serkka8

serkka8 — CS2 Stats

FI76561198079779965[U:1:119514237]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,076Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating18,858Top 50% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~13% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#88180 of 223511 tracked
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Sep 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 18,858 → 18,858
0Faceit ELO · 1,308 → 1,308
+1Tracked matches · now 1,076
+3.5ppWin rate · 55.2% → 58.6%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 30 days played since 13 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,858 +851 13 Jun15 Sept · 20 days played
16,61719,404peak 19,40413 Jun15 Sept
19,404Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,308Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
30Days played since 2026-06-13

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,308
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 43 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-15
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-15

Premier CS Rating

  • 546 below peak (19,404)
  • +1,594 over 30 days · improving
  • +851 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 1,142 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-15
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-15

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGserkka8PREMIER18,858 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,308csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66
Positioning41
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48493Last 10048%Win rateWLLWWWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +1.0pp headshot accuracy · −34ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 558ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 607ms

Last 20

  • 1271 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 624ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim6.6
Utility5.9
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels1.9
Clutch5.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 39% on CT to 23% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 612ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6
Positioning4.1
Utility5.9
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels1.1
Win Impact7.9

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time627ms−5ms
first ⅓ avg 632ms → last ⅓ avg 627ms
Headshot accuracy18.7%−2.2%
first ⅓ avg 20.9% → last ⅓ avg 18.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–5 · anubis, 4 Aug
39%Best headshot accuracy · 13–9 · nuke, 6 Jul
406msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · inferno, 15 Sept
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 4 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
411In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 62% over 13dust2Weakest map · 29% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB32151747%-0.02
nukeC1771041%-0.03
dust2D1441029%-0.03
cacheA138562%-0.02
infernoA116555%0.02
ancientB84450%-0.02
anubis43175%0.00
overpass110100%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

523Matches
51%Win rate
0.87Avg K/D
64.3ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

47%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2941%0.7910.8
Nuke1493%0.9811.4
Train1471%1.1813.8
Ancient1346%0.6811.8
Dust21040%0.7911.4
Anubis743%0.7510.6
Inferno729%0.8713.7
Cache30%0.8016.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.8%Headshot accuracy
30.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.6%Spray accuracy
82.2%Counter-strafing
8.2°Preaim
612msReaction time
23.3%T opening success
38.7%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
9.7%Flash assists
7.08HE damage / grenade
7.34Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 23.3224% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–50.0117%15 Sept
nuke4–13-0.0318%15 Sept
inferno7–13-0.0311%15 Sept
cache13–40.0519%15 Sept
mirage13–80.0319%15 Sept
inferno5–0-0.0514%15 Sept
anubis13–100.0225%11 Sept
ancient5–13-0.0515%11 Sept
mirage9–13-0.0428%11 Sept
mirage16–13-0.0120%7 Sept
cache16–14-0.0120%7 Sept
nuke2–13-0.0814%7 Sept
inferno6–13-0.0221%7 Sept
dust25–13-0.0612%6 Sept
mirage13–9-0.0714%5 Sept
dust213–70.0016%5 Sept
nuke13–10-0.0418%4 Sept
mirage13–1-0.0027%4 Sept
inferno15–150.0119%4 Sept
nuke13–2-0.0613%4 Sept
mirage13–70.0429%4 Sept
dust213–11-0.0422%4 Sept
mirage11–13-0.049%1 Sept
cache7–13-0.0415%1 Sept
nuke13–5-0.0229%30 Aug
anubis3–13-0.130%30 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0517%30 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0634%30 Aug
cache4–13-0.0924%30 Aug
cache16–14-0.0616%26 Aug
dust214–16-0.0427%26 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0816%25 Aug
cache6–13-0.0520%25 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0725%25 Aug
cache4–13-0.0212%25 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0626%22 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0715%22 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0218%22 Aug
mirage9–13-0.060%22 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0324%12 Aug
cache13–80.0113%12 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0420%12 Aug
mirage16–130.0125%12 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0224%12 Aug
nuke13–90.0520%9 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0125%9 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0734%9 Aug
dust25–13-0.0324%9 Aug
dust213–10-0.0814%7 Aug
mirage16–13-0.0328%7 Aug
cache13–9-0.0121%5 Aug
inferno13–70.0215%5 Aug
mirage5–130.0123%5 Aug
dust28–13-0.0429%5 Aug
dust211–130.0513%5 Aug
anubis13–50.0110%5 Aug
dust213–7-0.0138%5 Aug
inferno13–30.1016%5 Aug
dust24–13-0.1015%5 Aug
mirage13–50.1021%4 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0118%4 Aug
anubis13–50.1116%4 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0211%3 Aug
mirage11–130.0122%3 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0928%2 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0323%2 Aug
cache13–11-0.0332%2 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0519%2 Aug
mirage13–30.0513%1 Aug
dust214–160.0028%1 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0019%1 Aug
dust23–13-0.0417%31 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0819%31 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0822%31 Jul
dust29–130.000%31 Jul
nuke13–40.0327%29 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0516%29 Jul
inferno13–60.0411%29 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0533%25 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0225%25 Jul
cache13–10-0.0127%25 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0521%20 Jul
nuke2–13-0.0716%20 Jul
cache13–8-0.0214%15 Jul
mirage13–70.0324%15 Jul
nuke15–15-0.0421%14 Jul
nuke13–9-0.0539%6 Jul
inferno15–150.0825%6 Jul
mirage13–70.0123%2 Jul
mirage13–90.0219%27 Jun
dust26–130.0022%21 Jun
ancient13–90.0419%21 Jun
mirage6–130.0128%13 Jun
inferno13–80.0227%13 Jun
nuke13–30.0522%13 Jun
cache9–13-0.0217%13 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0321%13 Jun
overpass13–8-0.0116%13 Jun
inferno8–13-0.0120%13 Jun
ancient13–10-0.0018%13 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →