Ghost — CS2 Stats

76561199013727134[U:1:1053461406]Steam profile ↗

1,862Tracked matches62%Win rate2020Tracked since

2,359Hours in CS

CSDB Rating6.9 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating18,753Purple band · top ~13.5% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#15917 of 33716 tracked

FaceitLevel 8 · 1,496 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanGold Nova I

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,146), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 8 median	Level 9 median	vs Level 9
Headshot rate	63.0%	47.2%	49.0%	above
Shot accuracy	12.2%	12.3%	13.1%	0.9% short
Kill/death ratio	1.54	1.07	1.08	above
Match win rate	39.9%	46.3%	46.9%	7.0% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89

Positioning65

Utility37

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT57–42–1Last 10057%Win rateLWWWWLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.9

Aggression9.3

Utility3.7

Positioning6.5

Opening Duels5.1

Clutch4.2

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like sh1ro 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 65% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 65% on CT to 36% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 552ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9

Positioning6.5

Utility3.7

Mechanics6.7

Opening Duels5.1

Win Impact9.0

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00

Reaction time557ms−2ms

first ⅓ avg 559ms → last ⅓ avg 557ms

Headshot accuracy18.8%−3.5%

first ⅓ avg 22.3% → last ⅓ avg 18.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — mirage 13–11

13–3Biggest win — ancient

7Longest win streak

9–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

13Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 72% over 18dust2Weakest map · 33% over 9

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	A	21	12–9	57%	0.02
anubis	S	18	13–5	72%	0.02
inferno	S	16	11–5	69%	0.01
ancient	B	13	7–6	54%	-0.01
cache	B	13	6–7	46%	-0.02
dust2	D	9	3–6	33%	-0.00
nuke	B	8	4–4	50%	0.00
vertigo	—	1	0–1	0%	0.00
overpass	—	1	1–0	100%	0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

189,016Lifetime kills

1.54K/D · Top 10% of Level 8 players

3,582Matches

39.9%Match win rate

63.0%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 8 players

12.2%Shot accuracy

7,998MVPs

2,359Hours (in match)

1,319Bombs planted

1,074Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-47103,503

AWP31,960

M4A4 / M4A1-S11,831

P2000 / USP-S11,102

Desert Eagle10,040

Glock-184,491

FAMAS2,901

Galil AR2,416

P2501,842

Knife1,365

Lifetime map wins

9,863inferno

3,127nuke

2,627vertigo

1,191dust2

795train

20office

12cbble

10ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,198Matches

50%Win rate

1.16Avg K/D

80.9ADR

36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win

20%1v2 clutch win

8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	192	48%	1.12	17.0
Inferno	145	56%	1.16	16.9
Ancient	62	50%	1.14	16.7
Nuke	52	58%	1.31	17.7
Anubis	43	53%	1.04	16.6
Dust2	26	38%	0.92	14.9
Vertigo	23	26%	0.84	14.0
Overpass	23	78%	1.25	16.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.4%Headshot accuracy

