creamsickle

creamsickle — CS2 Stats

DO76561198983244343[U:1:1022978615]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

386Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since
499Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.9 SolidAll-Rounder
CSDB Leaderboard#27215 of 231726 tracked
FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 33 days played since 17 Feb 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,290 +4,843 17 Feb6 Jul · 17 days played
18,63424,290peak 24,29017 Feb6 Jul
24,715Peak Premier in tracked matches
33Days played since 2026-02-17

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

No matches recorded between 12 Sep 2026 and 20 Sep 2026.

Measured 12 Sep 202620 Sep 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 2 among CSDB-tracked players (n=5,399), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 2 medianLevel 3 medianvs Level 3
Headshot rate50.6%41.3%41.9%above
Shot accuracy18.5%12.6%12.2%above
Kill/death ratio1.340.950.98above
Match win rate54.6%42.5%43.3%above

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 3 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGcreamsickleFACEITLevel 2STANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning65
Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD64306Last 10064%Win rateLLWWLLWTLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −1.8pp headshot accuracy · −22ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 544ms

Last 10

  • 361 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 531ms

Last 20

  • 1091 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 542ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-RounderNo style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim8.6
Utility6.2
Positioning6.5
Opening Duels6.1

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 58% on CT to 40% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning6.5
Utility6.2
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels4.8
Win Impact6.7

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.06−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.06 → last ⅓ avg 0.06
Reaction time533ms−18ms
first ⅓ avg 551ms → last ⅓ avg 533ms
Headshot accuracy21.8%−0.8%
first ⅓ avg 22.6% → last ⅓ avg 21.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.29Best match rating · 13–6 · vertigo, 1 Jul
53%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · office, 23 Jun
336msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · ancient, 23 Jun
13–0Biggest win · train, 23 Jun

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
L2Current streak
52In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 86% over 14ancientWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2214864%0.04
nukeA1810856%0.07
vertigoS1412286%0.11
infernoS1311285%0.07
dust2C83538%0.03
cacheS75271%0.07
ancientD62433%-0.00
anubis41325%0.06
office330100%0.08
train330100%0.13
overpass1010%0.08
italy1010%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

29,511Lifetime kills
1.34K/D · Top 10% of Level 2 players
1,186Matches
54.6%Match win rate · Top 5% of Level 2 players
50.6%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 2 players
18.5%Shot accuracy · Top 10% of Level 2 players
4,507MVPs
499Hours (in match)
743Bombs planted
333Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,385inferno
2,363nuke
1,149dust2
411office
352vertigo
168train
77cbble
32lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.3%Headshot accuracy
38.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.1%Spray accuracy
77.5%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
522msReaction time
40.1%T opening success
58.3%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
14.6%Flash assists
13.59HE damage / grenade
9.41Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis3–130.1424%30 Aug
mirage10–130.0517%30 Aug
cache13–90.0121%9 Aug
mirage13–100.0723%9 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0214%9 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0116%29 Jul
dust213–20.0412%29 Jul
mirage15–15-0.0021%29 Jul
nuke10–130.1023%26 Jul
mirage12–16-0.0122%25 Jul
vertigo13–70.0219%23 Jul
cache13–90.1126%19 Jul
vertigo13–50.0528%6 Jul
nuke6–130.0227%6 Jul
mirage13–110.0915%6 Jul
nuke11–130.0414%6 Jul
inferno13–100.0610%6 Jul
inferno13–90.1723%6 Jul
inferno13–110.0825%6 Jul
mirage1–13-0.0424%6 Jul
mirage4–130.0219%6 Jul
dust211–13-0.0124%5 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0322%5 Jul
inferno8–130.1433%5 Jul
nuke13–80.0513%5 Jul
inferno13–50.0620%5 Jul
nuke13–70.1236%5 Jul
anubis13–100.0821%5 Jul
inferno16–130.1025%4 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0120%4 Jul
mirage16–120.0831%4 Jul
nuke13–20.1820%3 Jul
vertigo13–70.1931%3 Jul
mirage13–100.1126%1 Jul
vertigo13–60.2922%1 Jul
ancient7–130.0326%29 Jun
inferno13–80.0911%29 Jun
office13–70.1031%28 Jun
nuke13–40.0424%28 Jun
vertigo13–90.0634%28 Jun
inferno13–90.1129%28 Jun
train13–40.1132%28 Jun
nuke13–10.0044%28 Jun
cache13–50.0424%28 Jun
vertigo13–110.0833%28 Jun
mirage4–130.0226%27 Jun
nuke4–13-0.0050%27 Jun
vertigo13–80.0526%27 Jun
office13–60.0253%23 Jun
nuke13–50.1331%23 Jun
train13–00.1030%23 Jun
vertigo13–10.1225%23 Jun
ancient6–13-0.0619%23 Jun
nuke13–80.1335%21 Jun
inferno3–130.0625%21 Jun
inferno13–40.1137%21 Jun
mirage9–130.0425%21 Jun
mirage13–80.0714%20 Jun
mirage13–80.0215%20 Jun
dust26–13-0.0032%20 Jun
nuke13–60.0838%20 Jun
train13–20.1829%16 Jun
vertigo12–120.0318%14 Jun
nuke10–130.1230%14 Jun
mirage13–8-0.0327%14 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0314%14 Jun
vertigo6–130.0527%11 Jun
cache12–120.0327%11 Jun
mirage13–40.0524%11 Jun
vertigo13–60.0822%10 Jun
cache13–100.0828%9 Jun
vertigo13–40.1725%9 Jun
overpass12–120.0820%9 Jun
nuke13–40.1121%9 Jun
dust213–00.0634%5 Jun
inferno4–2-0.0211%5 Jun
mirage13–90.1126%5 Jun
cache13–40.1127%5 Jun
vertigo13–20.1720%5 Jun
cache5–130.0830%29 Apr
mirage13–70.1840%23 Apr
dust212–120.0523%22 Apr
vertigo13–90.1214%22 Apr
office13–100.1032%22 Apr
italy6–130.0130%22 Apr
dust212–30.1440%22 Apr
nuke12–120.1238%22 Apr
inferno16–12-0.0313%5 Apr
dust26–130.0018%5 Apr
ancient13–6-0.049%4 Apr
anubis6–130.0215%2 Apr
nuke0–5-0.060%31 Mar
dust26–13-0.0213%31 Mar
mirage13–50.1726%31 Mar
nuke13–90.0923%31 Mar
mirage16–14-0.0415%26 Feb
ancient13–40.0525%26 Feb
inferno13–60.0210%26 Feb
ancient4–130.0122%17 Feb
mirage13–50.0721%17 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →