Leppänen

Leppänen — CS2 Stats

FI76561198983301251[U:1:1023035523]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,705Tracked matches61%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating20,000Top 50% of 185,711 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~8.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#75607 of 232293 tracked
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,250 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 26 days played since 23 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,000 +5,773 23 Aug19 Sept · 24 days played
14,22720,111peak 20,11123 Aug19 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,250 +0 2 Sept18 Sept · 3 observations
1,2501,250peak 1,2502 Sept18 Sept
20,619Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,250Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
26Days played since 2026-08-23

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,250
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 101 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier CS Rating

  • 111 below peak (20,111)
  • +5,773 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 5,000 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-18
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLeppänenFACEITLevel 6 · 1,250 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER20,000 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,250csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67
Positioning55
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY59383Last 10059%Win rateWLLWLWLLTW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +1.7pp headshot accuracy · −25ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 626ms

Last 10

  • 451 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 601ms

Last 20

  • 1172 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 614ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim6.7
Utility5.3
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels2.1
Clutch2.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 620ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7
Positioning5.5
Utility5.3
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels2.9
Win Impact8.6

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time619ms−14ms
first ⅓ avg 632ms → last ⅓ avg 619ms
Headshot accuracy14.3%−3.0%
first ⅓ avg 17.3% → last ⅓ avg 14.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–7 · nuke, 8 Sept
33%Best headshot accuracy · 13–9 · dust2, 25 Aug
453msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · anubis, 18 Sept
13–0Biggest win · anubis, 8 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
64In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 83% over 6mirageWeakest map · 50% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientS2617965%0.01
anubisA1810856%0.01
nukeA1710759%0.02
infernoB158753%0.00
cacheA116555%0.01
dust2S65183%0.02
mirageB63350%0.04
vertigo1010%-0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (50% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

275Matches
50%Win rate
1.07Avg K/D
79.3ADR
35%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

32%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke4461%1.1215.8
Inferno4353%1.2717.1
Ancient4144%1.0714.5
Anubis3352%0.9914.3
Dust21741%0.8713.8
Mirage1233%0.9013.5
Vertigo1155%1.3116.3
Overpass786%1.3920.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.1%Headshot accuracy
37.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.8%Spray accuracy
83.3%Counter-strafing
10.6°Preaim
620msReaction time
39.2%T opening success
43.8%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
2.3%Flash assists
7.55HE damage / grenade
8.67Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.0893% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.2081% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–70.018%20 Sept
anubis8–130.0619%19 Sept
cache7–130.0013%19 Sept
nuke13–7-0.0026%19 Sept
nuke7–13-0.0213%19 Sept
cache13–90.0215%19 Sept
inferno9–13-0.0715%19 Sept
anubis7–13-0.1014%18 Sept
nuke12–120.0017%18 Sept
ancient13–11-0.0120%18 Sept
anubis13–9-0.0120%17 Sept
nuke13–100.039%17 Sept
anubis10–130.0222%17 Sept
ancient13–10-0.0514%17 Sept
cache15–15-0.0411%16 Sept
ancient13–4-0.0226%16 Sept
nuke13–90.099%16 Sept
ancient13–90.056%16 Sept
nuke8–13-0.048%15 Sept
inferno13–40.0117%15 Sept
ancient13–40.0115%15 Sept
anubis11–13-0.0610%15 Sept
cache13–50.1121%15 Sept
nuke13–60.0211%13 Sept
anubis10–13-0.039%13 Sept
dust211–13-0.0113%13 Sept
mirage13–80.039%13 Sept
ancient13–60.0016%13 Sept
nuke13–110.0415%12 Sept
nuke9–13-0.0210%12 Sept
dust213–11-0.0415%12 Sept
ancient13–60.0414%12 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0315%12 Sept
mirage13–90.0915%11 Sept
ancient13–90.0718%11 Sept
dust213–40.0612%11 Sept
inferno9–13-0.047%11 Sept
anubis13–1-0.0220%11 Sept
ancient13–5-0.0313%10 Sept
nuke13–80.0210%10 Sept
anubis13–50.0116%10 Sept
nuke13–30.0615%10 Sept
dust213–100.0112%10 Sept
anubis9–13-0.0016%10 Sept
nuke9–130.0414%9 Sept
ancient7–13-0.007%9 Sept
anubis13–00.0719%8 Sept
ancient5–13-0.0114%8 Sept
nuke13–70.1211%8 Sept
ancient16–130.0210%8 Sept
anubis10–130.0312%8 Sept
inferno13–60.0624%7 Sept
inferno13–16-0.0211%7 Sept
dust213–90.0426%7 Sept
inferno9–13-0.0418%6 Sept
inferno7–130.0318%5 Sept
nuke13–70.0215%5 Sept
ancient9–13-0.0823%5 Sept
ancient11–13-0.0117%5 Sept
mirage11–130.0819%4 Sept
inferno13–8-0.0215%4 Sept
cache10–130.0221%4 Sept
nuke13–50.0618%4 Sept
anubis13–110.059%3 Sept
ancient13–9-0.0215%3 Sept
ancient8–13-0.0712%3 Sept
ancient13–80.1213%3 Sept
inferno8–4-0.0032%3 Sept
anubis13–10-0.0114%2 Sept
ancient13–100.0118%2 Sept
ancient4–130.0115%1 Sept
ancient9–130.0512%1 Sept
anubis13–50.0427%1 Sept
mirage13–60.1020%1 Sept
anubis13–7-0.038%30 Aug
inferno13–50.0517%30 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0317%30 Aug
inferno13–20.0018%29 Aug
anubis13–110.0417%29 Aug
anubis16–120.0513%29 Aug
cache13–11-0.0415%28 Aug
ancient13–20.117%28 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0018%28 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0126%28 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0217%27 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0425%27 Aug
cache8–130.0217%27 Aug
cache13–8-0.0526%27 Aug
cache13–70.0614%27 Aug
cache13–7-0.0021%25 Aug
inferno15–150.009%25 Aug
ancient16–120.0021%25 Aug
dust213–90.0433%25 Aug
inferno13–40.0410%24 Aug
vertigo3–9-0.0812%24 Aug
ancient13–7-0.005%24 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0116%24 Aug
inferno9–130.0622%23 Aug
cache9–13-0.0114%23 Aug
nuke5–130.0015%23 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →