MVISSIV_

MVISSIV_ — CS2 Stats

FI76561198997353536[U:1:1037087808]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,104Tracked matches54%Win rate2021Tracked since
5,092Hours in CS29Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.8 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating25,229Top 10% of 213,399 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#19432 of 260016 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 4 Nov 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

−242Premier CS Rating · 25,471 → 25,229

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,229 +3,445 29 Sept – 5 Nov · 12 days played
21,78425,471peak 25,47129 Sept5 Nov
25,621Peak Premier in tracked matches
15Days played since 2026-09-29

Premier CS Rating

  • 242 below peak (25,471)
  • +302 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 4,771 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,525), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate52.2%46.8%48.2%above
Shot accuracy13.4%13.0%13.2%meets
Kill/death ratio1.081.061.07meets
Match win rate45.6%46.3%46.9%1.3% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMVISSIV_FACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER25,229 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning64
Utility78

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55–39–6Last 10055%Win rateTLLWWWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −5.4pp headshot accuracy · −35ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–2–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 532ms

Last 10

  • 6–3–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 527ms

Last 20

  • 12–7–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 544ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim8.5
Utility7.8
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels5.8
Clutch6.2

Sharp aimerHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 85 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Utility. Utility score of 78 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 552ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning6.4
Utility7.8
Mechanics8.2
Opening Duels6.2
Win Impact6.2

Composite 7.8/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.05+0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.05
Reaction time558ms+25ms
first ⅓ avg 533ms → last ⅓ avg 558ms
Headshot accuracy16.7%+1.6%
first ⅓ avg 15.2% → last ⅓ avg 16.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.36Best match rating · 9–4 · inferno, 9 Oct →
35%Best headshot accuracy · 9–3 · inferno, 2 Oct →
398msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · italy, 25 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 25 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
6–2In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 86% over 7infernoWeakest map · 50% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientB158–753%0.04
dust2A159–660%0.00
mirageA148–657%0.01
infernoB147–750%0.07
nukeA116–555%0.07
cacheB105–550%0.01
anubisS76–186%0.05
trainA53–260%0.07
vertigo—41–325%0.01
italy—21–150%0.06
overpass—21–150%0.04
poseidon—10–10%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (50% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

159,152Lifetime kills
1.08K/D · Top 50% of Level 8 players
7,157Matches
45.6%Match win rate
52.2%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 8 players
13.4%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 8 players
18,933MVPs
3,065Hours (in match)
8,118Bombs planted
2,247Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4758,664
MP96,598
AWP6,252
MAC-104,574
FAMAS4,394

Lifetime map wins

12,977inferno
10,367nuke
9,555dust2
5,142vertigo
3,142train
669office
371cbble
295italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,218Matches
50%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
87.3ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

51%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke4854%1.4018.9
Ancient3853%1.2417.4
Inferno3554%1.1316.3
Mirage3043%0.9915.3
Anubis2864%1.4018.1
Dust22446%1.1517.9
Vertigo2438%1.2218.6
Overpass1050%1.3620.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.6%Headshot accuracy
39.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.3%Spray accuracy
87.0%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
552msReaction time
56.3%T opening success
53.7%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
11.7%Flash assists
8.37HE damage / grenade
18.41Flashes / match

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache15–150.0612%5 Nov →
mirage10–13-0.0419%5 Nov →
nuke8–130.016%5 Nov →
anubis13–100.0415%4 Nov →
ancient13–20.0811%4 Nov →
dust213–10-0.0123%4 Nov →
dust21–13-0.1022%4 Nov →
ancient13–70.0516%4 Nov →
nuke13–20.099%4 Nov →
inferno13–30.047%4 Nov →
mirage13–60.0317%2 Nov →
ancient5–13-0.0227%2 Nov →
dust213–160.0417%2 Nov →
mirage13–30.0724%2 Nov →
dust213–90.0010%26 Oct →
italy13–60.1122%25 Oct →
train13–60.1122%25 Oct →
vertigo6–130.0615%25 Oct →
anubis13–10.066%25 Oct →
cache5–130.0234%25 Oct →
dust26–130.1315%25 Oct →
inferno3–130.0123%25 Oct →
nuke13–50.2013%25 Oct →
mirage16–13-0.0019%25 Oct →
mirage1–130.0514%25 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.0216%25 Oct →
ancient12–120.0311%25 Oct →
train11–130.1318%25 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0121%25 Oct →
anubis13–20.1413%24 Oct →
nuke8–130.0819%24 Oct →
inferno13–20.0910%24 Oct →
ancient12–40.0526%24 Oct →
cache13–10-0.0115%24 Oct →
train13–60.1726%24 Oct →
mirage12–120.0912%24 Oct →
dust25–130.0319%24 Oct →
cache13–100.0921%22 Oct →
italy12–120.0118%22 Oct →
ancient13–40.1228%22 Oct →
ancient7–40.0515%22 Oct →
train13–11-0.0613%22 Oct →
inferno13–100.1016%22 Oct →
overpass12–120.0616%22 Oct →
anubis9–130.0125%22 Oct →
dust29–130.0115%22 Oct →
dust216–14-0.0015%22 Oct →
ancient6–130.1217%22 Oct →
vertigo13–9-0.0013%22 Oct →
nuke13–60.0717%22 Oct →
cache5–13-0.0128%22 Oct →
dust213–50.0618%22 Oct →
mirage15–15-0.0212%22 Oct →
inferno10–130.0010%12 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0415%12 Oct →
cache13–70.0328%10 Oct →
mirage13–90.0510%10 Oct →
dust213–7-0.0312%10 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0019%10 Oct →
cache7–13-0.0523%10 Oct →
anubis13–90.0213%9 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0416%9 Oct →
inferno10–130.0929%9 Oct →
inferno2–130.0632%9 Oct →
inferno9–40.3624%9 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.036%9 Oct →
inferno3–13-0.067%9 Oct →
dust213–10-0.0515%9 Oct →
dust213–110.0023%9 Oct →
mirage16–14-0.036%8 Oct →
mirage12–4-0.0211%8 Oct →
nuke5–130.0119%8 Oct →
nuke13–30.0611%8 Oct →
dust213–30.0015%8 Oct →
mirage13–80.0317%8 Oct →
cache13–100.0019%8 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.0623%8 Oct →
train4–13-0.0216%2 Oct →
vertigo2–100.0412%2 Oct →
poseidon6–9-0.0322%2 Oct →
vertigo2–9-0.0710%2 Oct →
inferno9–30.1535%2 Oct →
nuke9–10.2217%2 Oct →
overpass9–60.0215%2 Oct →
inferno6–130.1311%1 Oct →
ancient13–40.0113%1 Oct →
ancient13–60.1322%1 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.048%1 Oct →
inferno13–7-0.0019%1 Oct →
anubis13–110.017%30 Sept →
anubis13–50.058%30 Sept →
mirage8–130.019%30 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0213%30 Sept →
dust213–6-0.0212%30 Sept →
inferno13–30.0615%30 Sept →
cache13–40.0117%30 Sept →
ancient16–140.0518%30 Sept →
ancient13–16-0.0312%29 Sept →
nuke13–30.0922%29 Sept →
ancient8–130.0511%29 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.