Torkel

Torkel — CS2 Stats

SE76561199003810561[U:1:1043544833]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

634Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,293Hours in CS19Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.6 StrongOpening Duellist
Premier CS Rating19,307Top 50% of 211,494 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~11.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#94985 of 258447 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 28 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,307 -1,127 26 Aug – 28 Oct · 33 days played
18,36721,019peak 21,01926 Aug28 Oct
21,019Peak Premier in tracked matches
34Days played since 2026-08-26

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,712 below peak (21,019)
  • -38 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 693 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,630), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate48.8%42.7%43.8%above
Shot accuracy12.0%11.2%12.0%meets
Kill/death ratio1.260.991.02above
Match win rate44.8%43.9%44.7%meets

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 5 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTorkelFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER19,307 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim94
Positioning81
Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–47–3Last 10050%Win rateWWLLWLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +2.9pp headshot accuracy · +14ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 447ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 473ms

Last 20

  • 8–11–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 466ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Opening Duellist — Winning opening duels is what stands out in this profile (+1.5 against its own average). How often you WIN the first duel — CSDB cannot yet see how often you take it.

Aim9.4
Utility4.7
Positioning8.1
Opening Duels8.6

Sharp aimerStrong positioning

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 94 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 67% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

T openings. 66% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.4
Positioning8.1
Utility4.7
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels9.2
Win Impact4.4

Composite 7.6/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.07+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.06 → last ⅓ avg 0.07
Reaction time490ms−8ms
first ⅓ avg 498ms → last ⅓ avg 490ms
Headshot accuracy21.3%−1.8%
first ⅓ avg 23.1% → last ⅓ avg 21.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.25Best match rating · 9–4 · vertigo, 21 Sept →
45%Best headshot accuracy · 10–3 · cache, 15 Oct →
359msFastest reaction time · 2–11 · cache, 27 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · anubis, 17 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W2Current streak
3–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 60% over 5anubisWeakest map · 31% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB2513–1252%0.05
infernoB1910–953%0.05
cacheB168–850%0.03
anubisD134–931%0.05
dust2A116–555%0.03
ancientB105–550%0.07
mirageA53–260%0.07
vertigo—11–0100%0.25

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

42,729Lifetime kills
1.26K/D · Top 25% of Level 4 players
2,034Matches
44.8%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 4 players
48.8%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 4 players
12.0%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 4 players
5,025MVPs
815Hours (in match)
1,466Bombs planted
497Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,819nuke
1,719inferno
1,018dust2
798vertigo
646lake
256train
84cbble
75office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

22Matches
64%Win rate
1.44Avg K/D
—ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

—1v1 clutch win
—1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.0%Headshot accuracy
39.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.8%Spray accuracy
84.0%Counter-strafing
7.2°Preaim
480msReaction time
66.3%T opening success
67.5%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
5.0%Flash assists
9.45HE damage / grenade
5.60Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–40.1125%28 Oct →
nuke13–70.0514%28 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0125%28 Oct →
nuke10–130.0112%28 Oct →
nuke13–70.0918%28 Oct →
inferno12–160.0219%27 Oct →
nuke13–100.0530%27 Oct →
dust27–130.0731%27 Oct →
cache2–110.0925%27 Oct →
anubis10–130.1020%27 Oct →
cache9–130.0415%25 Oct →
ancient9–130.0113%25 Oct →
nuke9–130.0220%23 Oct →
inferno13–90.0518%22 Oct →
nuke13–60.1513%22 Oct →
nuke9–130.1114%22 Oct →
inferno13–100.0624%21 Oct →
dust215–150.0426%21 Oct →
nuke13–40.0128%18 Oct →
dust213–160.0321%17 Oct →
anubis13–00.0814%17 Oct →
nuke5–130.0728%17 Oct →
cache13–5-0.0018%15 Oct →
inferno13–10.1314%15 Oct →
anubis10–130.1115%15 Oct →
nuke11–130.0413%15 Oct →
cache10–30.1145%15 Oct →
cache13–60.1032%15 Oct →
cache7–13-0.0319%15 Oct →
ancient13–10.1633%15 Oct →
nuke9–60.1513%15 Oct →
nuke13–30.1029%13 Oct →
nuke10–130.1118%13 Oct →
mirage13–50.0614%13 Oct →
nuke13–70.0911%13 Oct →
cache13–8-0.0312%13 Oct →
ancient13–60.0811%13 Oct →
cache6–13-0.0324%13 Oct →
anubis13–110.0413%13 Oct →
anubis7–130.1316%12 Oct →
mirage13–40.0835%12 Oct →
nuke15–150.0720%12 Oct →
ancient9–130.0421%12 Oct →
inferno12–120.0420%12 Oct →
dust213–30.0133%11 Oct →
cache5–130.0220%8 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.0824%8 Oct →
inferno13–40.0724%7 Oct →
inferno11–130.0316%7 Oct →
nuke13–80.0416%6 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.0318%5 Oct →
cache13–11-0.0517%5 Oct →
dust213–9-0.0220%5 Oct →
cache13–30.1233%5 Oct →
anubis9–130.0123%4 Oct →
ancient10–130.0018%4 Oct →
inferno1–13-0.0623%4 Oct →
cache13–50.1220%4 Oct →
anubis13–90.0216%3 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.0420%2 Oct →
nuke13–40.0716%2 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0231%2 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.067%30 Sept →
ancient13–70.0514%30 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0114%30 Sept →
dust213–100.0115%30 Sept →
mirage10–130.0614%30 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0111%24 Sept →
inferno13–10.1111%24 Sept →
anubis8–130.0222%24 Sept →
nuke13–60.0018%22 Sept →
inferno13–40.2419%22 Sept →
inferno9–50.0717%22 Sept →
nuke9–60.1232%22 Sept →
vertigo9–40.2528%21 Sept →
anubis10–130.0524%20 Sept →
nuke13–160.0121%20 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0424%16 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0212%16 Sept →
dust213–30.1031%16 Sept →
nuke1–13-0.0715%13 Sept →
inferno11–130.0518%9 Sept →
anubis13–100.1226%8 Sept →
cache9–13-0.0125%8 Sept →
cache13–100.0121%3 Sept →
inferno13–80.0033%3 Sept →
ancient13–50.0521%31 Aug →
dust213–30.1340%31 Aug →
mirage11–130.0123%30 Aug →
inferno13–20.1543%30 Aug →
anubis8–13-0.0313%30 Aug →
nuke11–130.0534%30 Aug →
ancient13–90.2014%29 Aug →
cache9–130.0931%29 Aug →
inferno8–130.0224%29 Aug →
inferno13–110.0220%29 Aug →
nuke13–30.0916%29 Aug →
dust213–160.0332%27 Aug →
cache10–130.0328%27 Aug →
ancient13–160.1018%26 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.