TeSeS On Fire

TeSeS On Fire — CS2 Stats

MY76561199018277981[U:1:1058012253]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,285Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,717Hours in CS44Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating23,821Top 25% of 215,386 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#34882 of 261639 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,607 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Nov 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,821 +2,328 20 Sept – 14 Nov · 10 days played
21,49324,533peak 24,53320 Sept14 Nov
Faceit ELO: 1,607 +0 20 Sept – 24 Oct · 4 observations
1,6071,607peak 1,60720 Sept24 Oct
24,533Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,607Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
23Days played since 2026-09-20

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,607
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 144 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-20
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-20

Premier CS Rating

  • 712 below peak (24,533)
  • -712 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 1,179 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-20
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-20

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches8098−18
Win rate48%57%−10pp
K/D0.911.05−0.14
Headshot %45%47%−2pp

Measured 17 Oct 2026 → 15 Nov 2026; previous 20 Sep 2026 → 17 Oct 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,132), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate44.1%48.2%50.9%6.8% short
Shot accuracy11.5%13.2%13.7%2.2% short
Kill/death ratio1.061.071.090.02 short
Match win rate45.3%46.9%48.4%3.1% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 10 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTeSeS On FireFACEITLevel 9 · 1,607 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER23,821 · Pink band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,607csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning49
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53–47Last 10053%Win rateWWWLLWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +1.0pp headshot accuracy · −38ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 537ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 512ms

Last 20

  • 13–7 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 530ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim6.8
Utility5.0
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch3.8

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning4.9
Utility5.0
Mechanics4.8
Opening Duels1.2
Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time532ms−13ms
first ⅓ avg 545ms → last ⅓ avg 532ms
Headshot accuracy19.3%+1.0%
first ⅓ avg 18.4% → last ⅓ avg 19.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–7 · mirage, 1 Nov →
36%Best headshot accuracy · 2–13 · nuke, 9 Oct →
367msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · mirage, 9 Nov →
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 4 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W3Current streak
15–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 72% over 18anubisWeakest map · 36% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA2716–1159%0.04
mirageB2210–1245%0.01
ancientS1813–572%0.02
anubisC114–736%-0.02
dust2C104–640%-0.01
cacheA53–260%0.00
rush_001—43–175%0.06
nuke—20–20%-0.03
vertigo—10–10%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

92,506Lifetime kills
1.06K/D
5,212Matches
45.3%Match win rate
44.1%Headshot %
11.5%Shot accuracy
10,337MVPs
1,927Hours (in match)
5,952Bombs planted
1,744Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4729,625
AWP11,799
MP92,574
Tec-92,440
MAC-102,285

Lifetime map wins

11,572inferno
9,128dust2
1,776vertigo
1,693nuke
649train
141office
76cbble
42militia

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

810Matches
50%Win rate
1.13Avg K/D
76.7ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage25945%1.1015.4
Inferno15654%1.3117.3
Dust213350%1.0314.8
Ancient9156%1.1117.1
Anubis6949%1.1315.6
Nuke4144%1.0115.0
Cache2662%1.0816.6
Vertigo875%1.3914.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.4%Headshot accuracy
33.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.4%Spray accuracy
71.7%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
534msReaction time
39.3%T opening success
28.0%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
5.8%Flash assists
10.22HE damage / grenade
4.63Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.3275% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–7-0.0416%14 Nov →
anubis13–110.0223%14 Nov →
cache13–50.0336%14 Nov →
inferno11–130.0521%14 Nov →
mirage11–130.0225%14 Nov →
anubis13–8-0.0122%14 Nov →
inferno11–13-0.0518%14 Nov →
inferno13–60.1028%14 Nov →
inferno13–110.0216%13 Nov →
inferno14–160.0118%13 Nov →
dust25–13-0.0329%13 Nov →
ancient13–9-0.016%13 Nov →
anubis0–13-0.0530%13 Nov →
inferno13–100.0216%12 Nov →
inferno13–30.0414%12 Nov →
ancient13–110.0730%12 Nov →
cache16–14-0.0216%12 Nov →
dust213–9-0.0133%12 Nov →
mirage10–13-0.0327%11 Nov →
dust213–11-0.0411%11 Nov →
mirage13–70.0413%10 Nov →
dust214–16-0.0511%10 Nov →
mirage8–13-0.1018%10 Nov →
inferno13–110.1318%10 Nov →
ancient16–140.0313%9 Nov →
ancient7–13-0.059%9 Nov →
mirage7–13-0.0111%9 Nov →
vertigo4–130.0214%8 Nov →
ancient11–13-0.0215%8 Nov →
mirage16–190.0331%8 Nov →
dust210–13-0.0323%8 Nov →
inferno13–60.0910%7 Nov →
dust210–13-0.0417%7 Nov →
mirage13–110.0422%7 Nov →
anubis3–13-0.0324%7 Nov →
ancient16–140.0118%7 Nov →
ancient13–10-0.058%6 Nov →
inferno10–130.0611%6 Nov →
mirage2–13-0.0415%6 Nov →
anubis7–13-0.0119%6 Nov →
anubis13–11-0.027%6 Nov →
ancient16–120.0615%6 Nov →
ancient19–15-0.0124%5 Nov →
inferno9–130.1028%4 Nov →
ancient13–7-0.0112%4 Nov →
dust25–13-0.0112%4 Nov →
inferno13–9-0.0115%3 Nov →
ancient13–160.1119%3 Nov →
nuke6–13-0.0320%3 Nov →
ancient6–13-0.0219%3 Nov →
cache3–13-0.0017%3 Nov →
dust213–60.0620%3 Nov →
mirage5–13-0.0221%2 Nov →
dust213–50.0518%2 Nov →
mirage13–70.1622%1 Nov →
mirage13–50.0717%1 Nov →
inferno13–50.0115%1 Nov →
mirage6–13-0.0715%1 Nov →
mirage16–12-0.0117%31 Oct →
mirage13–4-0.0017%31 Oct →
anubis13–100.0616%31 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0123%31 Oct →
ancient13–110.0414%31 Oct →
mirage13–60.1321%31 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.0617%31 Oct →
rush_0018–7-0.058%31 Oct →
rush_0015–80.0914%31 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.0212%28 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0612%28 Oct →
anubis9–13-0.076%28 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.046%28 Oct →
ancient13–8-0.0521%10 Oct →
inferno7–13-0.0615%10 Oct →
inferno6–130.0311%10 Oct →
mirage7–130.0021%10 Oct →
inferno13–30.0812%10 Oct →
inferno25–220.0431%10 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0523%10 Oct →
inferno6–130.0723%10 Oct →
mirage8–130.0116%9 Oct →
nuke2–13-0.0336%9 Oct →
inferno13–40.0922%8 Oct →
inferno13–110.0315%8 Oct →
ancient13–50.1320%7 Oct →
inferno8–130.0118%7 Oct →
rush_0018–50.0836%7 Oct →
rush_0016–20.1319%7 Oct →
inferno13–30.0719%6 Oct →
inferno13–100.0516%5 Oct →
inferno13–110.0918%5 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.012%5 Oct →
mirage16–13-0.0125%4 Oct →
mirage5–130.0316%4 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.0114%4 Oct →
ancient13–10.1418%4 Oct →
mirage13–110.0012%4 Oct →
cache13–80.0033%4 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0311%4 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0619%4 Oct →
inferno13–90.0429%4 Oct →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.