Liv

Liv — CS2 Stats

GB76561198992627635[U:1:1032361907]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,490Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,290Hours in CS13Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating25,111Top 25% of 190,010 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#18746 of 238041 tracked
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 21 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+112Premier CS Rating · 24,999 → 25,111
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 42 days played since 29 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,111 -3,088 29 Apr22 Sept · 34 days played
23,22328,841peak 28,84129 Apr22 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,583 +0 2 Sept22 Sept · 3 observations
1,5831,583peak 1,5832 Sept22 Sept
28,841Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,583Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
42Days played since 2026-04-29

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,583
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 168 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,730 below peak (28,841)
  • +1,584 over 30 days · improving
  • -630 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 4,889 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-22
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches6
Win rate83%
K/D0.72
Headshot %48%

Measured 16 Sep 202622 Sep 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Red band among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,180), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerRed band medianGold band medianvs Gold band
Headshot rate44.1%49.2%50.2%6.1% short
Shot accuracy11.5%13.3%11.6%meets
Kill/death ratio0.641.121.180.54 short
Match win rate44.2%48.5%51.9%7.7% short

This profile matches the typical Gold band player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Gold band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLivPREMIER25,111 · Red bandPEAK ELO1,583csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning30
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54424Last 10054%Win rateWWWWLWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −1.7pp headshot accuracy · −71ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 420ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 512ms

Last 20

  • 1271 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 547ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim8.3
Utility5.0
Positioning3.0
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch3.4

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 53 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 593ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning3.0
Utility5.0
Mechanics4.7
Opening Duels0.0
Win Impact5.6

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.04−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.04
Reaction time571ms−112ms
first ⅓ avg 683ms → last ⅓ avg 571ms
Headshot accuracy29.0%+5.9%
first ⅓ avg 23.1% → last ⅓ avg 29.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–8 · office, 14 May
100%Best headshot accuracy · 13–2 · nuke, 4 Sept
453msFastest reaction time · 13–2 · nuke, 21 Sept
13–0Biggest win · train, 7 Jun

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
W4Current streak
66In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

trainBest map · 80% over 5anubisWeakest map · 39% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheS2013765%-0.04
anubisC1871139%-0.03
nukeB158753%-0.03
infernoC146843%-0.04
ancientA117464%-0.02
trainS54180%-0.02
mirage42250%-0.04
dust242250%-0.06
overpass31233%-0.03
office220100%0.07
vertigo220100%0.01
canopy1010%-0.12
splinter1010%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (39% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

84,804Lifetime kills
0.64K/D
6,024Matches
44.2%Match win rate
44.1%Headshot %
11.5%Shot accuracy
8,536MVPs
7,410Hours (in match)
7,507Bombs planted
1,414Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4731,327
AWP4,684
SG 5532,085
MAC-101,989
AUG1,665
XM10141,448

Lifetime map wins

7,101vertigo
5,722inferno
5,319nuke
2,053train
1,596dust2
809office
123italy
111lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,506Matches
50%Win rate
0.81Avg K/D
73.2ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis16960%1.0215.0
Ancient12452%0.9914.3
Inferno7540%0.9715.2
Vertigo7458%1.0615.2
Mirage5733%0.9214.1
Nuke5443%0.9814.1
Dust21638%0.9913.3
Overpass1457%0.9416.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

28.6%Headshot accuracy
33.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
47.6%Spray accuracy
71.3%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
593msReaction time
16.9%T opening success
28.6%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
14.4%Flash assists
11.13HE damage / grenade
4.82Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 16.8984% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

39% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–100.0117%22 Sept
nuke13–20.0443%21 Sept
ancient16–14-0.0415%21 Sept
cache13–9-0.0623%15 Sept
cache0–2-0.170%15 Sept
mirage13–11-0.0222%14 Sept
ancient2–13-0.0536%14 Sept
cache14–16-0.0510%13 Sept
nuke8–13-0.1257%13 Sept
ancient13–10.0239%13 Sept
anubis8–4-0.0419%13 Sept
inferno15–15-0.058%8 Sept
anubis9–13-0.0234%4 Sept
anubis1–13-0.130%4 Sept
nuke13–2-0.01100%4 Sept
inferno8–13-0.0440%4 Sept
cache5–1-0.0329%4 Sept
cache13–9-0.0214%1 Sept
ancient13–4-0.0018%27 Aug
inferno9–1-0.0019%27 Aug
cache13–6-0.1022%27 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0943%23 Aug
nuke16–13-0.0232%23 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0325%21 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0231%20 Aug
ancient13–16-0.0314%20 Aug
canopy1–13-0.1280%19 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0619%19 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0925%18 Aug
dust21–13-0.0643%15 Aug
splinter17–19-0.0121%15 Aug
anubis2–50.0623%15 Aug
cache13–9-0.0636%7 Aug
nuke13–50.0027%7 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0230%7 Aug
nuke13–2-0.0624%21 Jul
cache13–2-0.0520%21 Jul
dust213–9-0.050%21 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0426%21 Jul
anubis13–6-0.0137%17 Jul
ancient12–4-0.0510%17 Jul
cache13–8-0.0430%17 Jul
nuke2–130.0428%16 Jul
cache13–8-0.0327%12 Jul
ancient13–70.0818%12 Jul
cache10–13-0.0531%12 Jul
inferno13–16-0.0714%12 Jul
anubis13–6-0.0114%9 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0231%9 Jul
office13–10.0319%8 Jul
overpass13–11-0.0838%2 Jul
inferno3–13-0.0736%2 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0318%2 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0534%1 Jul
overpass5–13-0.0315%8 Jun
anubis8–13-0.0425%7 Jun
inferno6–13-0.0830%7 Jun
ancient13–5-0.068%7 Jun
anubis13–7-0.0716%7 Jun
train13–4-0.0537%7 Jun
train13–8-0.0230%7 Jun
train13–00.0229%7 Jun
nuke13–6-0.0417%6 Jun
train13–8-0.0119%6 Jun
train12–12-0.0325%6 Jun
anubis9–130.0119%5 Jun
vertigo13–60.0622%5 Jun
vertigo13–8-0.0421%5 Jun
nuke4–13-0.0833%2 Jun
nuke13–7-0.0242%2 Jun
ancient13–10.0025%2 Jun
anubis13–9-0.1113%30 May
nuke4–13-0.0144%30 May
nuke5–130.017%27 May
anubis8–13-0.0814%18 May
dust26–13-0.0760%18 May
overpass15–150.0217%15 May
ancient1–13-0.0613%15 May
inferno13–3-0.0113%14 May
office13–80.1219%14 May
anubis13–70.0220%13 May
inferno3–13-0.0523%13 May
mirage13–8-0.0122%13 May
nuke13–11-0.0513%10 May
cache13–11-0.0420%9 May
cache6–13-0.0517%9 May
inferno3–13-0.0719%9 May
dust213–7-0.0533%8 May
cache13–10-0.0220%8 May
cache5–13-0.0231%8 May
cache8–13-0.0236%7 May
inferno13–9-0.0221%1 May
cache12–12-0.0621%1 May
anubis11–130.0418%1 May
ancient11–13-0.0424%30 Apr
inferno13–7-0.0124%30 Apr
anubis13–16-0.0126%30 Apr
anubis13–8-0.0731%29 Apr
cache13–00.0315%29 Apr
cache13–50.018%29 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →