b4sheed

b4sheed — CS2 Stats

DE76561199017235771[U:1:1056970043]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,118Tracked matches41%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,801Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating19,317Top 50% of 212,695 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~11.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#95308 of 259582 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,369 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 2 Nov 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,317 +111 23 Aug – 2 Nov · 31 days played
18,57520,442peak 20,44223 Aug2 Nov
20,807Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,369Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
45Days played since 2026-08-23

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,369
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 162 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,125 below peak (20,442)
  • +171 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 683 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,132), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate58.0%48.2%50.9%above
Shot accuracy8.3%13.2%13.7%5.4% short
Kill/death ratio0.911.071.090.18 short
Match win rate44.4%46.9%48.4%3.9% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGb4sheedFACEITLevel 9 · 1,369 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER19,317 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,369csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning60
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51–44–5Last 10051%Win rateLWLLWLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +0.4pp headshot accuracy · +115ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 642ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 630ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 572ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim8.0
Utility5.7
Positioning6.0
Opening Duels4.7
Clutch3.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 565ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning6.0
Utility5.7
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels6.1
Win Impact2.1

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time581ms−26ms
first ⅓ avg 607ms → last ⅓ avg 581ms
Headshot accuracy24.5%−1.8%
first ⅓ avg 26.3% → last ⅓ avg 24.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 9–1 · nuke, 17 Sept →
100%Best headshot accuracy · 0–9 · poseidon, 18 Sept →
422msFastest reaction time · 13–8 · inferno, 20 Oct →
13–3Biggest win · anubis, 2 Nov →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
11–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 71% over 17nukeWeakest map · 31% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C208–1240%-0.00
anubisS1712–571%0.01
mirageB158–753%-0.01
nukeD134–931%0.02
infernoA116–555%0.01
ancientA106–460%-0.01
cacheD93–633%-0.02
vertigo—22–0100%0.06
office—11–0100%-0.02
poseidon—10–10%-0.21
overpass—11–0100%0.16

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

54,105Lifetime kills
0.91K/D
2,657Matches
44.4%Match win rate
58.0%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 9 players
8.3%Shot accuracy
6,276MVPs
1,801Hours (in match)
2,245Bombs planted
601Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4721,136
AWP4,673
MP91,316
MAC-101,147
FAMAS1,143

Lifetime map wins

5,541dust2
3,395inferno
2,031nuke
848train
702vertigo
455office
440cbble
149lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

293Matches
53%Win rate
1.10Avg K/D
80.0ADR
56%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust28656%1.1316.7
Mirage7642%1.0115.3
Ancient3650%1.1116.0
Anubis3053%1.0716.7
Inferno2846%1.1415.9
Nuke1493%1.2019.1
Cache1173%1.0015.6
Overpass771%1.6218.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.2%Headshot accuracy
34.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.9%Spray accuracy
81.2%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
565msReaction time
52.2%T opening success
56.3%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
7.2%Flash assists
9.37HE damage / grenade
10.63Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache5–13-0.0627%2 Nov →
anubis13–30.0320%2 Nov →
dust210–13-0.0917%2 Nov →
nuke1–5-0.1333%31 Oct →
office13–10-0.0239%31 Oct →
cache10–130.0123%30 Oct →
nuke14–160.0221%28 Oct →
anubis16–140.0215%28 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0233%28 Oct →
nuke11–130.1326%27 Oct →
anubis13–11-0.0320%27 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0023%26 Oct →
anubis6–130.0121%26 Oct →
dust213–4-0.0121%23 Oct →
nuke14–16-0.0117%22 Oct →
dust213–110.0331%22 Oct →
dust214–160.0434%21 Oct →
nuke9–130.0029%20 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0034%20 Oct →
inferno13–80.0320%20 Oct →
dust28–130.0424%19 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.0140%19 Oct →
anubis13–70.0321%19 Oct →
mirage2–13-0.0415%19 Oct →
mirage13–60.0721%19 Oct →
anubis13–90.0714%19 Oct →
mirage13–110.0321%18 Oct →
dust22–13-0.0816%18 Oct →
dust28–130.0423%18 Oct →
anubis15–150.0428%18 Oct →
dust213–90.0027%18 Oct →
inferno14–160.0225%16 Oct →
dust213–7-0.0427%15 Oct →
dust210–130.0328%15 Oct →
dust23–13-0.0144%15 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0421%15 Oct →
nuke13–8-0.0429%15 Oct →
mirage13–90.0421%14 Oct →
dust213–100.0329%14 Oct →
cache15–15-0.0413%13 Oct →
anubis13–4-0.049%13 Oct →
ancient13–80.0327%13 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0235%13 Oct →
nuke13–9-0.0337%13 Oct →
ancient8–130.0324%13 Oct →
dust211–130.0328%13 Oct →
cache13–80.0933%12 Oct →
anubis13–11-0.0217%12 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0727%11 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0714%10 Oct →
anubis13–50.0420%10 Oct →
cache6–13-0.0533%10 Oct →
mirage9–130.0123%10 Oct →
anubis2–13-0.0624%10 Oct →
mirage13–6-0.0134%9 Oct →
dust213–5-0.0127%9 Oct →
mirage13–7-0.0218%8 Oct →
anubis16–12-0.0211%8 Oct →
ancient14–16-0.0620%5 Oct →
inferno13–100.0118%3 Oct →
ancient13–80.0613%30 Sept →
inferno11–130.0120%30 Sept →
anubis8–130.0528%29 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0516%29 Sept →
inferno13–80.0319%28 Sept →
inferno13–90.0418%28 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0221%27 Sept →
anubis13–100.0722%27 Sept →
cache16–13-0.0513%25 Sept →
cache4–13-0.0526%23 Sept →
dust215–150.0136%21 Sept →
cache5–130.0333%19 Sept →
inferno5–9-0.1220%18 Sept →
inferno9–50.1823%18 Sept →
poseidon0–9-0.21100%18 Sept →
vertigo9–40.0617%18 Sept →
vertigo9–60.0630%17 Sept →
nuke7–90.0732%17 Sept →
overpass9–50.1629%17 Sept →
nuke9–60.0624%17 Sept →
nuke9–10.2036%17 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.0413%15 Sept →
ancient22–18-0.0018%12 Sept →
inferno15–15-0.0616%11 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0121%11 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0623%10 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.0112%8 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0319%8 Sept →
dust20–9-0.0347%7 Sept →
dust215–15-0.0414%29 Aug →
anubis5–13-0.0329%29 Aug →
ancient16–12-0.0317%27 Aug →
ancient10–4-0.0356%27 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0323%26 Aug →
anubis13–11-0.0024%26 Aug →
nuke11–130.0119%26 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0215%25 Aug →
dust213–40.0222%24 Aug →
mirage8–130.0115%24 Aug →
ancient13–90.0924%23 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.