70H70R1

70H70R1 — CS2 Stats

FI76561198989765246[U:1:1029499518]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,603Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,772Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating19,826Top 50% of 213,399 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~9.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#89099 of 260007 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,668 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 29 Oct 2026 (7 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,826 -2,769 2 Jul – 29 Oct · 24 days played
19,40922,595peak 22,5952 Jul29 Oct
22,595Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,668Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
44Days played since 2026-05-08

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,668
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 83 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-10
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-10

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,769 below peak (22,595)
  • -277 over 30 days · steady
  • -173 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 174 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-10
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-10

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is recorded after matches CSDB sees, so those points are days actually played — but only from the day tracking started: no feed exposes the ELO a past match ended on, so nothing before it can be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,595), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate45.6%45.7%46.8%1.2% short
Shot accuracy13.2%12.7%13.0%meets
Kill/death ratio0.951.051.060.11 short
Match win rate44.8%45.7%46.3%1.5% short

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG70H70R1FACEITLevel 7 · 1,668 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER19,826 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,668csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim59
Positioning63
Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY40–47–13Last 10040%Win rateLWLWLLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −4.2pp headshot accuracy · +22ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 653ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 654ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 643ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim5.9
Utility6.1
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels3.6
Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 75% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 69% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 69% on T to 40% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 613ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.9
Positioning6.3
Utility6.1
Mechanics6.6
Opening Duels6.1
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time629ms−65ms
first ⅓ avg 694ms → last ⅓ avg 629ms
Headshot accuracy18.4%−3.7%
first ⅓ avg 22.1% → last ⅓ avg 18.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 10–13 · ancient, 13 Aug →
39%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · inferno, 9 Jul →
422msFastest reaction time · 9–13 · anubis, 14 Sept →
13–2Biggest win · ancient, 31 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
7–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 56% over 9dust2Weakest map · 25% over 28
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2D287–2125%-0.02
cacheC146–843%-0.00
anubisC145–936%-0.01
nukeD134–931%-0.01
infernoB126–650%-0.00
ancientA95–456%0.00
mirage—44–0100%-0.01
overpass—31–233%0.01
vertigo—22–0100%0.05
alpine—10–10%-0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 28). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

109,282Lifetime kills
0.95K/D
5,379Matches
44.8%Match win rate
45.6%Headshot %
13.2%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 7 players
10,977MVPs
2,772Hours (in match)
7,529Bombs planted
1,469Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4736,558
AWP10,092
FAMAS2,752
Knife2,181
MAC-102,072

Lifetime map wins

11,958inferno
11,533nuke
10,946dust2
2,271train
1,186vertigo
142cbble
22office
12assault

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,532Matches
50%Win rate
1.01Avg K/D
75.7ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust212749%0.9714.9
Ancient11750%1.0314.8
Anubis11351%0.9815.0
Nuke10856%1.0315.1
Inferno9044%1.0415.6
Mirage3450%0.9414.4
Overpass3358%0.9613.1
Cache1136%0.9612.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.8%Headshot accuracy
31.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
30.9%Spray accuracy
79.8%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
613msReaction time
68.9%T opening success
39.9%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
8.0%Flash assists
12.68HE damage / grenade
10.36Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 39.865% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 28 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust20–13-0.108%3 Nov →
dust213–11-0.0528%30 Oct →
inferno9–130.0016%30 Oct →
inferno13–40.0428%29 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.0410%24 Oct →
dust21–5-0.130%23 Oct →
mirage13–50.0718%23 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0416%23 Oct →
dust213–3-0.0112%22 Oct →
dust28–130.0217%22 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0621%22 Oct →
nuke13–100.0419%14 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0317%10 Oct →
anubis13–9-0.0126%9 Oct →
cache5–130.0323%9 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0320%8 Oct →
mirage13–8-0.0115%8 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0515%8 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.0122%5 Oct →
cache16–12-0.0217%5 Oct →
cache13–30.0423%5 Oct →
cache15–15-0.0217%1 Oct →
dust216–13-0.0519%1 Oct →
nuke13–3-0.0222%1 Oct →
inferno16–14-0.0118%30 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0415%30 Sept →
dust215–15-0.0124%22 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.0318%22 Sept →
dust213–160.0321%21 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0418%21 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0328%20 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0419%20 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.0918%15 Sept →
anubis9–130.0419%14 Sept →
nuke11–130.0225%14 Sept →
cache15–15-0.0325%14 Sept →
overpass12–12-0.0126%4 Sept →
anubis13–70.0425%4 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.055%4 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.1124%4 Sept →
anubis14–16-0.026%31 Aug →
ancient13–20.0413%31 Aug →
dust22–13-0.0418%31 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.0224%26 Aug →
ancient13–5-0.0114%26 Aug →
ancient13–80.0310%25 Aug →
mirage16–13-0.0511%25 Aug →
dust24–13-0.0219%25 Aug →
inferno1–130.0136%19 Aug →
anubis13–100.0122%19 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0627%19 Aug →
cache15–150.0230%19 Aug →
overpass8–80.0825%19 Aug →
dust215–15-0.0419%17 Aug →
nuke13–60.0628%17 Aug →
ancient13–6-0.0122%17 Aug →
ancient10–130.0921%13 Aug →
inferno13–110.0322%12 Aug →
nuke13–80.038%12 Aug →
inferno4–130.0419%11 Aug →
cache12–120.0119%11 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0817%11 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0324%6 Aug →
inferno15–150.029%5 Aug →
nuke10–130.0115%5 Aug →
anubis15–150.0113%5 Aug →
ancient13–110.0126%4 Aug →
inferno13–8-0.0110%4 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0626%3 Aug →
inferno13–5-0.0523%3 Aug →
nuke7–130.0119%3 Aug →
dust26–130.0723%17 Jul →
dust29–13-0.0939%17 Jul →
nuke3–13-0.1018%17 Jul →
ancient14–16-0.0411%17 Jul →
dust213–100.0221%17 Jul →
vertigo13–100.0628%9 Jul →
dust20–11-0.0038%9 Jul →
inferno13–30.0039%9 Jul →
anubis13–40.0113%9 Jul →
cache13–110.0218%9 Jul →
cache13–5-0.0137%8 Jul →
inferno12–12-0.0027%8 Jul →
dust212–120.0217%8 Jul →
dust210–130.0416%7 Jul →
vertigo13–110.0422%7 Jul →
cache11–130.0218%7 Jul →
ancient5–13-0.0423%6 Jul →
cache13–8-0.0725%3 Jul →
overpass13–9-0.0523%3 Jul →
dust212–12-0.0515%3 Jul →
alpine3–13-0.1014%3 Jul →
anubis7–13-0.0117%3 Jul →
dust213–90.0822%2 Jul →
anubis5–13-0.0134%13 Jun →
dust213–90.0017%4 Jun →
cache5–130.0514%1 Jun →
nuke6–13-0.1215%29 May →
anubis17–190.0219%13 May →
cache13–70.0126%8 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.