laidback

laidback — CS2 Stats

AU76561199016618393[U:1:1056352665]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

543Tracked matches47%Win rate2023Tracked since
248Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating16,877Purple band · top ~20.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#8695 of 14734 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Pink band among CSDB-tracked players (n=201), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPink band medianvs Pink band
Headshot rate45.5%48.1%2.6% short
Shot accuracy9.7%12.9%3.1% short
Kill/death ratio1.071.08meets
Match win rate43.0%46.5%3.5% short

This profile matches the typical Pink band player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Pink band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGlaidbackPREMIER16,877 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning53
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52462Last 10052%Win rateLWLWLWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.1
Aggression4.1
Utility4.9
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels1.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 43% on CT to 25% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning5.3
Utility4.9
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels1.6
Win Impact3.9

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time539ms−86ms
first ⅓ avg 625ms → last ⅓ avg 539ms
Headshot accuracy19.0%+2.1%
first ⅓ avg 16.9% → last ⅓ avg 19.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — mirage 13–8
132Biggest win — anubis
6Longest win streak
76In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 70% over 10dust2Weakest map · 35% over 26
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C2691735%0.00
mirageA1912763%-0.00
ancientC146843%-0.01
cacheS128467%0.01
nukeA127558%-0.02
anubisS107370%0.00
infernoC73443%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (35% over 26). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

12,705Lifetime kills
1.07K/D · Top 50% of tracked players
812Matches
43.0%Match win rate
45.5%Headshot %
9.7%Shot accuracy
1,394MVPs
248Hours (in match)
452Bombs planted
163Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,662dust2
483inferno
444nuke
113lake
95office
79vertigo
66cbble
53italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.0%Headshot accuracy
37.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.4%Spray accuracy
83.8%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
536msReaction time
24.7%T opening success
43.1%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
4.8%Flash assists
5.38HE damage / grenade
16.88Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.7278% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

35% win rate across 26 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust28–130.0219%28 Aug
cache13–90.0315%26 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0413%26 Aug
mirage16–12-0.0521%24 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0125%22 Aug
ancient13–60.0218%22 Aug
mirage8–130.0132%22 Aug
dust26–13-0.0131%22 Aug
dust25–130.0312%22 Aug
anubis13–60.0217%22 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0315%21 Aug
anubis16–140.0224%21 Aug
cache13–70.1224%21 Aug
dust213–40.0416%21 Aug
ancient9–130.0028%21 Aug
dust25–130.0014%21 Aug
inferno13–110.0118%21 Aug
dust27–130.0326%21 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0324%20 Aug
cache8–13-0.0118%19 Aug
dust212–16-0.0515%17 Aug
cache6–13-0.0623%17 Aug
mirage16–12-0.0117%17 Aug
anubis5–13-0.1020%17 Aug
cache13–110.0012%17 Aug
ancient13–9-0.089%17 Aug
dust213–6-0.0115%17 Aug
nuke13–5-0.0024%17 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0220%16 Aug
ancient12–16-0.0313%16 Aug
dust215–15-0.0321%16 Aug
mirage14–160.0013%16 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0119%16 Aug
cache13–4-0.0012%16 Aug
cache11–130.0420%16 Aug
mirage13–110.0015%15 Aug
ancient13–70.0117%14 Aug
mirage16–12-0.055%14 Aug
dust24–13-0.034%13 Aug
anubis3–13-0.029%13 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0222%13 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0318%13 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0635%13 Aug
inferno13–40.0115%13 Aug
nuke2–13-0.0328%13 Aug
mirage13–60.1130%13 Aug
dust25–13-0.0416%12 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0230%12 Aug
cache13–7-0.0119%12 Aug
dust28–13-0.0218%9 Aug
mirage12–16-0.059%6 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0816%6 Aug
ancient13–60.0516%6 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0320%4 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0923%4 Aug
dust26–13-0.0116%4 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0316%3 Aug
mirage16–130.0115%3 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0624%2 Aug
nuke13–50.0421%2 Aug
dust28–130.0212%2 Aug
anubis13–6-0.0211%31 Jul
nuke13–7-0.0314%31 Jul
mirage13–80.1222%31 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0023%31 Jul
inferno11–13-0.048%31 Jul
dust213–90.0114%31 Jul
ancient16–12-0.0611%30 Jul
anubis13–90.0215%30 Jul
nuke16–140.0219%30 Jul
dust27–13-0.0014%29 Jul
mirage13–50.066%29 Jul
cache13–6-0.019%29 Jul
dust213–8-0.0615%28 Jul
anubis13–90.0521%28 Jul
inferno13–80.0118%28 Jul
mirage9–130.0118%28 Jul
nuke13–80.0014%28 Jul
mirage13–10-0.039%27 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0813%27 Jul
dust213–60.0021%27 Jul
ancient13–80.0119%27 Jul
cache9–13-0.0627%26 Jul
ancient15–150.0413%26 Jul
anubis13–20.098%26 Jul
mirage13–50.0425%26 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0518%26 Jul
anubis8–2-0.028%26 Jul
dust25–130.0519%26 Jul
dust213–60.0735%26 Jul
dust213–80.0919%25 Jul
dust213–70.0420%25 Jul
dust213–20.0526%25 Jul
cache13–100.0820%25 Jul
nuke16–130.0114%19 Jul
dust25–13-0.0424%19 Jul
dust211–13-0.0512%18 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0411%17 Jul
dust26–13-0.0620%17 Jul
cache16–140.0316%17 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →