snickers17

snickers17 — CS2 Stats

LT76561198994325354[U:1:1034059626]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

485Tracked matches69%Win rate2024Tracked since
795Hours in CS7Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidAll-Rounder
Premier CS Rating15,404Purple band · top ~26.8% of ranked players (population est.)
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 28 Oct 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,404 +5,405 25 Jul – 28 Oct · 34 days played
9,99916,213peak 16,21325 Jul28 Oct
Faceit ELO: 913 +0 12 Sept – 18 Sept · 3 observations
913913peak 91312 Sept18 Sept
16,336Peak Premier in tracked matches
913Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
38Days played since 2026-07-25

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 913
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 — 138 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-12
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-09-12

Premier CS Rating

  • 809 below peak (16,213)
  • +2,171 over 30 days · improving
  • +5,032 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 4,596 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-12
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-12

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Purple band among CSDB-tracked players (n=37,767), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPurple band medianPink band medianvs Pink band
Headshot rate46.2%44.4%46.9%meets
Shot accuracy0.0%11.9%13.0%13.0% short
Kill/death ratio1.391.031.08above
Match win rate43.4%45.2%46.7%3.3% short

This profile matches the typical Pink band player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Pink band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGsnickers17PREMIER15,404 · Purple bandPEAK ELO913csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim78
Positioning53
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY59–37–4Last 10059%Win rateLLLLWWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −0.4pp headshot accuracy · −86ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 502ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 503ms

Last 20

  • 12–7–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 546ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-Rounder — No style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim7.8
Utility5.0
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels3.2
Clutch5.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 65% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 65% on T to 36% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.8
Positioning5.3
Utility5.0
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels5.1
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.05+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.05
Reaction time546ms−27ms
first ⅓ avg 573ms → last ⅓ avg 546ms
Headshot accuracy16.0%−0.2%
first ⅓ avg 16.1% → last ⅓ avg 16.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 9–3 · inferno, 24 Aug →
36%Best headshot accuracy · 13–2 · anubis, 26 Aug →
406msFastest reaction time · 10–0 · dust2, 23 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 19 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L4Current streak
4–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 89% over 9nukeWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A3219–1359%0.03
mirageS2013–765%0.06
infernoB189–950%0.03
ancientB136–746%0.05
anubisS98–189%0.07
nukeD62–433%0.02
vertigo—11–0100%-0.01
overpass—11–0100%0.19

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

18,885Lifetime kills
1.39K/D · Top 10% of Purple band
959Matches
43.4%Match win rate
46.2%Headshot % · Top 50% of Purple band
0.0%Shot accuracy
1,978MVPs
341Hours (in match)
682Bombs planted
279Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,032dust2
641inferno
192nuke
92vertigo
26train
9office
8italy
1ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

43Matches
51%Win rate
1.35Avg K/D
86.4ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

46%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust21258%1.6018.2
Ancient944%1.1815.3
Mirage812%1.3016.9
Anubis875%1.1614.3
Inferno450%1.2619.8
Cache1100%1.8311.0
Nuke1100%1.7124.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.4%Headshot accuracy
34.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.4%Spray accuracy
79.9%Counter-strafing
7.7°Preaim
543msReaction time
64.7%T opening success
35.8%CT opening success
0.44Enemies flashed / flash
3.8%Flash assists
7.51HE damage / grenade
13.27Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4444 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 35.7751% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust211–130.0217%28 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0420%28 Oct →
mirage6–130.1319%28 Oct →
dust211–13-0.018%25 Oct →
anubis13–90.049%25 Oct →
anubis13–60.0316%20 Oct →
dust213–30.0823%19 Oct →
anubis13–80.1023%19 Oct →
dust213–100.0612%18 Oct →
inferno9–00.1414%18 Oct →
ancient13–5-0.0227%18 Oct →
dust212–120.0312%16 Oct →
dust210–130.0120%16 Oct →
mirage11–130.0419%14 Oct →
mirage13–110.1414%14 Oct →
inferno9–130.0523%12 Oct →
mirage13–30.028%12 Oct →
dust213–50.0411%12 Oct →
mirage13–90.0112%11 Oct →
ancient11–10.1022%10 Oct →
dust213–70.054%10 Oct →
dust213–8-0.048%9 Oct →
dust213–30.0717%9 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.017%4 Oct →
anubis13–90.1115%4 Oct →
inferno13–70.059%28 Sept →
dust213–30.1318%26 Sept →
dust24–20.0321%26 Sept →
inferno5–130.0223%26 Sept →
ancient13–70.0621%22 Sept →
ancient13–60.1722%16 Sept →
mirage13–60.1114%16 Sept →
mirage11–130.0719%6 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.058%6 Sept →
dust213–60.0119%30 Aug →
dust213–100.0617%30 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.0016%30 Aug →
mirage10–130.0515%30 Aug →
inferno0–9-0.1710%30 Aug →
inferno0–9-0.2311%30 Aug →
mirage13–70.1517%30 Aug →
mirage13–70.1024%30 Aug →
inferno8–130.0126%30 Aug →
mirage14–160.0014%30 Aug →
anubis5–130.0118%30 Aug →
ancient11–130.0211%29 Aug →
anubis13–20.0936%26 Aug →
inferno9–1-0.004%25 Aug →
vertigo13–4-0.0114%25 Aug →
nuke7–13-0.0825%25 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0930%25 Aug →
inferno8–8-0.1111%24 Aug →
overpass9–20.1910%24 Aug →
nuke9–60.147%24 Aug →
nuke9–130.0529%24 Aug →
dust213–80.0635%24 Aug →
mirage13–50.1134%24 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0313%24 Aug →
nuke5–130.0416%24 Aug →
inferno9–60.1519%24 Aug →
inferno9–30.2117%24 Aug →
inferno9–30.1631%24 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0613%24 Aug →
dust213–40.0430%24 Aug →
dust213–110.0620%24 Aug →
nuke8–13-0.0115%24 Aug →
ancient13–30.0116%24 Aug →
dust213–50.0218%23 Aug →
dust210–00.0624%23 Aug →
ancient2–13-0.0317%23 Aug →
dust213–100.0226%22 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0412%19 Aug →
mirage13–00.039%19 Aug →
dust215–150.0214%17 Aug →
mirage13–50.0216%17 Aug →
anubis16–120.0315%15 Aug →
inferno14–160.0414%15 Aug →
ancient8–130.1010%13 Aug →
mirage16–130.0210%13 Aug →
ancient6–130.0318%10 Aug →
mirage13–90.0715%10 Aug →
dust213–60.0311%9 Aug →
mirage16–120.0914%9 Aug →
inferno13–60.0714%8 Aug →
dust213–80.0214%8 Aug →
ancient13–40.1027%7 Aug →
anubis13–50.0919%7 Aug →
ancient7–130.0719%7 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0318%7 Aug →
dust213–60.0312%4 Aug →
inferno13–40.0420%4 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0312%3 Aug →
dust27–130.0318%3 Aug →
mirage13–70.0616%31 Jul →
dust210–130.1316%31 Jul →
ancient10–130.0312%28 Jul →
dust215–150.0220%28 Jul →
anubis13–110.1011%27 Jul →
inferno13–100.0822%27 Jul →
nuke13–100.0118%25 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.