Leppänen

Leppänen — CS2 Stats

FI76561198983301251[U:1:1023035523]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,749Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating19,039Top 50% of 204,150 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~12.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#94918 of 251271 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,250 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Oct 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,039 +2,891 2 Sept – 10 Oct · 26 days played
16,14820,111peak 20,1112 Sept10 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,250 +0 2 Sept – 27 Sept · 6 observations
1,2501,250peak 1,2502 Sept27 Sept
20,619Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,250Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
27Days played since 2026-09-02

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,250
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 — 101 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,072 below peak (20,111)
  • +1,760 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 961 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-18
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLeppänenFACEITLevel 7 · 1,250 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER19,039 · Purple band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,250csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim58
Positioning48
Utility67

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56–42–2Last 10056%Win rateLLWLWWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −4.0pp headshot accuracy · −24ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 664ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 621ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 633ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3.2 against its own average).

Aim5.8
Utility6.7
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels0.1
Clutch2.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 71% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 655ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.8
Positioning4.8
Utility6.7
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels2.1
Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time641ms−8ms
first ⅓ avg 649ms → last ⅓ avg 641ms
Headshot accuracy16.9%+2.7%
first ⅓ avg 14.1% → last ⅓ avg 16.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–7 · nuke, 8 Sept →
32%Best headshot accuracy · 5–13 · mirage, 23 Sept →
422msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · inferno, 27 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · anubis, 8 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
3–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 70% over 23infernoWeakest map · 38% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientS2316–770%0.01
nukeS2014–670%0.03
infernoC166–1038%-0.00
anubisB157–847%0.01
dust2B115–645%-0.00
mirageB84–450%0.02
cacheA74–357%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

288Matches
50%Win rate
1.07Avg K/D
79.8ADR
36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

32%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke4762%1.1416.1
Inferno4753%1.2717.1
Ancient4243%1.0714.6
Anubis3551%1.0014.3
Dust21937%0.8513.5
Mirage1233%0.9013.5
Vertigo1155%1.3116.3
Overpass786%1.3920.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.8%Headshot accuracy
34.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.3%Spray accuracy
80.5%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
655msReaction time
40.3%T opening success
36.1%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
6.6%Flash assists
11.36HE damage / grenade
11.39Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 36.0653% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno6–13-0.0413%10 Oct →
cache5–13-0.0320%7 Oct →
mirage13–30.0926%7 Oct →
ancient9–130.0117%6 Oct →
inferno13–80.0812%6 Oct →
inferno13–60.0610%4 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0113%4 Oct →
inferno13–3-0.0318%4 Oct →
nuke13–50.0115%4 Oct →
ancient13–10.0315%4 Oct →
inferno13–90.0420%4 Oct →
ancient13–20.0719%2 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0117%1 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0414%1 Oct →
dust212–16-0.0416%1 Oct →
anubis9–13-0.0320%1 Oct →
cache13–20.0031%1 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0413%27 Sept →
inferno5–130.0525%27 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.0124%27 Sept →
ancient13–16-0.0117%27 Sept →
cache13–8-0.0722%27 Sept →
dust27–130.0711%26 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0523%26 Sept →
ancient11–130.0310%25 Sept →
nuke13–60.0715%25 Sept →
ancient13–7-0.0416%25 Sept →
anubis13–60.0316%24 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0313%24 Sept →
nuke13–90.1013%24 Sept →
mirage13–90.0612%24 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0614%23 Sept →
nuke16–13-0.0220%23 Sept →
mirage2–13-0.0115%23 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0225%23 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0332%23 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0223%21 Sept →
anubis13–50.1127%21 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0415%21 Sept →
nuke14–16-0.0213%21 Sept →
ancient13–60.0613%21 Sept →
nuke13–80.069%20 Sept →
anubis13–50.0313%20 Sept →
ancient13–70.018%20 Sept →
anubis8–130.0619%19 Sept →
cache7–130.0013%19 Sept →
nuke13–7-0.0026%19 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0213%19 Sept →
cache13–90.0215%19 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0715%19 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.1014%18 Sept →
nuke12–120.0017%18 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0120%18 Sept →
anubis13–9-0.0120%17 Sept →
nuke13–100.039%17 Sept →
anubis10–130.0222%17 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.0514%17 Sept →
cache15–15-0.0411%16 Sept →
ancient13–4-0.0226%16 Sept →
nuke13–90.099%16 Sept →
ancient13–90.056%16 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.048%15 Sept →
inferno13–40.0117%15 Sept →
ancient13–40.0115%15 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0610%15 Sept →
cache13–50.1121%15 Sept →
nuke13–60.0211%13 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.039%13 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0113%13 Sept →
mirage13–80.039%13 Sept →
ancient13–60.0016%13 Sept →
nuke13–110.0415%12 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0210%12 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0415%12 Sept →
ancient13–60.0414%12 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0315%12 Sept →
mirage13–90.0915%11 Sept →
ancient13–90.0718%11 Sept →
dust213–40.0612%11 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.047%11 Sept →
anubis13–1-0.0220%11 Sept →
ancient13–5-0.0313%10 Sept →
nuke13–80.0210%10 Sept →
anubis13–50.0116%10 Sept →
nuke13–30.0615%10 Sept →
dust213–100.0112%10 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0016%10 Sept →
nuke9–130.0414%9 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.007%9 Sept →
anubis13–00.0719%8 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0114%8 Sept →
nuke13–70.1211%8 Sept →
ancient16–130.0210%8 Sept →
anubis10–130.0312%8 Sept →
inferno13–60.0624%7 Sept →
inferno13–16-0.0211%7 Sept →
dust213–90.0426%7 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0418%6 Sept →
inferno7–130.0318%5 Sept →
nuke13–70.0215%5 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.