41.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

43.5%Spray accuracy

80.3%Counter-strafing

7.1°Preaim

552msReaction time

36.2%T opening success

64.9%CT opening success

0.56Enemies flashed / flash

3.8%Flash assists

9.04HE damage / grenade

2.54Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.
Flashes per match 2.5431 — below the 4 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 36.1886% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	7–13	-0.07	6%	27 Aug →
ancient	13–3	0.12	8%	27 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.02	17%	27 Aug →
nuke	13–7	0.03	22%	27 Aug →
inferno	13–6	0.04	18%	27 Aug →
nuke	7–13	-0.01	14%	27 Aug →
mirage	4–13	0.10	22%	27 Aug →
anubis	13–9	0.02	21%	26 Aug →
nuke	13–11	-0.02	16%	26 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.05	24%	26 Aug →
dust2	3–13	-0.02	19%	20 Aug →
inferno	16–13	0.03	13%	20 Aug →
ancient	9–13	-0.07	24%	19 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.05	25%	19 Aug →
vertigo	11–13	0.00	19%	19 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.00	27%	17 Aug →
inferno	16–13	0.04	12%	17 Aug →
cache	13–16	-0.06	17%	17 Aug →
dust2	5–13	0.01	17%	17 Aug →
inferno	6–13	-0.06	20%	17 Aug →
anubis	13–6	0.06	18%	17 Aug →
cache	13–8	-0.02	6%	17 Aug →
nuke	5–13	-0.02	23%	17 Aug →
cache	11–13	-0.02	20%	17 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.02	15%	17 Aug →
inferno	15–15	-0.02	19%	17 Aug →
ancient	13–11	-0.06	12%	17 Aug →
anubis	13–7	0.00	23%	17 Aug →
mirage	13–7	-0.01	23%	17 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.01	34%	16 Aug →
cache	8–13	0.01	26%	16 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.01	17%	9 Aug →
anubis	13–7	-0.01	24%	9 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.00	12%	9 Aug →
ancient	13–10	-0.03	14%	8 Aug →
dust2	16–14	-0.04	11%	8 Aug →
nuke	13–7	0.00	18%	8 Aug →
anubis	4–13	0.01	24%	5 Aug →
cache	8–13	0.00	19%	5 Aug →
anubis	14–16	-0.03	15%	31 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.00	15%	31 Jul →
cache	16–13	-0.02	20%	31 Jul →
cache	2–13	-0.08	17%	30 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.00	19%	30 Jul →
dust2	10–13	0.04	17%	30 Jul →
mirage	4–13	-0.01	25%	30 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.02	27%	30 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.08	23%	29 Jul →
ancient	14–16	0.01	20%	29 Jul →
cache	13–8	-0.03	33%	27 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.05	16%	27 Jul →
dust2	13–8	-0.03	15%	27 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.03	21%	21 Jul →
inferno	13–7	-0.02	21%	20 Jul →
ancient	9–13	0.05	28%	20 Jul →
anubis	13–5	-0.03	9%	20 Jul →
ancient	16–13	0.01	26%	17 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.03	16%	17 Jul →
anubis	10–13	0.05	15%	17 Jul →
nuke	11–13	-0.02	22%	17 Jul →
inferno	13–7	-0.05	20%	13 Jul →
ancient	13–11	-0.03	13%	13 Jul →
cache	13–6	-0.01	19%	13 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.08	20%	13 Jul →
anubis	13–3	-0.03	12%	13 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.01	8%	13 Jul →
mirage	5–13	0.01	15%	6 Jul →
ancient	2–13	-0.04	30%	6 Jul →
anubis	13–10	0.01	24%	30 Jun →
ancient	16–14	-0.00	17%	29 Jun →
anubis	16–13	0.03	19%	29 Jun →
inferno	9–13	0.05	19%	28 Jun →
mirage	7–13	-0.01	11%	28 Jun →
mirage	11–13	0.03	36%	22 Jun →
dust2	11–13	0.02	30%	22 Jun →
nuke	9–13	0.03	16%	22 Jun →
inferno	10–13	0.01	11%	18 Jun →
mirage	13–5	-0.01	7%	15 Jun →
anubis	13–5	0.11	16%	15 Jun →
inferno	13–9	0.01	13%	15 Jun →
dust2	8–13	-0.02	11%	15 Jun →
anubis	13–10	0.00	39%	15 Jun →
mirage	10–13	0.06	35%	15 Jun →
anubis	11–13	0.01	15%	12 Jun →
ancient	8–13	-0.01	26%	12 Jun →
ancient	13–6	0.04	18%	12 Jun →
anubis	13–8	0.11	26%	12 Jun →
mirage	13–11	0.13	39%	12 Jun →
anubis	9–13	-0.05	39%	12 Jun →
inferno	13–6	0.12	31%	12 Jun →
cache	5–13	-0.05	19%	12 Jun →
overpass	13–10	0.05	26%	9 Jun →
inferno	13–9	-0.04	11%	9 Jun →
inferno	13–7	0.03	18%	8 Jun →
anubis	16–14	0.01	17%	7 Jun →
inferno	13–7	0.05	27%	30 May →
anubis	13–4	0.07	26%	30 May →
mirage	13–9	0.03	17%	25 May →
ancient	5–13	-0.09	27%	25 May →
mirage	16–13	0.07	23%	24 May →