Nikesles

Nikesles — CS2 Stats

76561199013295505[U:1:1053029777]Steam profile ↗

1,863Tracked matches57%Win rate2023Tracked since
2,048Hours in CS56Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating16,165Purple band · top ~23.8% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,844 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 8 Oct 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,165 -3,184 31 Aug – 8 Oct · 20 days played
16,16519,384peak 19,38431 Aug8 Oct
19,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,844Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
22Days played since 2026-08-31

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,844
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 157 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-31
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-31

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,219 below peak (19,384)
  • -2,894 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 3,835 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-31
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches148——
Win rate51%——
K/D0.98——
Headshot %52%——

Measured 6 Sep 2026 → 11 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,332), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate50.3%48.2%50.9%meets
Shot accuracy3.1%13.3%13.7%10.7% short
Kill/death ratio1.001.071.090.09 short
Match win rate46.4%46.9%48.4%2.0% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNikeslesFACEITLevel 9 · 1,844 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER16,165 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,844csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim60
Positioning59
Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45–51–4Last 10045%Win rateLLWWWWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +1.5pp headshot accuracy · −2ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 569ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 608ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 609ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim6.0
Utility6.1
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels3.7
Clutch2.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 80% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 603ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.0
Positioning5.9
Utility6.1
Mechanics5.7
Opening Duels5.2
Win Impact7.2

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time606ms+50ms
first ⅓ avg 557ms → last ⅓ avg 606ms
Headshot accuracy19.7%−2.6%
first ⅓ avg 22.3% → last ⅓ avg 19.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 9–2 · inferno, 24 Sept →
58%Best headshot accuracy · 1–13 · anubis, 16 Sept →
422msFastest reaction time · 13–9 · cache, 27 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 18 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
11–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 80% over 10anubisWeakest map · 29% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C188–1044%0.01
infernoA1811–761%0.01
mirageC156–940%0.00
anubisD144–1029%0.00
ancientD144–1029%0.01
cacheS108–280%-0.00
nukeC104–640%-0.00
vertigo—10–10%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

51,336Lifetime kills
1.00K/D
3,023Matches
46.4%Match win rate
50.3%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 9 players
3.1%Shot accuracy
7,147MVPs
1,007Hours (in match)
2,327Bombs planted
533Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

4,965inferno
4,213dust2
2,992nuke
1,034vertigo
639office
561train
90cbble
73lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

393Matches
53%Win rate
1.11Avg K/D
86.2ADR
52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

32%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage11151%1.0616.4
Dust26555%1.2217.5
Ancient6455%1.1417.2
Inferno5754%1.1516.9
Anubis3047%1.0817.1
Nuke2945%1.1319.6
Overpass1867%0.9816.3
Vertigo1155%0.9515.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.4%Headshot accuracy
34.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.3%Spray accuracy
75.5%Counter-strafing
11.2°Preaim
603msReaction time
55.0%T opening success
46.2%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
7.7%Flash assists
12.41HE damage / grenade
7.65Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust29–13-0.0713%8 Oct →
dust211–130.0833%8 Oct →
inferno16–120.0114%8 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0118%7 Oct →
mirage5–0-0.0027%7 Oct →
inferno13–110.0333%7 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0517%7 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.0321%6 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0817%6 Oct →
dust213–4-0.0717%6 Oct →
ancient8–130.0116%6 Oct →
ancient11–130.0922%5 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0417%5 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.017%4 Oct →
inferno10–130.0035%4 Oct →
ancient13–30.0127%4 Oct →
cache16–13-0.0321%4 Oct →
ancient12–16-0.0615%4 Oct →
anubis13–50.0020%3 Oct →
cache16–140.0217%3 Oct →
anubis4–13-0.0422%3 Oct →
anubis13–60.1122%3 Oct →
inferno13–70.0420%3 Oct →
ancient3–10-0.0018%3 Oct →
ancient13–40.0317%2 Oct →
mirage13–6-0.019%2 Oct →
anubis16–14-0.0220%2 Oct →
cache13–11-0.0530%2 Oct →
ancient13–10-0.0513%2 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.029%1 Oct →
nuke13–70.0021%1 Oct →
ancient8–130.0228%1 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0513%1 Oct →
cache5–130.0123%30 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0339%30 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0324%30 Sept →
anubis15–15-0.0028%30 Sept →
dust213–80.0929%29 Sept →
anubis11–130.0928%29 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0013%28 Sept →
inferno13–110.0631%28 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0033%28 Sept →
nuke8–130.0211%27 Sept →
anubis11–130.0017%27 Sept →
cache13–90.0219%27 Sept →
anubis10–130.0212%27 Sept →
ancient11–130.0821%25 Sept →
dust29–130.0419%24 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0125%24 Sept →
vertigo9–130.0221%24 Sept →
mirage8–130.0416%24 Sept →
mirage16–130.0014%24 Sept →
nuke13–3-0.0127%24 Sept →
anubis13–30.0338%24 Sept →
inferno8–80.0145%24 Sept →
inferno9–20.1542%24 Sept →
inferno13–110.0729%24 Sept →
cache13–10-0.0324%24 Sept →
mirage5–130.0338%24 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.029%23 Sept →
dust29–130.1132%22 Sept →
dust213–16-0.0924%22 Sept →
inferno13–20.019%22 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0234%22 Sept →
nuke3–13-0.0113%22 Sept →
ancient8–130.0126%22 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0315%22 Sept →
dust214–16-0.0212%20 Sept →
nuke10–130.0324%20 Sept →
mirage15–150.0222%20 Sept →
cache13–50.0821%20 Sept →
anubis4–130.0130%20 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0217%20 Sept →
mirage16–140.0421%20 Sept →
nuke7–90.0019%20 Sept →
inferno9–70.0321%20 Sept →
inferno3–9-0.0723%19 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0111%19 Sept →
nuke3–13-0.0338%19 Sept →
mirage15–15-0.0213%19 Sept →
ancient13–90.0617%19 Sept →
nuke13–110.0215%19 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0619%18 Sept →
dust213–10.0738%18 Sept →
dust213–80.0513%18 Sept →
dust213–90.1119%18 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0827%18 Sept →
cache13–5-0.017%18 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0414%18 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.0121%18 Sept →
inferno14–16-0.0518%17 Sept →
inferno13–70.0136%17 Sept →
cache13–30.0111%17 Sept →
mirage12–16-0.0328%17 Sept →
anubis1–13-0.0258%16 Sept →
ancient11–130.0122%16 Sept →
inferno13–7-0.0326%16 Sept →
nuke13–100.0518%16 Sept →
dust213–100.0325%16 Sept →
mirage13–80.0734%14 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.