%24 May
inferno16–120.0225%24 May
inferno13–30.1024%23 May
ancient13–50.0331%23 May
ancient6–130.0321%17 May
inferno13–9-0.0130%17 May
dust224–280.0120%17 May
anubis10–13-0.0120%17 May
inferno16–13-0.0128%16 May
ancient13–60.0333%16 May
inferno13–20.0229%13 May
ancient10–130.0027%12 May
dust29–13-0.0516%12 May
mirage13–40.0435%12 May
ancient16–13-0.0216%12 May
dust213–70.0529%11 May
mirage13–11-0.0319%11 May
nuke3–13-0.0724%11 May
mirage7–130.1216%9 May
dust213–20.0434%9 May
dust213–60.1348%8 May
mirage13–80.0925%6 May
anubis13–60.0224%3 May
mirage13–3-0.0021%3 May
ancient8–13-0.0534%2 May
anubis8–13-0.0126%2 May
dust213–9-0.0143%1 May
ancient13–8-0.0323%1 May
mirage11–13-0.0224%1 May
dust213–1-0.0119%30 Apr
dust213–50.0516%24 Apr
overpass13–110.0425%24 Apr
inferno13–10.0427%23 Apr
ancient13–60.0517%23 Apr
anubis13–90.0626%22 Apr
dust213–40.1316%13 Apr
anubis6–130.1023%12 Apr
inferno13–5-0.0221%11 Apr
dust25–13-0.0419%9 Apr
mirage6–130.0415%6 Apr
mirage13–50.0513%6 Apr
anubis3–13-0.0715%1 Apr
ancient14–160.0018%29 Mar
ancient9–13-0.0114%29 Mar
ancient13–50.0916%29 Mar
mirage11–13-0.0127%25 Mar
inferno13–90.1024%22 Mar
dust213–10.0532%21 Mar
dust213–100.0833%21 Mar
overpass13–11-0.0420%20 Mar
mirage5–13-0.0414%16 Mar
dust28–130.0122%14 Mar
dust213–7-0.0219%12 Mar
dust213–6-0.0019%12 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 103K ELO Club1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →