jopa

jopa — CS2 Stats

FI76561198997676363[U:1:1037410635]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

450Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,254Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating3.6 LearningPositional Player
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 22 Sep 2026 (20 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+4Tracked matches · now 450
+3.3ppWin rate · 43.3% → 46.7%

Rating over time

22,103Peak Premier in tracked matches
47Days played since 2025-11-17

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,998), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate39.4%42.7%43.7%4.3% short
Shot accuracy16.1%11.3%12.0%above
Kill/death ratio0.880.991.020.13 short
Match win rate46.4%43.9%44.7%above

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGjopaFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim43
Positioning46
Utility42

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53–43–4Last 10053%Win rateWWLWLLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +2.4pp headshot accuracy · +62ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 576ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 590ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 559ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.3 against its own average).

Aim4.3
Utility4.2
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels0.5
Clutch0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 586ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 60% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.3
Positioning4.6
Utility4.2
Mechanics2.2
Opening Duels0.7
Win Impact3.9

Composite 3.6/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.04−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.04
Reaction time592ms−20ms
first ⅓ avg 612ms → last ⅓ avg 592ms
Headshot accuracy15.7%+1.3%
first ⅓ avg 14.4% → last ⅓ avg 15.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 9–5 · vertigo, 13 Jan →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 2–13 · inferno, 1 Feb →
375msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · train, 17 Nov →
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 9 Dec →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
W2Current streak
4–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 67% over 6infernoWeakest map · 0% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA3520–1557%-0.04
nukeA2615–1158%-0.03
trainA148–657%-0.01
cacheS64–267%-0.02
infernoD50–50%-0.06
ancient—41–325%-0.08
anubis—40–40%-0.06
dust2—22–0100%-0.01
overpass—22–0100%0.03
sanctum—10–10%-0.05
vertigo—11–0100%0.13

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

31,620Lifetime kills
0.88K/D
1,827Matches
46.4%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 4 players
39.4%Headshot %
16.1%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 4 players
4,348MVPs
696Hours (in match)
1,249Bombs planted
307Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

5,178nuke
3,391train
2,586inferno
485vertigo
482dust2
104cbble
28office
27lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

106Matches
53%Win rate
0.83Avg K/D
69.8ADR
35%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke3100%0.6210.7
Mirage250%1.3315.0
Ancient250%0.458.5
Dust21100%0.6813.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.8%Headshot accuracy
33.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.5%Spray accuracy
59.7%Counter-strafing
11.4°Preaim
586msReaction time
35.5%T opening success
29.7%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
3.0%Flash assists
5.63HE damage / grenade
8.37Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.4594% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–100.0419%7 Oct →
mirage13–4-0.0115%24 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.1121%24 Sept →
cache16–14-0.0221%23 Sept →
mirage2–13-0.0814%18 Sept →
cache3–13-0.0414%12 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0632%3 Sept →
cache13–30.0116%3 Sept →
train13–80.0115%31 Aug →
nuke13–5-0.0511%30 Aug →
anubis3–13-0.0815%30 Aug →
mirage13–9-0.0516%30 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0912%30 Aug →
cache4–13-0.0612%30 Aug →
nuke13–10-0.0321%28 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.0318%28 Aug →
cache13–8-0.0310%20 Aug →
nuke9–13-0.0316%20 Aug →
inferno14–16-0.0520%19 Aug →
nuke9–13-0.0415%19 Aug →
nuke13–10-0.0417%12 Apr →
mirage13–90.0117%12 Apr →
dust213–11-0.0520%29 Mar →
anubis6–13-0.0418%28 Mar →
ancient4–13-0.096%28 Mar →
nuke11–13-0.0726%22 Mar →
train3–13-0.0511%22 Mar →
mirage11–13-0.057%15 Mar →
mirage13–6-0.0420%19 Feb →
overpass9–70.0712%19 Feb →
nuke11–13-0.0421%17 Feb →
sanctum6–9-0.0513%17 Feb →
inferno3–9-0.110%17 Feb →
nuke13–8-0.0731%15 Feb →
mirage13–8-0.0421%12 Feb →
nuke6–130.027%11 Feb →
mirage10–13-0.0316%11 Feb →
nuke11–13-0.057%10 Feb →
train3–13-0.0717%10 Feb →
mirage4–13-0.0328%10 Feb →
mirage2–13-0.0910%10 Feb →
nuke11–13-0.068%7 Feb →
dust213–100.0223%7 Feb →
train13–3-0.0111%6 Feb →
train10–13-0.0621%3 Feb →
overpass13–7-0.0110%3 Feb →
nuke13–8-0.094%1 Feb →
inferno2–13-0.0950%1 Feb →
ancient12–5-0.0221%1 Feb →
mirage13–7-0.0319%27 Jan →
anubis3–13-0.0820%27 Jan →
anubis8–13-0.0413%26 Jan →
nuke13–9-0.0424%26 Jan →
mirage13–9-0.0311%23 Jan →
inferno11–13-0.0019%17 Jan →
mirage15–15-0.0610%17 Jan →
mirage13–6-0.0515%14 Jan →
mirage13–9-0.0211%14 Jan →
mirage8–13-0.0415%13 Jan →
vertigo9–50.1337%13 Jan →
nuke2–9-0.0950%13 Jan →
inferno8–8-0.029%13 Jan →
train13–50.0411%13 Jan →
mirage13–8-0.0622%13 Jan →
nuke13–2-0.0320%11 Jan →
mirage13–3-0.0715%11 Jan →
mirage8–1-0.0610%11 Jan →
train13–30.0116%11 Jan →
nuke13–20.015%11 Jan →
mirage13–3-0.1015%2 Jan →
mirage11–13-0.038%1 Jan →
nuke13–11-0.0013%1 Jan →
train8–13-0.0410%1 Jan →
mirage13–5-0.0518%19 Dec →
train8–13-0.073%16 Dec →
mirage13–9-0.058%16 Dec →
nuke13–0-0.0215%9 Dec →
mirage9–130.0118%9 Dec →
nuke8–80.0113%9 Dec →
nuke13–90.0525%7 Dec →
train13–10.0733%7 Dec →
mirage13–9-0.0218%7 Dec →
ancient2–13-0.0920%7 Dec →
mirage13–6-0.0011%2 Dec →
train13–10.076%2 Dec →
nuke13–10-0.0227%1 Dec →
mirage13–10-0.0613%1 Dec →
train13–7-0.0329%1 Dec →
mirage4–13-0.0720%28 Nov →
nuke13–6-0.048%27 Nov →
mirage10–13-0.089%27 Nov →
nuke13–9-0.0011%26 Nov →
mirage12–12-0.0313%26 Nov →
mirage13–10-0.0413%24 Nov →
nuke11–130.018%24 Nov →
train13–90.009%24 Nov →
mirage6–13-0.0310%24 Nov →
nuke13–100.0126%20 Nov →
nuke10–13-0.119%17 Nov →
train7–130.0017%17 Nov →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.