Macho latino

Macho latino — CS2 Stats

76561199011463609[U:1:1051197881]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,461Tracked matches46%Win rate2022Tracked since
4,416Hours in CS48Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.0 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating17,156Purple band · top ~19.8% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,317 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Nov 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,156 -1,481 14 Oct – 13 Nov · 23 days played
17,15622,429peak 22,42914 Oct13 Nov
22,841Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,317Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
23Days played since 2026-10-14

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,317
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 — 34 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-10-14
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-10-14

Premier CS Rating

  • 5,273 below peak (22,429)
  • -1,481 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 2,844 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-10-14
  • Blue band first seen 2026-10-14

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches183——
Win rate49%——
K/D0.86——
Headshot %49%——

Measured 14 Oct 2026 → 14 Nov 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,595), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate46.7%45.7%46.8%meets
Shot accuracy3.7%12.7%13.0%9.3% short
Kill/death ratio0.741.051.060.33 short
Match win rate39.8%45.7%46.3%6.5% short

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMacho latinoFACEITLevel 7 · 1,317 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER17,156 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,317csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82
Positioning66
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46–45–9Last 10046%Win rateLLLWWWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating · −4.4pp headshot accuracy · +33ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 620ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 658ms

Last 20

  • 9–10–1 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 641ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim8.2
Utility5.3
Positioning6.6
Opening Duels3.7
Clutch3.2

Excellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Counter-strafing. 93% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

T openings. 69% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 69% on T to 42% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 649ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2
Positioning6.6
Utility5.3
Mechanics9.5
Opening Duels6.4
Win Impact3.8

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time654ms+11ms
first ⅓ avg 643ms → last ⅓ avg 654ms
Headshot accuracy19.3%+0.4%
first ⅓ avg 18.9% → last ⅓ avg 19.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–1 · nuke, 19 Oct →
56%Best headshot accuracy · 2–6 · cache, 7 Nov →
469msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · ancient, 21 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · cache, 20 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L3Current streak
9–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 64% over 11anubisWeakest map · 17% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2311–1248%-0.02
cacheB178–947%-0.01
ancientA148–657%0.01
dust2B136–746%0.00
anubisD122–1017%-0.01
infernoA117–464%-0.01
nukeC104–640%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

110,751Lifetime kills
0.74K/D
6,239Matches
39.8%Match win rate
46.7%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 7 players
3.7%Shot accuracy
10,098MVPs
2,529Hours (in match)
6,001Bombs planted
1,279Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4740,107
AWP16,284
FAMAS3,609
MP92,846
SSG 082,585

Lifetime map wins

8,246inferno
7,208dust2
4,427nuke
3,449vertigo
1,849train
40cbble
28lake
12office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

386Matches
51%Win rate
1.07Avg K/D
81.5ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage9252%1.0915.8
Anubis5852%1.0314.7
Dust25746%1.0316.0
Ancient5547%1.0815.6
Inferno5159%1.0915.2
Nuke3253%1.1216.9
Overpass667%1.2715.5
Cache650%0.9814.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.5%Headshot accuracy
35.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.6%Spray accuracy
92.9%Counter-strafing
6.9°Preaim
649msReaction time
68.9%T opening success
41.9%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
8.1%Flash assists
7.37HE damage / grenade
5.97Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust211–13-0.0118%13 Nov →
mirage7–13-0.0212%12 Nov →
anubis11–13-0.0210%12 Nov →
mirage13–80.0413%12 Nov →
cache8–4-0.0220%12 Nov →
dust213–80.0023%12 Nov →
dust210–13-0.0519%11 Nov →
dust213–70.0818%9 Nov →
dust213–50.0516%9 Nov →
anubis11–13-0.019%8 Nov →
cache8–13-0.0513%8 Nov →
anubis11–130.018%8 Nov →
ancient11–13-0.0723%8 Nov →
mirage13–11-0.0914%8 Nov →
nuke7–130.0728%8 Nov →
anubis13–7-0.0213%8 Nov →
mirage15–15-0.0820%8 Nov →
inferno13–11-0.0321%7 Nov →
dust213–8-0.056%7 Nov →
cache2–6-0.0156%7 Nov →
nuke16–14-0.0317%7 Nov →
dust213–60.0329%7 Nov →
mirage15–150.0323%6 Nov →
cache9–13-0.0321%6 Nov →
nuke13–70.0315%6 Nov →
dust210–130.0126%6 Nov →
mirage8–13-0.0019%3 Nov →
anubis6–13-0.0427%3 Nov →
nuke13–8-0.0222%31 Oct →
cache5–13-0.0626%30 Oct →
nuke15–150.0412%30 Oct →
ancient13–80.0723%29 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0721%29 Oct →
dust211–130.0120%29 Oct →
dust210–130.0114%29 Oct →
ancient13–70.0110%29 Oct →
nuke15–150.0120%28 Oct →
ancient13–90.0417%28 Oct →
ancient13–50.1023%28 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0410%28 Oct →
anubis15–15-0.0116%28 Oct →
mirage9–130.0520%27 Oct →
anubis6–130.0620%27 Oct →
cache13–8-0.0226%27 Oct →
anubis9–13-0.0616%27 Oct →
mirage14–160.0019%27 Oct →
cache13–16-0.0124%27 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0132%26 Oct →
cache10–13-0.0516%26 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0018%26 Oct →
ancient2–13-0.085%26 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0618%25 Oct →
inferno1–13-0.1044%25 Oct →
ancient13–9-0.018%25 Oct →
cache8–13-0.0111%25 Oct →
inferno13–40.0321%25 Oct →
mirage15–15-0.0113%24 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.0514%24 Oct →
inferno7–130.0117%24 Oct →
cache13–11-0.0710%24 Oct →
mirage0–13-0.0525%23 Oct →
anubis14–16-0.0118%23 Oct →
ancient16–130.0221%23 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.0211%23 Oct →
inferno13–4-0.0211%23 Oct →
mirage13–60.0117%23 Oct →
cache15–150.068%22 Oct →
mirage13–6-0.0223%22 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.0114%22 Oct →
cache13–6-0.0011%22 Oct →
mirage9–5-0.0722%22 Oct →
mirage13–5-0.0130%22 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.0212%22 Oct →
ancient16–130.0713%22 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.0326%21 Oct →
ancient3–130.0016%21 Oct →
anubis13–100.0627%21 Oct →
cache13–5-0.0220%21 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0315%21 Oct →
cache15–150.0417%21 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0329%21 Oct →
ancient13–70.0520%21 Oct →
inferno13–110.0013%20 Oct →
ancient9–130.0334%20 Oct →
mirage13–4-0.0226%20 Oct →
cache13–10.0315%20 Oct →
mirage13–30.0216%20 Oct →
cache13–20.0129%20 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0515%20 Oct →
mirage3–13-0.0532%20 Oct →
inferno13–80.014%19 Oct →
inferno11–130.0731%19 Oct →
cache13–50.035%19 Oct →
nuke13–10.1213%19 Oct →
mirage13–110.0317%19 Oct →
dust211–13-0.015%18 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.0214%18 Oct →
mirage12–12-0.0219%18 Oct →
mirage13–4-0.0415%18 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0227%17 Oct →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.